[Bug c/53784] Scalar vector binary operation - error with -std=c9x/c1x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53784 --- Comment #2 from Dag Lem dag at nimrod dot no 2012-06-27 06:12:37 UTC --- Yes, gcc -fexcess-precision=standard -mavx -S test.c triggers the bug.

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 --- Comment #19 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 06:30:05 UTC --- Alas, it doesn't work on i686 or x86_64: the free_alloc_pool in vt_finalize has to be conditional on non-NULL, because we will skip vt_emit_notes (and thus

[Bug c++/53573] template type dependent name resolution broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 --- Comment #23 from Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com 2012-06-27 06:48:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) (In reply to comment #21) Is there any chance this 'feature' of GCC could be kept as a g++ specific extension in 'gnu++11' mode, as I

[Bug rtl-optimization/53785] New: coalescing multiple static instances in function scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53785 Bug #: 53785 Summary: coalescing multiple static instances in function scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug rtl-optimization/53785] coalescing multiple static instances in function scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53785 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 06:59:08 UTC --- The question comes, do we want to have a lock for each variable or one for the scope? One for each variable was easier to implement and might be more

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-27 08:28:27 UTC --- On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 --- Comment #3 from William J.

[Bug tree-optimization/53645] Missed optimization for vector integer division lowering

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53645 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/53778] bad code (delivering NaN instead of proper result) with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Orgis thomas.orgis at awi dot de 2012-06-27 08:58:57 UTC --- Created attachment 27710 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27710 tarball with complete source to reproduce the issue Ok, then, I feared as

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 --- Comment #20 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-06-27 09:00:52 UTC --- --- Comment #19 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 06:30:05 UTC --- Alas, it doesn't work on i686 or

[Bug fortran/53778] bad code (delivering NaN instead of proper result) with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Orgis thomas.orgis at awi dot de 2012-06-27 09:03:25 UTC --- ... and not to forget profiles.f90 ... that module links the perturbation in dat_init_density() to the wind in dat_init_wind(). Changes in there along with

[Bug rtl-optimization/52543] lower-subreg.c: code bloat of 300%-400% for multi-word memory splits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53783] [4.8 Regression] lambda in lambda in template function rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53783 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/28811] --with-pic vs static libraries and libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28811 --- Comment #18 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru 2012-06-27 10:19:18 UTC --- GCC 4.7.1 still fails to link .so against static libstdc++.a in 64-bit mode: $ g++ -shared -fPIC -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -o 1.so 1.cpp /usr/bin/ld:

[Bug libstdc++/28811] --with-pic vs static libraries and libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28811 --- Comment #19 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru 2012-06-27 10:27:14 UTC --- I'm sorry, compiler version was 4.6.1 in previous example. Output for 4.7.1: $ g++ -shared -fPIC -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -o 1.so 1.cpp /usr/bin/ld:

[Bug middle-end/53695] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1221 with -O2 -ftracer and labels/gotos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53695 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 10:32:53 UTC --- I am testing Index: gcc/cfgloop.c === *** gcc/cfgloop.c (revision 188987) ---

[Bug ada/53766] ICE in build_binary_op on Max_Size_In_Storage_Elements with -gnatp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 11:29:08 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 27 11:29:04 2012 New Revision: 189012 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189012 Log: 2012-06-27 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53676] [4.7/4.8 regression] empty loop is not always removed now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53676 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 11:32:34 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 27 11:32:30 2012 New Revision: 189013 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189013 Log: 2012-06-27 Richard

[Bug middle-end/53676] [4.7 regression] empty loop is not always removed now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53676 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.3, 4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/53676] [4.7 regression] empty loop is not always removed now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53676 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.3, 4.8.0

[Bug gcov-profile/38292] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] corrupted profile info with -O[23] -fprofile-use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292 Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug other/33190] tm.texi describes some non-existing hooks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190 --- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-06-27 13:30:31 UTC --- On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: SYSROOT_HEADERS_SUFFIX_SPEC (cppdefault.c gcc.c doc/tm.texi.in) This is of use

[Bug fortran/53778] bad code (delivering NaN instead of proper result) with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-06-27 13:44:43 UTC --- I have played a little with the attached test (I had to comment out 'use textdata' and 'use lapack'. On x86_64-apple-darwin10, I do not get any NaN

[Bug rtl-optimization/50176] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char-int conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 13:56:48 UTC --- Created attachment 27711 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27711 gcc48-pr50176.patch Here is an untested patch (hacked up on 4.7 branch, as

[Bug preprocessor/37215] ICE on 'gcc -E -dM -fpreprocessed - /dev/null'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215 --- Comment #14 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 14:03:13 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Wed Jun 27 14:03:08 2012 New Revision: 189016 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189016 Log: PR preprocessor/37215

[Bug c++/51033] generic vector subscript and shuffle support was not added to C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033 --- Comment #28 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 14:19:25 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Wed Jun 27 14:19:17 2012 New Revision: 189017 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189017 Log: 2012-06-27

[Bug c++/53786] New: [C++11] alias template causes g++ segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786 Bug #: 53786 Summary: [C++11] alias template causes g++ segfault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/37215] ICE on 'gcc -E -dM -fpreprocessed - /dev/null'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215 --- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 15:06:21 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Wed Jun 27 15:06:16 2012 New Revision: 189019 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189019 Log: Merged from trunk

[Bug preprocessor/37215] ICE on 'gcc -E -dM -fpreprocessed - /dev/null'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/53778] bad code (delivering NaN instead of proper result) with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 15:27:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) However if I add '-finit-real=snan -ffpe-trap=invalid,zero,overflow' to the\ flags, the line [...] For me it fails with: #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/50176] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char-int conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 15:28:52 UTC --- Ah, the i386.md part doesn't apply on the trunk, since http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184891 which seems to have fixed this issue for the case

[Bug fortran/35040] usage of init expression in its own definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35040 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 16:17:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Answer (see link): All these are wrong per answer to an interpretation request For completeness, that is Fortran 95's 90 at

[Bug lto/53787] New: Possible lto improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 Bug #: 53787 Summary: Possible lto improvement Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 --- Comment #6 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 17:36:56 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Wed Jun 27 17:36:50 2012 New Revision: 189021 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189021 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2012-06-27

[Bug fortran/41951] [OOP] Not diagnosing ambiguous operators (TB vs. INTERFACE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 17:38:11 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Wed Jun 27 17:38:00 2012 New Revision: 189022 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189022 Log: 2012-06-27 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/49591] [OOP] Multiple identical specific procedures in type-bound operator not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 17:38:11 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Wed Jun 27 17:38:00 2012 New Revision: 189022 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189022 Log: 2012-06-27 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug lto/53787] Possible lto improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-06-27 17:39:23 UTC --- AFAICT the subroutine is inlined with '-O3 -fwhole-program' or '-O3 -fwhole-program -flto' for 4.6.3, 4.7.1, and trunk. Indeed the inlining does not

[Bug fortran/49591] [OOP] Multiple identical specific procedures in type-bound operator not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/41951] [OOP] Not diagnosing ambiguous operators (TB vs. INTERFACE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 17:54:29 UTC --- Comment 12 is fixed with r189022, but comment 11 is still accepted without error.

[Bug lto/53787] Possible lto improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 --- Comment #2 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com 2012-06-27 17:56:48 UTC --- The testcase was reduced from some real app. No inlining happened there. Do you think this testcase is bad?

[Bug fortran/41951] [OOP] Not diagnosing ambiguous operators (TB vs. INTERFACE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug middle-end/53676] [4.7 regression] empty loop is not always removed now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53676 --- Comment #10 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-06-27 18:26:55 UTC --- Is there a fix targeted for 4.7.2? I can apply the patch and do some testing, if that helps. Let me know what I can do, if anything, so we can make 4.7 deployable

[Bug c++/53788] New: C++11 decltype sfinae static member function check (4.7.1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53788 Bug #: 53788 Summary: C++11 decltype sfinae static member function check (4.7.1) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/53616] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53616 Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc

[Bug c++/53563] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in start_decl, at cp/decl.c:4427

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53563 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 19:19:14 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 27 19:19:09 2012 New Revision: 189024 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189024 Log: PR c++/53563 *

[Bug c++/53563] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in start_decl, at cp/decl.c:4427

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53563 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/53787] Possible lto improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug target/53789] New: ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789 Bug #: 53789 Summary: ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.1 Status:

[Bug middle-end/53790] New: ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 Bug #: 53790 Summary: ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug middle-end/53790] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 --- Comment #1 from Samuel Jacob samueldotj at gmail dot com 2012-06-27 21:18:03 UTC --- Adding back trace just in case if it is needed.. (gdb) bt #0 0x005b999e in expand_expr_real_1 (exp=0x770b9580, target=optimized out,

[Bug middle-end/53790] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 21:19:47 UTC --- I think this could should be rejected as extern u_t extern_var; is declaring a variable with an unknown size.

[Bug middle-end/53790] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 Samuel Jacob samueldotj at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.3 ---

[Bug target/53749] ice in expand_shift_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53749 --- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 21:30:45 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Wed Jun 27 21:30:41 2012 New Revision: 189026 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189026 Log: i386: Fix logic error in

[Bug fortran/53778] bad code (delivering NaN instead of proper result) with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778 Thomas Orgis thomas.orgis at awi dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53790] ICE on dereferencing a extern union in asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53790 --- Comment #4 from Samuel Jacob samueldotj at gmail dot com 2012-06-27 21:31:25 UTC --- Also this doesnt happen with extern structures and variables. ie typedef struct u u_t; or typedef int u_t; is not causing the ICE.

[Bug fortran/53778] bad code (delivering NaN instead of proper result) with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Orgis thomas.orgis at awi dot de 2012-06-27 21:34:43 UTC --- Eh, it must have been -finit-real=nan ... so only wrong in one way;-)

[Bug tree-optimization/32120] missed PRE/FRE of a*2+4 and (a+2)*2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32120 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53786] [C++11] alias template causes g++ segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/53788] C++11 decltype sfinae static member function check (4.7.1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53788 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug preprocessor/53525] Performance regression due to enabling track-macro-expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53525 --- Comment #14 from jimis jimis at gmx dot net 2012-06-27 22:58:50 UTC --- Ping? Can someone review my last patch? I think it's clean enough to be applied (minus the TODO notes) and extra fixes can come separately later.

[Bug go/53679] Build failure in libgo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679 Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toolchain at

[Bug gcov-profile/45891] Guessed profile needs updating after profile-read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45891 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/53791] New: Branches not re-ordered using profile-information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53791 Bug #: 53791 Summary: Branches not re-ordered using profile-information Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/22586] GVN-PRE could do strength reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22586 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/35308] Straight line strength reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35308 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53785] coalescing multiple static instances in function scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53785 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-06-28 04:43:27 UTC --- I think that no one can rely on the way statics are initialized to tune side effects. The only things to guarantee are that is guarded and, I

[Bug lto/53777] [lto] lto does not propagate optimization flags from command lines given at compilation time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53777 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-06-28 05:07:57 UTC --- I fully agree that combining code sections to be optimized differently is not well defined in particular when optimization works looking at a