http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54426
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
06:40:32 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Sep 2 06:40:27 2012
New Revision: 190853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190853
Log:
2012-09-02 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54426
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42295
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02 07:07:50 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Sep 2 07:07:45 2012
New Revision: 190854
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190854
Log:
PR target/42295
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42295
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-02 08:01:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
What is the magic to avoid the -O in -O -O1 -fschedule-insns?
You can't. This is how currently gfortran testsuite works.
The part
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02 08:10:26 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Sep 2 08:10:21 2012
New Revision: 190855
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190855
Log:
PR target/36680
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-02 08:35:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
This went away with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181075
but was it really a fix for this, rather than just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02 08:49:37 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Sep 2 08:49:31 2012
New Revision: 190857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190857
Log:
PR target/49206
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-03-20 13:03:43 |2012-09-02
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-02 09:44:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Reconfirmed.
BTW: Moving the complex address to the temporary (as proposed in Comment #4)
would help
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Bug #: 54455
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 3
type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in
compute_bb_for_insn, at cfgrtl.c:418
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
Bug #: 54456
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in init_seqno, at
sel-sched.c:6797 with -fschedule-insns
-fselective-scheduling
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
10:36:31 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:36:27 2012
New Revision: 190858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190858
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
10:36:31 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:36:27 2012
New Revision: 190858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190858
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
10:36:31 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:36:27 2012
New Revision: 190858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190858
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
10:37:00 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:36:54 2012
New Revision: 190859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190859
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
10:37:52 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 2 10:37:49 2012
New Revision: 190860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190860
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
11:47:18 UTC ---
The patch is incorrect. There can't be a BARRIER in the middle of a basic
block. This problem typically indicates that either a BARRIER was emitted in
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46687
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-02 12:10:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
What does the insns list look like around the BARRIER? (From GDB do:
p debug_rtx_list(barrier_insn, -7) and show the result here.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54454
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
12:27:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(jump_insn 30 29 31 3 (simple_return) pr54455.c:16 -1
(nil)
- simple_return)
This should be BB_END(BASIC_BLOCK(3)). If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54457
Bug #: 54457
Summary: [x32] Fail to combine 64bit index + constant
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53942
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-02 13:57:01
UTC ---
The proposed patch from Comment #4 is not effective on 4.6 branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54445
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54290
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54445
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54455
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |abel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
Bug #: 54458
Summary: get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:830
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
--- Comment #1 from Francesco Zappa Nardelli francesco.zappa.nardelli at gmail
dot com 2012-09-02 15:42:45 UTC ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
--disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c
--prefix=/home/yquem/moscova/zappa/source/gcc-svn-bin
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120902 (experimental) (GCC)
and the exact error message now is:
input.c:3:1: internal compiler error: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:823
func_34 () {
^
Please submit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459
Bug #: 54459
Summary: [4.8 regression] Bootstrap fails with aliased to
undefined symbol
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54460
Bug #: 54460
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-3.C
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54458
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448
Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Marek Polacek polacek at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||polacek at
20120902 (experimental) (GCC) )
input-hand.c: In function 'func_34':
input-hand.c:5:6: internal compiler error: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:823
void func_34 (p_38) {
^
Please submit a full bug report.
Not sure that it helps, but while I was performing test-case reduction I
noticed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02 18:08:16
UTC ---
Likely a dup of PR 54453.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dougmencken at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54460
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-09-02 18:12:21
UTC ---
This uses yet another comment character.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
--- Comment #4 from Douglas Mencken dougmencken at gmail dot com 2012-09-02
18:13:40 UTC ---
Yes, looks like my bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54459
I can add that snapshot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461
Bug #: 54461
Summary: [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc
integration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462
Bug #: 54462
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Another segmentation fault after an
error in COMMON statement after r190853
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463
Bug #: 54463
Summary: -fdefault-real-8 does not promote the BLAS call when
using -fexternal-blas
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #15 from Ulrich Drepper drepper.fsp at gmail dot com 2012-09-02
20:04:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
libstdc++ should check if rdrand is supported by assembler
before using __builtin_ia32_rdrand32_step.
Every gcc feature
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54456
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
20:06:46 UTC ---
Any specialist of selective scheduling interested here? Otherwise:
Index: sched-rgn.c
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #13 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
22:43:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Kaz, would it be OK to remove the whole function 'sh_option_init_struct' from
gcc/common/sh/sh-common.c ?
Definitely.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #59 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
22:54:34 UTC ---
FWIW Martin: SRA blows up this test case's register pressure. Compiling with
SRA enabled takes ~900s, but with -fno-tree-sra compile time almost halves.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54418
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02 23:15:30
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Sep 2 23:15:25 2012
New Revision: 190864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190864
Log:
PR target/54418
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-02
23:18:11 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Sep 2 23:18:08 2012
New Revision: 190865
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190865
Log:
PR target/33135
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54460
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-02 23:41:30 UTC ---
On 2-Sep-12, at 2:12 PM, sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
This uses yet another comment character.
Thanks. I'll see if adding it to the regexp helps.
--
John David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
--- Comment #5 from Douglas Mencken dougmencken at gmail dot com 2012-09-03
02:12:01 UTC ---
Successfully bootstrapped with ``Revert a few Makefile.am regexps'' patch.
67 matches
Mail list logo