http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
06:09:48 UTC ---
As a quick hack just for this testcase we might perhaps do something in jump
threading code, if we have a DEBUG stmt based on a PHI result and are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54808
Bug #: 54808
Summary: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment (with bit
fields)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
07:58:31 UTC ---
Thanks. The code generated for the testcase is certainly better on the SPARC
if lower-subreg doesn't split the DImode objects (which probably means
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54809
Bug #: 54809
Summary: gengtype ignore mark_hook in struct nested in union
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54809
--- Comment #1 from Basile Starynkevitch bstarynk at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 08:05:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 28354
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28354
patch to gengtype.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54804
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54809
--- Comment #2 from Basile Starynkevitch bstarynk at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 08:09:42 UTC ---
Run
gengtype -D -v \
-r gtype.state \
-P _g-basilemarkh.h basilemarkh.h
The bug appears on GCC 4.6, GCC 4.7 and GCC 4.8 (trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
08:15:37 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Oct 4 08:15:11 2012
New Revision: 192066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192066
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49754
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54807
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50356
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kazu at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-10-04 09:29:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
For some reason, -fselective-scheduling is moving
(insn 19 16 22 2 (use (reg/i:SI 0 ax)) testcase.c:6 -1
(nil))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-04 09:46:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 28355
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28355
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54810
Bug #: 54810
Summary: VRP doesn't handle comparison of narrowing cast like
comparison of BIT_AND_EXPR
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54810
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54810
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrbr at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557
--- Comment #16 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com 2012-10-04
11:17:00 UTC ---
Seems with LRA code is fast again
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
11:23:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 4 11:23:18 2012
New Revision: 192075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192075
Log:
2012-10-04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47799
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52859
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54801
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
11:48:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 4 11:48:21 2012
New Revision: 192078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192078
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54808
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54803
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52458
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54783
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54782
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52536
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-10-04 12:41:42 UTC ---
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-28
08:54:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-10-04 12:46:34 UTC ---
--- Comment #9 from gellert at dkrz dot de 2012-09-25 17:00:22 UTC ---
[...]
I agree that gcc/g++/... not adding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-04
13:43:48 UTC ---
It works for me on powerpc-apple-darwin8, powerpc-apple-darwin9 and
x86_64-apple-darwin10 (builds from fink). What is your *-apple-darwin*? and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 13:44:45 UTC ---
Note that, in a way, this 'double mangling' is not a bug but a feature.
It was introduced for PR 46313, in order to handle cases like the one below.
(There might be
/sem_attr.adb -o ada/sem_attr.o
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.8.0 20121004 (experimental) [trunk revision 192031] (x86_64-suse-linux) GCC
error:|
| tree code '�' is not supported in LTO streams|
| Error detected around
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54796
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52945
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-10-04 14:16:15 UTC
---
I have the following patch in my tree for some time now
PR gcc/52945
* testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr52634_0.c: skip the test on Darwin.
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077
--- Comment #15 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-10-04 14:25:29 UTC
---
I can reliably reproduce bug on Core 2.
Reverting 175752 reliably fixes bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812
Bug #: 54812
Summary: [C++11] Delete expression doesn't respect access of
defaulted destructor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54323
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54323
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 15:19:42 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 4 15:19:34 2012
New Revision: 192083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192083
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54323
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54424
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54794
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-10-04 15:34:04
UTC ---
This may be related to PR 54795.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53845
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53845
--- Comment #4 from Jeremiah Willcock jewillco at osl dot iu.edu 2012-10-04
15:43:30 UTC ---
I don't know whether it is valid or not after all of the trimming I did on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54144
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53845
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-04
15:55:26 UTC ---
Minimally, can somebody check clang? Lately we fixed quite a few error
reporting routines re-entered issues and if the testcase isn't even invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54101
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-04
15:57:07 UTC ---
*** Bug 54101 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-04 15:57:19 UTC ---
I will take a look how LTO can help us. I believe part of the problem should
be fixed by dropping the COMDAT hack for V1 API that is on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
16:07:19 UTC ---
I assume it is with linker plugin, right? In that case we need to track why
some of the functions do not become static.
There is bug in this right now,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-04 16:16:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I assume it is with linker plugin, right?
Yes.
I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54813
Bug #: 54813
Summary: NULL pointer conversion fails for template code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #2 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 16:33:00 UTC ---
I think in clear_unused_block_pointer, we already removed all block for debug
statements.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
16:38:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
No, look again - for some reason we skip debug stmts. That's obviously
a bug. Eric - mind testing the obvious patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54813
--- Comment #1 from tjablin at gmail dot com 2012-10-04 16:41:06 UTC ---
I have further simplified the testcase as follows:
templateclass T static void bar(T, char[][sizeof(T)]) {}
void baz() {
barint(0, 0); // succeeds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54813
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23055
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
16:43:37 UTC ---
Instead what happened is that I specifically restricted processing
DECL_DEBUG_EXPRs to local-vars in a previous fix. But it seems that
local vars
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
Bug #: 54814
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to
spill in class 'R0_REG'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #3 from Matt Arsenault whatmannerofburgeristhis at gmail dot com
2012-10-04 17:34:35 UTC ---
I'm using it from macports. OS X 10.8.2, x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0
$ g++ -std=c++11 testcase.cpp
Undefined symbols for architecture
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206
Matt Godbolt matt at godbolt dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54815
Bug #: 54815
Summary: [avr] missed optimization with operations with
constant operands
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
; 17mulqihi3[length = 3]
movw r24,r0
clr __zero_reg__
ret ; 29return[length = 1]
.identGCC: (GNU) 4.8.0 20121004 (experimental)
avr-gcc-4.7 was smarter with its code:
wmul:
lsl r22 ; 10*ashlqi3/5[length = 3]
lsl r22
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #16 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
18:32:26 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Oct 4 18:32:20 2012
New Revision: 192097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192097
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2012-10-04
18:50:52 UTC ---
This is the configure snippet glibc is using for this.
Someone with better autoconf-fu than me could add it
if test `cd $srcdir; /bin/pwd` =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50356
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54206
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #43 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-10-04 19:14:44
UTC ---
Those of you that use the uClinux elf2flt toolchain will find that
__stack_start is not correctly defined. This is due to a bug in the elf2flt.ld
linker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-10-04 19:17:46 UTC
---
I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program? (it improves the
scores in my setup, I would be curious to see how it compares to other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-04 19:40:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I assume you do see improvements with -O3 -fwhole-program? (it improves
the
scores in my setup, I would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-apple-darwin*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50356
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 20:58:33
UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Oct 4 20:58:30 2012
New Revision: 192103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192103
Log:
* PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50356
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53403
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-04
23:06:18 UTC ---
Works in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53403
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 23:19:52 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 4 23:19:46 2012
New Revision: 192108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192108
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53403
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52233
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-04
23:37:19 UTC ---
This works in 4.7.2 and mainline. I'm adding the testcase to mainline and
closing the PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54817
Bug #: 54817
Summary: Warning about extern declarations in C and C++ files.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52233
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-04 23:48:20 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 4 23:48:16 2012
New Revision: 192109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192109
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 23:50:16
UTC ---
Just for the record...
I've tried adding this pattern
Failed to match this instruction:
(parallel [
(set (reg:SI 166 [ D.42391+-3 ])
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo