http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672
--- Comment #3 from John Forrest jjhforrest at gmail dot com 2012-06-15
06:57:43 UTC ---
Balaji,
Attached - AbcMatrix.ii gives segfault using compile
There are more than a dozen places in my code where code such as -
for (int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43581
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-15 07:46:47 UTC ---
This problem was most probably due to binutils as I can reproduce it even with
4.8 using
GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.21.51.20110514) 1.11
while
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
Bug #: 53679
Summary: Build failure in libgo
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
Bug #: 53680
Summary: Link problems with static libstdc++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Bug #: 53681
Summary: s390 bootstrap failure since 187965
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53675
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #2 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru 2012-06-15 08:30:06 UTC ---
$ uname -a
Linux m246 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 9 12:54:40 EST 2010 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
$ cat /etc/*-release
CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
When building on
$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
08:30:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is an ice-on-invalid - how can that break bootstrap?
delta was a bit too eager. Same happens with:
int
__gcov_execle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #3 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru 2012-06-15 08:34:13 UTC ---
When I'm trying link libstdc++.a statically to my .so I see messages like:
undefined versioned symbol name std::defer_lock@@GLIBCPP_3
$ nm libstdc++.a | grep @
shows
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894
__vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #13 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #4 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru 2012-06-15 08:57:21 UTC ---
Note: undocumented configure option --disable-symvers helps but I think
building with default parameters must work properly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
09:03:04 UTC ---
This started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173856
The current cost model is seriously insufficient.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
09:22:04 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 15 09:22:00 2012
New Revision: 188651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188651
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #5 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru 2012-06-15 10:22:36 UTC ---
The exact description:
$ g++ -o formats/alcatel_alm9_decoder.fmt -shared -Llib -static-libgcc -O3
-Wl,-s -Wl,--no-undefined src/alcatel_alm9_decoder.o formats.a decoder.a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
10:25:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Note: undocumented configure option --disable-symvers helps but I think
building with default parameters must work properly
It's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
10:29:36 UTC ---
isn't this PR 52689 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #8 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru 2012-06-15 10:30:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #4)
Note: undocumented configure option --disable-symvers helps but I think
building with default parameters must work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #9 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru 2012-06-15 10:33:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
isn't this PR 52689 ?
Probably it is.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #10 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru 2012-06-15 10:36:24 UTC ---
When 4.7.1 will be released?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.v.a at ngs dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53592
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
10:41:19 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 15 10:41:13 2012
New Revision: 188653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188653
Log:
PR ada/53592
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682
Bug #: 53682
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in cselib_lookup (SEGV) on
i586-linux-gnu
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53592
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
10:46:16 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 15 10:46:12 2012
New Revision: 188654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188654
Log:
PR ada/53592
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53592
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51581
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
11:07:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 15 11:07:47 2012
New Revision: 188656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188656
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51581
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53589
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53580
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
Bug #: 53683
Summary: cout doesn't support std::u16string
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
12:00:45 UTC ---
Possible the second two calls of promote_debug_loc should be replaced by a loop
over the locs, looking for the right l-loc that -g0 would have created in that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53684
Bug #: 53684
Summary: Cannot raise custom exceptions in configurable runtime
mode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
--- Comment #2 from Rui Maciel rui.maciel at gmail dot com 2012-06-15
13:08:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
If, in the test program, std::u16string is replaced with std::u32string, the
program is successfully
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53636
--- Comment #1 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
13:30:40 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Fri Jun 15 13:30:36 2012
New Revision: 188661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188661
Log:
gcc/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52672
nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53685
Bug #: 53685
Summary: surprising warns about transfer with explicit
character range
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #11 from Georg georggcc at googlemail dot com 2012-06-15 14:54:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Fixed on the mainline.
Perfect result when run with -fdelete-dead-exceptions, or when
run without the switch (i.e., switches as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474
--- Comment #58 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15 14:56:33
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Fri Jun 15 14:56:26 2012
New Revision: 188667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188667
Log:
PR middle-end/38474
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53636
--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
15:11:51 UTC ---
Now fixed on mainline; still fails on 4.7.
(While the bug is probably latent even earlier, this particular test case does
not crash on 4.6.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474
--- Comment #59 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15 15:12:59
UTC ---
There should be no compile performance problems in expand anymore.
The alias stmt walker as used from IPA remains a problem, though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #3 from Niall Douglas s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2012-06-15
15:13:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
There's no point differentiating the gnu variants, they don't have any ABI
impact.
They don't have any ABI impact that we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #4 from Niall Douglas s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2012-06-15
15:23:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
you can use -frecord-gcc-switches to detect mixed objects in linked library.
Indeed, one could grok the .text section this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474
--- Comment #60 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-06-15 15:26:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #59)
There should be no compile performance problems in expand anymore.
The alias stmt walker as used from IPA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
15:37:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #1)
There's no point differentiating the gnu variants, they don't have any ABI
impact.
They don't have
gnatchop -r -v unit.ada
GNATCHOP 4.8.0 20120615 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 1998-2012, Free Software Foundation, Inc.
/home/bauhaus/mine/bin/gcc -c -x ada -gnats -gnatu unit.ada
splitting unit.ada into:
raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access
$
${HOME}/mine has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
--- Comment #1 from safety0ff.bugz at gmail dot com 2012-06-15 15:52:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 27626
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27626
Allows me to compile it, I do know if there's any value if checking for errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
safety0ff.bugz at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27626|Allows me to compile it, I |Allows me to compile it,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53685
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
16:41:53 UTC ---
Actually this is due to your modifications to gcc to enable fority by default
and glibc's bad idea that write needs to be check for error after each write.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-15 16:43:44 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jun 15 16:43:36 2012
New Revision: 188671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188671
Log:
2012-06-15 Marc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #6 from Niall Douglas s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2012-06-15
16:53:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
They don't have any ABI impact that we know of at the present time in this
present generation of GCCs. As a debug aid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53685
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
17:02:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(a) A minor one that in the second case, the length of record_type is
e-ts-u.cl-length == NULL instead of 4 (as one could be simply
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53687
Bug #: 53687
Summary: _mm_cmpistri generates redundant movslq %ecx,%rcx on
x86-64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
17:46:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Technically, you could add it to the top of stddef.h or whatever is a
guaranteed included library header:
libstdc++'s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688
Bug #: 53688
Summary: [4.8 Regression] 191.fma3d in SPEC CPU 2000
miscompiled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689
Bug #: 53689
Summary: [SH] GCC emits an invalid slot instruction for RTE
(Return from Exception)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52816
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690
Bug #: 53690
Summary: \u and \U are wrong encoded as U+0001.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53675
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
19:43:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 27627
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27627
Build log with new binutils
Using a newer binutils (2.22) the errors about
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672
--- Comment #4 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15 19:44:04 UTC ---
Author: bviyer
Date: Fri Jun 15 19:43:57 2012
New Revision: 188680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188680
Log:
This patch fixes bug PR 53672.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672
--- Comment #5 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com 2012-06-15
19:46:13 UTC ---
Hello John,
The revision mentioned above should fix this problem.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53691
Bug #: 53691
Summary: ICE in LAPACK 3.4.1 cgbrfsx.f
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53692
Bug #: 53692
Summary: OPTIONAL: Scalarizing over the wrong array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53691
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
--- Comment #18 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15
21:04:49 UTC ---
See comments in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01081.html
It's not the vectorization costing, as previously suggested.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53691
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-06-15
21:23:42 UTC ---
Reduced test case
SUBROUTINE CGBRFSX(N, RWORK)
INTEGER N
REAL RWORK(*)
REAL ZERO
PARAMETER (ZERO = 0.0E+0)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53565
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
--- Comment #3 from Allan McRae allan at archlinux dot org 2012-06-15
22:36:54 UTC ---
Just to be clear, I have not modified the compiler to enable fortify by
default, but it is in my CFLAGS...
As this is the only place that glibc's decision to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53693
Bug #: 53693
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in
vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:1438
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
81 matches
Mail list logo