[Bug rtl-optimization/54133] New: regrename introduces additional dependencies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54133 Bug #: 54133 Summary: regrename introduces additional dependencies Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug fortran/54134] New: ICE overriding derived type bound function with allocatable character as result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54134 Bug #: 54134 Summary: ICE overriding derived type bound function with allocatable character as result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/54133] regrename introduces additional dependencies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54133 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/54135] New: Dhrystone 2 test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54135 Bug #: 54135 Summary: Dhrystone 2 test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/54136] New: Compiling phoronix/dcraw with gcc 4.8 trunk causes infinite execution.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54136 Bug #: 54136 Summary: Compiling phoronix/dcraw with gcc 4.8 trunk causes infinite execution. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/54136] Compiling phoronix/dcraw with gcc 4.8 trunk causes infinite execution.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54136 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 09:01:54 UTC --- cam_xyz[0][j] = table[i].trans[j] How are those two arrays (cam_xyz[0] and trans) defined?

[Bug tree-optimization/54136] Compiling phoronix/dcraw with gcc 4.8 trunk causes infinite execution.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54136 --- Comment #2 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2012-07-31 09:02:34 UTC --- Created attachment 27904 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27904 Simplied test case

[Bug tree-optimization/54136] Compiling phoronix/dcraw with gcc 4.8 trunk causes infinite execution.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54136 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug pch/53880] [4.8 Regression] compile time regression when generating precompiled headers for boost

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Comment #32 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 09:21:03 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Tue Jul 31 09:20:56 2012 New Revision: 18 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=18 Log: PR pch/53880 *

[Bug tree-optimization/54136] Compiling phoronix/dcraw with gcc 4.8 trunk causes infinite execution.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54136 --- Comment #4 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2012-07-31 09:22:47 UTC --- Ok thanks will adjust the test case. So compiler can generate infinite loop incase of array out of bound acess?

[Bug pch/53880] [4.8 Regression] compile time regression when generating precompiled headers for boost

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.8.0 | --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/54136] Compiling phoronix/dcraw with gcc 4.8 trunk causes infinite execution.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54136 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 09:24:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Ok thanks will adjust the test case. So compiler can generate infinite loop incase of array out of bound acess? Yes,

[Bug tree-optimization/54132] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect loop transformation with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54132 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/54130] Recognize builtins with bool return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54130 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 09:32:18 UTC --- I think your non-matching prototype disables builtin recognition. The C standard specifies isnan as returning int, so I think GCC is correct here.

[Bug fortran/54134] [OOP] ICE overriding derived type bound function with allocatable character as result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54134 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug bootstrap/54128] GCC does not bootstrap on little endian mips due to mis-compare on tree-data-ref.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/54135] Dhrystone 2 test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54135 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/54077] Bytemark FP EMULATION 44% slower than with clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t.artem at

[Bug c++/54130] Recognize builtins with bool return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54130 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 09:38:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I think your non-matching prototype disables builtin recognition. Yes. The C standard specifies isnan as returning int, so I think

[Bug bootstrap/54128] GCC does not bootstrap on little endian mips due to mis-compare on tree-data-ref.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 09:39:34 UTC --- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634881, That was an issue with Ada. Can you attach the preprocessed source for tree-data-ref.i? I might

[Bug c/54088] ICE at dwarf2out.c:20632 with -O1 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54088 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 09:42:07 UTC --- Report this bug to opensuse. This should have been fixed already by revision 187605 on the 4.7.1 branch.

[Bug c++/53624] GCC rejects function local types in template function with default template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53624 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 09:46:59 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Jul 31 09:46:46 2012 New Revision: 190001 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190001 Log: /cp 2012-07-31

[Bug c++/53624] GCC rejects function local types in template function with default template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53624 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/54077] Bytemark FP EMULATION 44% slower than with clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077 --- Comment #6 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-07-31 10:11:48 UTC --- clang FP EMULATION: 405.92 : 194.78 : 44.95 4.4.7 FP EMULATION: 337.44 : 161.92 : 37.36 4.5.4 FP EMULATION

[Bug fortran/54134] [OOP] ICE overriding derived type bound function with allocatable character as result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54134 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/54088] ICE at dwarf2out.c:20632 with -O1 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54088 Jan Engelhardt jengelh at inai dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse

[Bug pch/53880] [4.8 Regression] compile time regression when generating precompiled headers for boost

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/54088] ICE at dwarf2out.c:20632 with -O1 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54088 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug target/53975] [ia64] Target register of a speculative load moved to a branch register prior to the chk.s instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975 --- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 10:56:59 UTC --- Author: abel Date: Tue Jul 31 10:56:52 2012 New Revision: 190005 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190005 Log: PR target/53975

[Bug c/54088] ICE at dwarf2out.c:20632 with -O1 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54088 --- Comment #8 from Jan Engelhardt jengelh at inai dot de 2012-07-31 11:04:01 UTC --- The ICE continues to occur even if I leave out the handful of openSUSE patches.

[Bug target/53975] [ia64] Target register of a speculative load moved to a branch register prior to the chk.s instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975 --- Comment #19 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 11:11:22 UTC --- Fixed on trunk. Judging by the time the original wrong patch went in, this should be a regression and thus I'll commit this to 4.7 too after a week or

[Bug c++/54137] New: expected primary-expression error when accessing template method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54137 Bug #: 54137 Summary: expected primary-expression error when accessing template method Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54137] expected primary-expression error when accessing template method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54137 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54137] expected primary-expression error when accessing template method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54137 --- Comment #2 from vagran vagran.ast at gmail dot com 2012-07-31 11:46:02 UTC --- Thanks! Would be fine if the error message could contain the probable cause hint for this kind of error (if technically possible).

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 12:25:10 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Jul 31 12:25:04 2012 New Revision: 190007 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190007 Log: gcc: 2012-07-31

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug other/54138] New: configuring --without-cloog but executable links against system cloog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54138 Bug #: 54138 Summary: configuring --without-cloog but executable links against system cloog Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug middle-end/54109] [4.8 Regression] ICE at tree-ssa-structalias.c:3049 in get_constraint_for_component_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54109 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 12:34:42 UTC --- Inlining ends up generating MEM[(long unsigned int *)b + 8B].bits[2305843009213693951]{lb: 0 sz: 8} = 0 which is of course bogus, but it's what the

[Bug ada/54125] [4.8 regression] s-atopri.adb:40:10: Support_Atomic_Primitives is undefined broke Ada on sparc64-linux and armv5tel-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54125 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc64-linux |sparc64-linux,

[Bug fortran/54134] [OOP] ICE overriding derived type bound function with allocatable character as result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54134 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 13:04:00 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Tue Jul 31 13:03:53 2012 New Revision: 190010 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190010 Log: 2012-07-31 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/54134] [OOP] ICE overriding derived type bound function with allocatable character as result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54134 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/54138] [4.8 Regression] configuring --without-cloog but executable links against system cloog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54138 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |bootstrap

[Bug fortran/54134] [OOP] ICE overriding derived type bound function with allocatable character as result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54134 --- Comment #5 from koen.poppe at cs dot kuleuven.be 2012-07-31 13:10:46 UTC --- Thank you for the quick response and solution!

[Bug testsuite/54139] New: [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Bug #: 54139 Summary: [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug target/52412] another unnecessary register move on arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52412 amker.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker.cheng at

[Bug c++/54140] New: -Wswitch shouldn't complain about out-of-range values that are cast to the correct type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54140 Bug #: 54140 Summary: -Wswitch shouldn't complain about out-of-range values that are cast to the correct type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug c++/54130] Recognize builtins with bool return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54130 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-07-31 14:43:18 UTC --- In C it's a macro not a function and there is no guarantee that there exists a function with that name, or what the semantics of such a

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/54128] GCC does not bootstrap on little endian mips due to mis-compare on tree-data-ref.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128 --- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 15:17:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27906 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27906 Compressed preprocessed test case Sorry about not including the attachment

[Bug c++/54140] -Wswitch shouldn't complain about out-of-range values that are cast to the correct type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54140 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 15:27:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) This would have been appropriate if I wrote case 72:, but I didn't -- I wrote case (Enum)72:. This is an explicit indication

[Bug bootstrap/54128] GCC does not bootstrap on little endian mips due to mis-compare on tree-data-ref.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128 --- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 15:26:56 UTC --- I configured with: --disable-libssp --disable-libgomp --disable-libmudflap --disable-fixed-point --disable-decimal-float --with-arch=mips32r2 --with-synci

[Bug c++/54140] -Wswitch shouldn't complain about out-of-range values that are cast to the correct type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54140 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 15:34:19 UTC --- However changing the range of the enum doesn't make any difference, so please ignore my comment!

[Bug fortran/54141] New: The optimizer -O produces a bug.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54141 Bug #: 54141 Summary: The optimizer -O produces a bug. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3

[Bug target/54142] New: ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 Bug #: 54142 Summary: ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

What is a Real Earning Surprise

The subscrubers who took care to read to the Friday news, earned as much as +70% (seventy percent, I repeat) on V N DB today. V N DB was priced 0.08 on this day, those who bought $2,000 on July 27th got $3,200 today and the people who invested ten grands now have $16,000. Where else can you

[Bug testsuite/53664] neon-testgen.ml generates duplicate scan-assembler directives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664 --- Comment #8 from Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 15:56:12 UTC --- For some reason I couldn't apply the patch, but manually changed the tests to use { scan-assembler-times regexp 2 } instead of { scan assembler regexp }.

[Bug target/54142] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #1 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2012-07-31 16:12:18 UTC --- We have determined that we can bypass the failure with the following configure switches: --with-long-double-128 --with-cpu-32=power4 --with-tune-32=power6

[Bug testsuite/53664] neon-testgen.ml generates duplicate scan-assembler directives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664 --- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 16:16:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) For some reason I couldn't apply the patch, but manually changed the tests to use { scan-assembler-times regexp 2 } instead

[Bug c++/54140] -Wswitch shouldn't complain about out-of-range values that are cast to the correct type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54140 --- Comment #3 from Aryeh Gregor ayg at aryeh dot name 2012-07-31 16:18:14 UTC --- Yeah, sorry, it was a bad example. Assigning 72 to this enum is undefined, so maybe this behavior is justifiable. The real-world example I was looking at didn't

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.6 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 Hagay hagayg at broadcom dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hagayg at broadcom dot

[Bug target/54142] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 16:35:02 UTC --- sldi and srdi are both standard PowerPC64 instructions. How did you configure GCC?

[Bug fortran/54141] The optimizer -O produces a bug.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54141 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/53664] neon-testgen.ml generates duplicate scan-assembler directives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664 --- Comment #10 from Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 16:49:23 UTC --- The problem is the regular expression, which matches far too much text and ends up with a length of 5 instead of 2.

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.6 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #66 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 16:49:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #65) Also saw the same problem on MIPS Compiling using 'gcc version 4.5.2 (Sourcery CodeBench Lite 2011.09-86)' You should report

[Bug target/54142] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #3 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2012-07-31 16:53:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) sldi and srdi are both standard PowerPC64 instructions. How did you configure GCC? No special switches. For example,

[Bug target/54142] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #4 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2012-07-31 16:57:55 UTC --- One of target platforms is running RHEL 6.2 on a POWER7 series processor. The binutils RPM is: binutils-2.20.51.0.2-5.28.el6.ppc64

[Bug fortran/54141] The optimizer -O produces a bug.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54141 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/51267] loop optimization error using LOC function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/54142] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #5 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2012-07-31 17:14:24 UTC --- Here is the complete output at the point of a make failure. /home/garyf/gcc-4.8/wrk/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/garyf/gcc-4.8/wrk/./gcc/ -B/home/gar

[Bug tree-optimization/54143] New: [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 8% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54143 Bug #: 54143 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 8% slower Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/53664] neon-testgen.ml generates duplicate scan-assembler directives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664 --- Comment #11 from Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 17:30:15 UTC --- Sorry, I had been assuming that the tests in our tree match what's upstream but the expressions to match are slightly different. I'll keep investigating.

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.6 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #67 from Hagay hagayg at broadcom dot com 2012-07-31 17:34:02 UTC --- Just reported to Mentor. Thanks

[Bug target/53233] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2103

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53233 Sean McGovern gseanmcg at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/53923] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/54143] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 8% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54143 --- Comment #1 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-07-31 17:48:57 UTC --- Created attachment 27908 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27908 20120422

[Bug tree-optimization/54143] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 8% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54143 --- Comment #2 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-07-31 17:50:20 UTC --- Created attachment 27909 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27909 20120429

[Bug c++/54144] New: With -sdt=c++0x certain incorrect arguments to map.insert cause gcc crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54144 Bug #: 54144 Summary: With -sdt=c++0x certain incorrect arguments to map.insert cause gcc crash Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status:

[Bug other/53615] Buffer overflow in the compiler?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug testsuite/53664] neon-testgen.ml generates duplicate scan-assembler directives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664 --- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 17:56:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) For some reason I couldn't apply the patch, but manually changed the tests to use { scan-assembler-times regexp 2 }

[Bug target/54142] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #6 from Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove at lbl dot gov 2012-07-31 17:59:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) sldi and srdi are both standard PowerPC64 instructions. IBM's Programming Environments Manual for 64-Bit Microprocessors lists

[Bug c++/54144] [4.6 Regression] With -std=c++0x certain incorrect arguments to map.insert cause gcc crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54144 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery,

[Bug testsuite/53664] neon-testgen.ml generates duplicate scan-assembler directives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664 --- Comment #13 from Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 18:01:55 UTC --- The scan-assembler finds the expression at least once and passes. The scan-assembler-times directive expects to find the expression twice, but the returned

[Bug c++/54145] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] no symbol generated for `void QMailThreadSortKey::deserializeQDataStream(QDataStream)'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54145 Bug #: 54145 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] no symbol generated for `void QMailThreadSortKey::deserializeQDataStream(QDataStre am)' Classification: Unclassified Product:

[Bug fortran/42418] PROCEDURE: Rejects interface which is both specific and generic procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42418 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 18:32:46 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Tue Jul 31 18:32:41 2012 New Revision: 190017 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190017 Log: 2012-07-31 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/54146] New: Very slow compile at -O1 (expand vars)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 Bug #: 54146 Summary: Very slow compile at -O1 (expand vars) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile at -O1 (expand vars)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 18:38:20 UTC --- Are you compiling GCC with --enable-checking=release to do the timings?

[Bug fortran/42418] PROCEDURE: Rejects interface which is both specific and generic procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42418 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/54125] [4.8 regression] s-atopri.adb:40:10: Support_Atomic_Primitives is undefined broke Ada on multiple platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54125 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc64-linux, |sparc64-linux,

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile at -O1 (expand vars)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 18:47:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Are you compiling GCC with --enable-checking=release to do the timings? I first noticed the issue with the compiler provided by

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 18:51:26 UTC --- Regarding the remaining acats fails, the following line in a-calend.adb appears to be miscompiled: Date_Dur := Date_Dur - Time_Dur

[Bug c++/54060] G++ warning mixes up anonymous types and anonymous namespaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/54147] New: [F03] Interface checks for PPCs TBPs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54147 Bug #: 54147 Summary: [F03] Interface checks for PPCs TBPs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/54130] Recognize builtins with bool return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54130 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 19:20:09 UTC --- Joseph, I understand your comments, but I don't know what conclusion to take from them about whether gcc should recognize int/bool isnan(double) as a

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 19:41:20 UTC --- Created attachment 27913 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27913 Testcase Testcase produces wrong output when compiled at -O0 and -O1.

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/54130] Recognize builtins with bool return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54130 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-07-31 19:59:50 UTC --- On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I understand your comments, but I don't know what conclusion to take from them

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-07-31 20:10:55 UTC --- Mine. Expected result for testcase is 112975202 (0x6bbdd62). Miscompiled result is 116077092194 (0x1b06bbdd62). -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug c++/54130] Recognize builtins with bool return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54130 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-31 20:13:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) If your system headers declare isnan with bool return type I advise making fixincludes fix them. But the C++ standard requires a

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile at -O1 (expand vars)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/54060] G++ warning mixes up anonymous types and anonymous namespaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2012-07-31 20:21:51 UTC --- What is the purpose of warning about the use of an anonymous type in this context?

  1   2   >