http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55336
Bug #: 55336
Summary: Feature request : message output format XML
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55336
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #39 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com 2012-11-15
08:18:01 UTC ---
I agree with Kostya that no major changes to mach_override are necessary
because we are really going to dump it. However minor fixes required for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55336
--- Comment #2 from Clemens clemens1509 at web dot de 2012-11-15 08:24:41 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
I doubt this will be implemented. The format for GCC's warning and errors are
simple to parse as of right now. In fact GCC will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325
--- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 08:26:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Probably due to the fact that x86_64 defines TARGET_C_MODE_FOR_SUFFIX that
declares support for non-standard 'q' and 'w'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
08:44:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01198.html
Thanks. Note that pa handles 'q'.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55337
Bug #: 55337
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE tree check: expected sizeof_expr,
have alignof_expr in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:2608
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55337
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55337
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
10:27:49 UTC ---
Path posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01222.html
Can we figure out why the vectorization still does not happen?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55332
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clemens1509
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55336
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55330
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
10:52:13 UTC ---
OK, 4.7 vectorize two loops in the function in cptrf2
loop at ../a.f90:3538
if (nxtr 4) then
kerr = 1
do ixtr = 1, nxtr
Note though that this is not an assert. It just emits a message to
stderr. Do you think a better error message is appropriate? I'm not
sure the some data files may have been removed is an accurate
description of the issue. Perhaps something like Profile data file
mismatch may indicate corrupt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-11-15 10:56:53
UTC ---
Note though that this is not an assert. It just emits a message to
stderr. Do you think a better error message is appropriate? I'm not
sure the some data
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55338
Bug #: 55338
Summary: Incorrectly reported error in type name hiding
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
11:07:10 UTC ---
I think the problem is that we somehow make MEM_REF to be base...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55339
Bug #: 55339
Summary: Generated code hangs with -O2 on Linux ppc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55329
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55339
--- Comment #1 from anton.katilin at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 11:28:32 UTC ---
Compile with:
-
export PATH=/opt/gcc-4.7.2/bin:$PATH
g++ -m32 -fPIC -O2 *.cpp -o test-O2.bin
g++ -m32 -fPIC -O1 *.cpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55329
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55339
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55331
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55331
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44578
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55331
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55340
Bug #: 55340
Summary: Invalid maybe unitialized warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
Bug #: 55341
Summary: address-sanitizer and Fortran
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #40 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-15
13:46:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #39)
I agree with Kostya that no major changes to mach_override are necessary
because we are really going to dump it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55332
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-15 13:47:24 UTC ---
On 15-Nov-12, at 5:38 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
It doesn't break bootstrap any longer, configure.tgt should enable
it solely on
i?86/x86_64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #41 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-15
13:51:11 UTC ---
I will also post a small patch to gcc-patches to allow darwin to automatically
pass the required linker flags on the link spec in darwin.h...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #14 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-11-15 13:52:18 UTC ---
mattyclarkson at gmail dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit:
@Dodji, thanks for fixing this :)
You are welcome. Sorry for the delay.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300
--- Comment #19 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
14:04:10 UTC ---
The problem still is present, but when I asked Honza about the status on IRC,
he seemed to say the work-around patch was the correct fix -- that this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 14:11:54
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
That's strange but on x86 I see
CDPATH=${ZSH_VERSION+.}: cd ../../../libsanitizer /bin/sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55340
--- Comment #1 from Johnny Willemsen jwillemsen at remedy dot nl 2012-11-15
14:17:38 UTC ---
Lowering optimization from -O3 to -O2 removes the warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
--- Comment #9 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com 2012-11-15
14:25:42 UTC ---
Thanks, this helped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #25 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
14:34:10 UTC ---
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:56 AM, hubicka at ucw dot cz
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55339
--- Comment #2 from anton.katilin at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 14:35:12 UTC ---
An update:
There is no problem when linking statically, i.e. if we do
g++ -m32 -fPIC -O2 *.cpp -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -o test-O2.bin
instead of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #42 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-11-15 15:03:53 UTC ---
Jack,
Thanks for the patch in comment #37. I had to do some minor surgery to adjust
it to revision 193528, but otherwise it worked as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-11-15 15:07:33 UTC ---
Is the slowdown still reproducing with my patch?
Most of it (if not all) is gone with the patch:
23.96s with '-fprotect-parens -Ofast
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #43 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-15
15:12:31 UTC ---
Posted updated patch to adjust for bit-rot from the libsanitizer multilib
support checkin and add required spec handling to gcc/config/darwin.h.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342
Bug #: 55342
Summary: [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165
--- Comment #14 from Clemens clemens1509 at web dot de 2012-11-15 15:32:11
UTC ---
As describt in duplication Bug 55336 I would extend the xml for compound
messages p.e. a warning/error which points to 2 source positions like member
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54903
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
16:12:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 15 16:11:56 2012
New Revision: 193535
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193535
Log:
PR c++/54903
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
--- Comment #2 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 16:12:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 28699
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28699
function Assignment without 175752
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
--- Comment #3 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 16:16:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 28700
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28700
function Assignment with 175752
according to gprof Assignment is called
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325
--- Comment #15 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 16:23:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01198.html
Thanks. Note that pa handles
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55329
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54903
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55343
Bug #: 55343
Summary: Renamed C_PTR entities are not treated as equivalent
types.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54619
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15 16:50:04 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Nov 15 16:49:45 2012
New Revision: 193537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193537
Log:
2012-11-15 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54619
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
--- Comment #4 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 17:01:22 UTC ---
Bytemark source code
http://www.tux.org/~mayer/linux/nbench-byte-2.2.3.tar.gz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44578
--- Comment #6 from kl4yfd at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 17:05:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Using mmX as global registers variables is a user bug if you ever call
something that might be using FPU stack, because the registers can't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55321
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #44 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-15
17:53:40 UTC ---
Posted the final revision of the patch that now properly handles static linkage
options with -faddress-sanitizer...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #45 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15 17:58:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #35)
Is that certain to be soon enough
Not 100%. I am just warning you.
apologies for not much input to this - somewhat tied
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55344
Bug #: 55344
Summary: Cross compiling for alpha-linux fails because
signal.h doesn't exist
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55339
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55345
Bug #: 55345
Summary: ICE with abstract interface type with use-renamed
local names
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55322
--- Comment #2 from Wolf stilgarwolf at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 18:23:51 UTC
---
I know it's legal, but it may be suspicious, like many other legal statements
which are, optionally, warned.
Anyway, such optional warning may be helpful.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #46 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-15
18:28:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #45)
(In reply to comment #35)
Is that certain to be soon enough
Not 100%. I am just warning you.
apologies for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55321
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-15
18:47:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Are you really sure about the 20121028 date?
Yes, 4.8-20121012 aka r192660 built fine, 20121104 and 2012 failed;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55321
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
18:56:21 UTC ---
Yes, 4.8-20121012 aka r192660 built fine, 20121104 and 2012 failed;
unfortunately I don't have the 20121104 build log any more so I can't check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #47 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-15
19:09:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #46)
(In reply to comment #45)
(In reply to comment #35)
Is that certain to be soon enough
Not 100%. I am just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #48 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-15
19:19:06 UTC ---
As proof that the current mach_override.h and mach_override.c from current
compiler-rt svn are reasonable to use for gcc 4.8.0, I compiled the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48983
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-11-15 19:26:38 UTC ---
And this is not particularly useful: lto1: fatal error: short write.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55346
Bug #: 55346
Summary: var-tracking generates incomplete/inaccurate debug
info
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55346
--- Comment #1 from Michael Eager eager at eagercon dot com 2012-11-15
19:53:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 28704
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28704
Disassembly and location list
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55345
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55325
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
20:06:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
So, let's auto-detect support for non-standard suffixes in patch v2 [1].
[1]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48983
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15
20:29:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
libmudflap has the similar issue.
Actually the libmudflap is fixed by fixing libstdc++. Anyways I have a full
fix now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 20:31:18
UTC ---
Revision gave 193535:
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/c/c-parser.c: In function
\u2018c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary(c_parser*, unsigned int,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55347
Bug #: 55347
Summary: Specialized member of class template prevents
visibility setting
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55346
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Santos daniel.santos at pobox dot com 2012-11-15
21:56:02 UTC ---
First off, I apologize for my late response here.
(In reply to comment #5)
I'm going to respond a little backwards..
In fact, on ARM there
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55346
--- Comment #3 from Michael Eager eager at eagercon dot com 2012-11-15
22:36:58 UTC ---
Top of tree as of Oct 20, 2012. I'll update and verify.
On 11/15/2012 01:42 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #26 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-15
22:42:12 UTC ---
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:56 AM, hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55348
Bug #: 55348
Summary: Problem in tree-ssa-pre.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
URL: https://github.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #14 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
00:11:40 UTC ---
Can this be closed? Working fine on powerpc64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 00:34:07
UTC ---
Revision 193543 gave:
lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xb37547 crash_signal
../../src-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:334
0x6c0763
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55348
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860
Siddhesh Poyarekar siddhesh at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
03:36:35 UTC ---
here is the most reduced testcase.
cat foo1.cc EOF
templatetypename _CharT struct basic_string
{
struct _Rep {_CharT* _M_refdata() throw() {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55349
Bug #: 55349
Summary: arm-linux-androideabi-gcc-4.6: Internal compiler error
compiling libpng in debug mode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55349
--- Comment #1 from Ben Clapp ibenrunnin at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 03:44:38
UTC ---
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
I've hunted around Google for a good while, this is what I could find on the
subject (virtually no information of worth):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55349
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16
03:46:48 UTC ---
http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=20862
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55349
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55349
Ben Clapp ibenrunnin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
100 matches
Mail list logo