http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54523
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54518
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54208
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-08
09:23:00 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Sep 8 09:22:54 2012
New Revision: 191090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191090
Log:
fortran/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524
Bug #: 54524
Summary: Spurious add on sum of bitshifts
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #53 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-08
10:40:31 UTC ---
Please post the patch to the right list and I'll approve it, all libstdc++
patches need to go to the libstdc++ list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #54 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-08
11:00:36 UTC ---
I've tested the patch myself now, it's ok, please commit it asap (but in future
remember to send patches to the libstdc++ list as well as gcc-patches, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54525
Bug #: 54525
Summary: Recognize (vec_)cond_expr in mask operation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54506
--- Comment #2 from Nikolka tsoae at mail dot ru 2012-09-08 12:17:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
How are you calling g++?
/mingw-gcc-4.7.1/bin/g++ test.cpp -std=c++11
What version are you using?
Target: i686-pc-mingw32
Configured with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
--- Comment #2 from Nikolka tsoae at mail dot ru 2012-09-08 12:36:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Works fine with 4.6.3, 4.7.2 20120716 (prerelease) and
4.8.0 20120716 (experimental)
As requested when submitting the bug, please provide
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526
Bug #: 54526
Summary: :: is incorrectly treated as digraph : followed by
colon
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524
--- Comment #1 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-09-08
13:18:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 28152
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28152
testcase
The result is correct with -fno-forward-propagate
tUint64 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
--- Comment #3 from Nikolka tsoae at mail dot ru 2012-09-08 13:25:20 UTC ---
In both cases (for g++ v4.7.1 and v4.8.0) the only compiler option was
-std=c++11. Nothing magical.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54527
Bug #: 54527
Summary: wcout breaks on win32 console
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54527
--- Comment #1 from vurentjie vurentjie at gmail dot com 2012-09-08 14:19:45
UTC ---
i did try follow this deeper, but the __ostream_insert specialization for
wchar_t is not in ostream_insert.h,
but it seems to be declared in ostream-inst.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39572
--- Comment #4 from Rob rob1weld at aol dot com 2012-09-08 15:17:11 UTC ---
Thank you, one and all.
-prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu --enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --build=hppa-linux-gnu --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-java-gc=boehm --without-cloog --without-ppl
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada,lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120908 (experimental) [trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54529
Bug #: 54529
Summary: dead code elimination deletes code adressed by
referenced labels
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54529
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54528
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crowl at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54021
David Stone david at doublewise dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54530
Bug #: 54530
Summary: [4.8 regression] error: std::piecewise_construct
causes a section type conflict with
std::piecewise_construct
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54021
--- Comment #6 from Andy Lutomirski luto at mit dot edu 2012-09-08 22:29:17
UTC ---
I think that's correct. x isn't a standards-mandated constant expression, so
__builtin_constant_p depends on optimization level and probably shouldn't be
allowed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54531
Bug #: 54531
Summary: vpermilpd(x, 2 or 10) is a move
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54530
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-09
00:35:25 UTC ---
This is a compiler (back end) issue isn't it? That line of stl_pair.h cannot
change - C++11 spells it out exactly like that - and is very very old.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54532
Bug #: 54532
Summary: [C++0x][constexpr] internal error when initializing
static constexpr with pointer to non-static member
variable
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54532
--- Comment #1 from Chris cvs at cs dot utoronto.ca 2012-09-09 02:24:57 UTC
---
Created attachment 28155
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28155
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rbmj at verizon dot net
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54533
Bug #: 54533
Summary: breakpoint on C-style variadic function not hit at -O0
on amd64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
30 matches
Mail list logo