[Bug fortran/54725] cross gfortran always searches host paths (e.g. /usr/include)

2012-09-27 Thread xarthisius.kk at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725 Kacper Kowalik xarthisius.kk at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug preprocessor/54528] [4.8 Regression] system.h:288:78: error: integer overflow in expression

2012-09-27 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54528 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-09-27 07:06:51 UTC --- The bug is still present in gcc-4.8-20120923.

[Bug bootstrap/54688] [4.8 regression] violation of implicit restriction No_Elaboration_Code on a-ioexce.ads

2012-09-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688 --- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-27 07:57:04 UTC --- --- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-26 14:13:31 UTC --- Created attachment 28283

[Bug tree-optimization/54143] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 8% slower

2012-09-27 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54143 wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54710] moderately large tuple, with many gets, ballons compile time

2012-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/54709] [4.8 Regression] r191713 breaks Firefox build

2012-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709 --- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 09:11:23 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 27 09:11:18 2012 New Revision: 191798 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191798 Log:

[Bug lto/54709] [4.8 Regression] r191713 breaks Firefox build

2012-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/54717] [4.8 Regression] Runtime regression: polyhedron test rnflow degraded

2012-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 09:28:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) The slowdown is mostly hidden by -fno-tree-loop-if-convert. I would say this means we have more vectorization

[Bug c++/54427] Expose more vector extensions

2012-09-27 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 10:06:29 UTC --- Author: glisse Date: Thu Sep 27 10:06:23 2012 New Revision: 191800 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191800 Log: 2012-09-27 Marc

[Bug c/53024] Power of 2 requirement on vector_size not documented

2012-09-27 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53024 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 10:06:29 UTC --- Author: glisse Date: Thu Sep 27 10:06:23 2012 New Revision: 191800 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191800 Log: 2012-09-27 Marc

[Bug c/53024] Power of 2 requirement on vector_size not documented

2012-09-27 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53024 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at

[Bug tree-optimization/54717] [4.8 Regression] Runtime regression: polyhedron test rnflow degraded

2012-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 10:43:00 UTC --- I can reproduce the slowdown. Code differences appear first in early FRE, good ones like: - _84 = *a_56(D)[_83]; + _84 = _75; which was

[Bug target/54703] _mm_sub_pd is incorrectly substituted with vandnps

2012-09-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 10:48:14 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 27 10:48:07 2012 New Revision: 191801 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191801 Log: PR

[Bug target/54703] _mm_sub_pd is incorrectly substituted with vandnps

2012-09-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 10:53:47 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 27 10:53:42 2012 New Revision: 191802 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191802 Log: PR

[Bug target/54703] _mm_sub_pd is incorrectly substituted with vandnps

2012-09-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.3,

[Bug other/54726] New: libbacktrace segfaults on gcc_asserts with stripped gcc

2012-09-27 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54726 Bug #: 54726 Summary: libbacktrace segfaults on gcc_asserts with stripped gcc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/54727] New: [4.8 Regression] error: declaration of ‘UINT64_C’ must be available

2012-09-27 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54727 Bug #: 54727 Summary: [4.8 Regression] error: declaration of ‘UINT64_C’ must be available Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug other/54726] [4.8 Regression] libbacktrace segfaults on gcc_asserts with stripped gcc

2012-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54726 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug preprocessor/54528] [4.8 Regression] system.h:288:78: error: integer overflow in expression

2012-09-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54528 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/54728] New: [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

2012-09-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dim...@gmail.com gcc version 4.8.0 20120927 (experimental) [trunk revision 191799] (GCC) $ cat fun1.cpp #include sstream #include

[Bug middle-end/54683] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

2012-09-27 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54683 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/54727] [4.8 Regression] error: declaration of ‘UINT64_C’ must be available

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54727 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-27 12:02:09 UTC --- Could be a manifestation of PR52764. Please try to figure out whether stdint.h is also included before cstdint.

[Bug libstdc++/52764] Including cstdint after stdint.h fails to define limit macros

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/54727] [4.8 Regression] error: declaration of ‘UINT64_C’ must be available

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54727 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/54728] [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

2012-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug lto/54728] [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

2012-09-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-09-27 12:27:33 UTC --- for reduced test case: $ cp fun1.ii fun2.ii $ g++... $ cat fun1.ii class G; template typename, typename = G class A; class B { };

[Bug libstdc++/52764] Including cstdint after stdint.h fails to define limit macros

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-27 12:38:48 UTC --- I guess we should simply implement in stdint-wrap.h and stdint-gcc.h what Joseph recommended. It seems safer to me to conditionalize the change on

[Bug lto/54095] Unnecessary static variable renaming

2012-09-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 12:46:08 UTC --- Created attachment 28290 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28290 no-op patch This tries to only delay renaming all statics,

[Bug libstdc++/54727] [4.8 Regression] error: declaration of ‘UINT64_C’ must be available

2012-09-27 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54727 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 12:53:53 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Sep 27 12:53:46 2012 New Revision: 191806 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191806 Log:

[Bug libstdc++/54727] [4.8 Regression] error: declaration of ‘UINT64_C’ must be available

2012-09-27 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54727 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-09-27 12:56:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Could be a manifestation of PR52764. Please try to figure out whether stdint.h is also included before cstdint.

[Bug libstdc++/54727] [4.8 Regression] error: declaration of ‘UINT64_C’ must be available

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54727 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/54727] [4.8 Regression] error: declaration of ‘UINT64_C’ must be available

2012-09-27 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54727 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-09-27 12:59:37 UTC --- Created attachment 28291 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28291 preprocessed testfile

[Bug bootstrap/54688] [4.8 regression] violation of implicit restriction No_Elaboration_Code on a-ioexce.ads

2012-09-27 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688 --- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 13:28:12 UTC --- Hmm, strange. What if you just make a change like this: @@ -4600,8 +4600,7 @@ parse_add_or_inc (struct mem_inc_info *m if (!REG_P (SET_DEST

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-27 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org 2012-09-27 14:02:03 UTC --- Okay, I grabbed a copy of gcc-4.8-20120923, and started bootstrapping using an older 4.5.2 (since the 4.7.0 C++ compiler isn't working correctly; am

[Bug c++/54710] moderately large tuple, with many gets, ballons compile time

2012-09-27 Thread cppljevans at suddenlink dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710 --- Comment #8 from Larry Evans cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2012-09-27 14:03:25 UTC --- Created attachment 28292 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28292 with optimization set to -O1 for both gcc and clang Shows

[Bug c++/54710] moderately large tuple, with many gets, ballons compile time

2012-09-27 Thread cppljevans at suddenlink dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710 --- Comment #9 from Larry Evans cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2012-09-27 14:12:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Can you provide absolute compile-times The .out files show output of unix time command. Is that not what you mean by

[Bug c++/52764] Including cstdint after stdint.h fails to define limit macros

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/54725] cross gfortran always searches host paths (e.g. /usr/include)

2012-09-27 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725 Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug other/54726] [4.8 Regression] libbacktrace segfaults on gcc_asserts with stripped gcc

2012-09-27 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54726 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-09-27 15:36:30 UTC --- The segfault is a bug I will fix, but the fact that the backtrace doesn't work doesn't matter. We didn't have the backtrace information before, and we

[Bug other/54726] [4.8 Regression] libbacktrace segfaults on gcc_asserts with stripped gcc

2012-09-27 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54726 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-09-27 15:45:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) The segfault is a bug I will fix, but the fact that the backtrace doesn't work doesn't matter. We didn't have the

[Bug bootstrap/54688] [4.8 regression] violation of implicit restriction No_Elaboration_Code on a-ioexce.ads

2012-09-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-27 15:59:38 UTC --- --- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 13:28:12 UTC --- Hmm, strange. What if you

[Bug tree-optimization/54713] [4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53410-2.c

2012-09-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28280|0 |1

[Bug c++/54729] New: __compare_and_swap does not return on all paths

2012-09-27 Thread cvoica at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729 Bug #: 54729 Summary: __compare_and_swap does not return on all paths Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstreamchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar '

2012-09-27 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54729] __compare_and_swap does not return on all paths

2012-09-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 17:34:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) I had wrongly used the __compare_and_swap with a volatile bool variable and without the _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and _GLIBCXX_PARALLEL

[Bug libstdc++/34106] [parallel mode] Atomic operations compatibility layer needs cleanup

2012-09-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34106 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 17:37:46 UTC --- The compatibility.h header is still a complete mess with code we don't need, can I take this bug and clean it up? (In reply to comment #4) Note: I

[Bug libstdc++/34106] [parallel mode] Atomic operations compatibility layer needs cleanup

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34106 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/54228] [4.6 Regression] 22_locale/num_put/put/char/9780-2.cc

2012-09-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54228 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-27 17:41:43 UTC --- H.J. please either backport or close this. Thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/34106] [parallel mode] Atomic operations compatibility layer needs cleanup

2012-09-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34106 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/53135] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in value_format, at dwarf2out.c:8010

2012-09-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-oe-linux-gnueabi

[Bug c++/54710] moderately large tuple, with many gets, ballons compile time

2012-09-27 Thread cppljevans at suddenlink dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710 Larry Evans cppljevans at suddenlink dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28292|0 |1

[Bug other/54726] [4.8 Regression] libbacktrace segfaults on gcc_asserts with stripped gcc

2012-09-27 Thread ian at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54726 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 19:20:53 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Thu Sep 27 19:20:49 2012 New Revision: 191811 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191811 Log: PR

[Bug other/54726] [4.8 Regression] libbacktrace segfaults on gcc_asserts with stripped gcc

2012-09-27 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54726 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/54228] [4.6 Regression] 22_locale/num_put/put/char/9780-2.cc

2012-09-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54228 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug libstdc++/54228] [4.6 Regression] 22_locale/num_put/put/char/9780-2.cc

2012-09-27 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54228 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-27 21:00:24 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Sep 27 21:00:14 2012 New Revision: 191812 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191812 Log: Add test for

[Bug libstdc++/54228] [4.6 Regression] 22_locale/num_put/put/char/9780-2.cc

2012-09-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54228 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54730] New: ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1066

2012-09-27 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730 Bug #: 54730 Summary: ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1066 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/54730] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1066

2012-09-27 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/53922] [4.6 Regression] VRP: semantic conflict between range_includes_zero_p and value_inside_range

2012-09-27 Thread fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922 David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at

[Bug target/54083] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53922.c on *-apple-darwin*

2012-09-27 Thread fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083 David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at

[Bug target/54083] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53922.c on *-apple-darwin*

2012-09-27 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-27 21:33:32 UTC --- The patch in comment #5 should fix it.

[Bug lto/54705] ICE during custom LTO bootstrap with Ada enabled

2012-09-27 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54705 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug fortran/54730] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1066

2012-09-27 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-27 21:43:23 UTC --- The ICE occurs at tree gfc_typenode_for_spec (gfc_typespec * spec) { tree basetype; switch (spec-type) { case BT_UNKNOWN:

[Bug c++/54731] New: arm-elf/arm-eabisim crosses fails in make-check due to undefined LFE refrences

2012-09-27 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731 Bug #: 54731 Summary: arm-elf/arm-eabisim crosses fails in make-check due to undefined LFE refrences Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/54732] New: [4.8 regression] Installation failure: libbacktrace rebuilds upon install when built with make bootstrap-lean

2012-09-27 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54732 Bug #: 54732 Summary: [4.8 regression] Installation failure: libbacktrace rebuilds upon install when built with make bootstrap-lean Classification: Unclassified

[Bug bootstrap/54732] [4.8 regression] Installation failure: libbacktrace rebuilds upon install when built with make bootstrap-lean

2012-09-27 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54732 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED