http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888
--- Comment #15 from xuepeng guo xguo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 06:02:17
UTC ---
Author: xguo
Date: Wed Jul 11 06:02:10 2012
New Revision: 189421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189421
Log:
2012-07-11 Terry Guo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
Bug #: 53922
Summary: VRP: semantic conflict between range_includes_zero_p
and value_inside_range
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53918
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53915
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
--- Comment #2 from amker.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com 2012-07-11
08:03:11 UTC ---
Yes, the dump before pass vrp2 is like:
main ()
{
int (*Tcc0) (int) cstore.6;
int g.2;
int g.0;
bb 2:
g.0_1 = g;
if (g.0_1 != 0)
goto bb 3;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859
--- Comment #4 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 08:41:43 UTC ---
Author: gretay
Date: Wed Jul 11 08:41:37 2012
New Revision: 189423
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189423
Log:
2012-07-10 Greta Yorsh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #16 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 09:05:03 UTC ---
humm I forgot about this case. It works in one of my dev branches, Let me
extract the uncommitted change and send it to gcc-patches.
Cheers
Christian
(In reply to comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923
Bug #: 53923
Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr'
in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11
09:27:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 27773
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27773
libgcc2-mulsc3.c: preprocessed bit of libgcc2.c
compile with
avr-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-07-11
09:46:06 UTC ---
Backporting r186159 and its followup fix r186164 to 4.7.1 was easy and fixed
the test case there too (untested beyond this test case). Backporting those
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11
10:03:49 UTC ---
avr.c already contains code to work around problems from DCE, instead of DCE
working out proper solutions to cover AVR, see PR50063
Something goes wrong in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
--- Comment #3 from amker.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com 2012-07-11
10:12:24 UTC ---
vrp processes PHI node # cstore.6_9 = PHI x(3), y(2) in calling sequence:
vrp_visit_phi_node
- vrp_meet
When gcc gives up in function vrp_meet, it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53924
Bug #: 53924
Summary: unhelpful diagnostic in invalid declaration list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53924
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53925
Bug #: 53925
Summary: dbgcnt.c:dbg_cnt_set_limit_by_index emits diagnostic
via fprintf (stderr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926
Bug #: 53926
Summary: g++ fails to compile valid template code with casting
to QVariant and back
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11
11:36:09 UTC ---
It's not valid code, you ned to say foo().template valueT()
http://womble.decadent.org.uk/c++/template-faq.html#disambiguation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926
Andrey Matveyakin a.matveyakin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53926
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11
12:28:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 27774
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27774
untested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #17 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 12:35:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 27775
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27775
plus add combine
Here is the patch that I've been running since some time, it also use the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 13:05:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
Under target (sh-elf) big-endian SuperH-2 (SH7604) (options -m2 -mb
I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
Bug #: 53927
Summary: wrong value for DW_AT_static_link
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689
--- Comment #4 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 13:21:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
Under target (sh-elf) big-endian SuperH-2 (SH7604) (options -m2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53928
Bug #: 53928
Summary: use tar.xz
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53928
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11
14:03:04 UTC ---
c.f. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-03/msg00549.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de 2012-07-11
14:07:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 27776
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27776
preprocessed source
I assume for trunk there is the same issue, because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11
15:09:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Created attachment 27775 [details]
plus add combine
Here is the patch that I've been running since some time, it also use the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #19 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-11 15:24:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
Created attachment 27775 [details]
plus add combine
Here is the patch that I've been running since some time,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929
Bug #: 53929
Summary: Bug in the use of Intel asm syntax when a global is
named and
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53930
Bug #: 53930
Summary: bug in linker
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53930
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53921
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11708
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53931
Bug #: 53931
Summary: [C++11] braced function style cast to reference should
be prvalue
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51241
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-12
01:43:11 UTC ---
This hunk of RTL was generated in .expand for function f:
;; D.1356_3 = D.1355_2 * 2863311531;
(insn 9 8 10 (set (reg:SI 104)
(subreg:SI (reg:DI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53932
Bug #: 53932
Summary: [4.3 regression]C++ reference variable to member of
anonymous union in global is error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
49 matches
Mail list logo