http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++11] type alias |[C++11] type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54310
Bug #: 54310
Summary: Order of operations during overload resolution
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54300
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54305
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54311
Bug #: 54311
Summary: Info about default template arguments in instantiation
backtrace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #139 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-18
09:36:55 UTC ---
oprofile of WPA:
649295 18.2243 lto1 lto1 lto_main()
3412569.5783 lto1 lto1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54312
Bug #: 54312
Summary: uniquify_nodes takes 12% of Mozilla LTO build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54313
Bug #: 54313
Summary: [4.8 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with
MALLOC_PERTURB – Segfault in bitmap_obstack_free
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54313
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
Bug #: 54314
Summary: undefined references to 'construction vtable for
std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstreamchar,
std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar '
Classification:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54313
--- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-18
10:35:41 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Sat Aug 18 10:35:36 2012
New Revision: 190502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190502
Log:
PR middle-end/54313
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54313
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #1 from gee jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-08-18 14:53:53 UTC ---
bug 53518 also has this problem.
reference type in method argument causes symbol reference of construction
vtable for ***.
so, construction vtable for * symbol must not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
--- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-08-18 16:10:43
UTC ---
With -maccumulate-outgoing-args, GCC 3.4 will also make
a copy.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315
Bug #: 54315
Summary: Unnecessary copy of return value
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-08-18 17:42:58
UTC ---
-m32 also causes extra copy:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr54315]$ gcc -S -O2 -m32 y.i
[hjl@gnu-6 pr54315]$ cat y.s
.filey.i
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-08-18 17:45:43
UTC ---
The difference between -m32 and -m64 is
- struct S160 D.1692;
+ struct S160 D.1719;
;; basic block 2, loop depth 0
;;pred: ENTRY
- D.1692 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
Bug #: 54316
Summary: [C++11] move constructor for string_stream
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #5 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2012-08-18 18:39:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(Note, apparent s/4.2.1/4.1.2/g in initial description.)
I'd suggest updating to just a later gcc build, if you can find *only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
Johan Lundberg lundberj at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lundberj at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813
Johan Lundberg lundberj at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lundberj at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #6 from Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove at lbl dot gov 2012-08-18
19:05:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5 by Gary Funck)
[...]
FYI, the failing system has Redhat Release 8 (circa 2002). Fedocra Core 8
didn't come out until circa 2007.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20313
Johan Lundberg lundberj at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lundberj at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|lundberj at gmail dot com |
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180
Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
--- Comment #8 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-18
21:19:51 UTC ---
my command line for compile:
c++ -ID:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.1\include -LD:\Program
Files\PostgreSQL\9.1\lib -lpq -o %application_file%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180
Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
--- Comment #9 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-18
21:41:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Why is this marked enhancement ?
Is this the same issue as PR 54213 ? If so please close that one.
What exactly is your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-18
21:43:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
It's known.
And documented
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39290
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-18
21:56:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thus, I concur that it seems to be fixed. However, one could consider to
include the two test cases of the IR in the testsuite -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39290
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-18
22:00:20 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Aug 18 22:00:10 2012
New Revision: 190504
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190504
Log:
Add the working testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180
--- Comment #18 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com
2012-08-18 22:07:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Your bug report is useless, you have not provided the information requested at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ so it cannot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180
Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
--- Comment #12 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com
2012-08-18 22:15:40 UTC ---
What exactly is your question and why do you think it's anything to do with
GCC?
that is one of my questions. Whether it is a GCC bug or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-18
22:18:28 UTC ---
*** Bug 54214 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823
--- Comment #24 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-18
23:16:57 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Aug 18 23:16:53 2012
New Revision: 190505
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190505
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501
--- Comment #6 from Dave Abrahams dave at boostpro dot com 2012-08-18
23:18:21 UTC ---
Jason, are you submitting (or is there already) an issue for this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54317
Bug #: 54317
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: c45532m c45532n c45532o c45532p
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53420
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-08-18 23:50:21 UTC ---
On 15-Aug-12, at 4:16 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Can you still reproduce it?
My HP-UX 11.00 box had a disk failure a couple of weeks ago, so I can't
reproduce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
--- Comment #15 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com
2012-08-19 00:45:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
This line contains a bug:
strcpy(SQL1,select id, ' ', regexp_replace(str_last_name,' ','') as lastname,
' ',
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27972|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214
--- Comment #17 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com
2012-08-19 00:54:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I'm sorry. That is my falut and the problem was that I overflowed variables
size causing undefined behaviour. Now I kwon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54318
Bug #: 54318
Summary: [C++11] Bogus template instantiation depth exceeds
maximum error + segfault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28024|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
Bug #: 54319
Summary: Assignment to rvalue
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #140 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-19
05:55:26 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Aug 19 05:55:20 2012
New Revision: 190509
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190509
Log:
PR lto/45375
*
57 matches
Mail list logo