http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727
Bug #: 55727
Summary: better support for dynamic allocation of over-aligned
types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz kretz at kde dot org 2012-12-18 08:53:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 28992
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28992
simple testcase for std::vector
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436
Conrad conradsand.arma at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Kretz kretz at kde dot org 2012-12-18 09:11:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Right now it does not even suffice to reimplement new/delete inside Foo to
make
std::vectorFoo work.
Sorry, this statement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55716
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Haley aph at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 10:00:29
UTC ---
Author: aph
Date: Tue Dec 18 10:00:18 2012
New Revision: 194574
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194574
Log:
PR gcc/55716 [4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55716
Andrew Haley aph at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716
--- Comment #45 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
10:23:59 UTC ---
I've bisected this and the bug went away (or has gone latent) with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189915
There is a huge number of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
10:46:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Should this bug be upgraded to P2, given its wide ranging effects ?
If it was a serious problem it would have been reported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55717
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
10:50:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 18 10:50:47 2012
New Revision: 194575
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194575
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54114
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55718
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55717
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
11:35:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 28987 [details]
gcc48-pr55717.patch
Untested fix. Instead of returning very likely bogus value x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55726
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55717
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55726
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-12-18 11:39:22 UTC ---
no
gcc -Ofast -march=corei7 assign.c -std=c99
assign.c: In function ‘main’:
assign.c:9:21: error: incompatible types when initializing type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-18 12:06:21 UTC ---
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
10:30:12 UTC ---
So not a bug then?
I don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
12:09:52 UTC ---
If you don't add that /vol/gcc-4.4/lib/ to ld.so.conf (or ld.so.conf.d), it is
your responsibility to build with LD_LIBRARY_PATH, otherwise you are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-18 12:12:32 UTC ---
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
12:09:52 UTC ---
If you don't add that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728
Bug #: 55728
Summary: std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729
Bug #: 55729
Summary: Problem with sum intrinsic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55695
ojab ojab at ojab dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
12:46:52 UTC ---
Bumping the limit to assert on to off-by-two doesn't fix all cases (I can
hand you a testcase if you like...)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
13:12:39 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 18 13:12:34 2012
New Revision: 194578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194578
Log:
2012-12-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz kretz at kde dot org 2012-12-18 13:26:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #0)
Right now it does not even suffice to reimplement new/delete inside Foo to
make
std::vectorFoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-12-18 13:39:45 UTC
---
Bumping the limit to assert on to off-by-two doesn't fix all cases (I can
hand you a testcase if you like...)
Yep, i guess it just depends on how many
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
13:47:34 UTC ---
Can somebody please test this on ppc? I'll bootstrap/regtest it on
x86_64-linux and i686-linux momentarily.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730
Bug #: 55730
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at
dwarf2out.c:12725
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731
Bug #: 55731
Summary: Issue with complete innermost loop unrolling
(cunrolli)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2012-12-18
14:23:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 28997
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28997
testcase1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2012-12-18
14:24:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 28998
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28998
testcase2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55201
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
14:28:31 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Dec 18 14:28:24 2012
New Revision: 194581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194581
Log:
libgo: Link
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
14:37:47 UTC ---
Reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
14:39:55 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 18 14:39:49 2012
New Revision: 194582
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194582
Log:
2012-12-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55201
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
14:51:11 UTC ---
Reduced with a cross from x86_64 configured with --target=powerpc64-suse-linux
--with-cpu-64=power4 --enable-secureplt --with-long-double-128
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55565
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436
Conrad conradsand.arma at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.2 |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55724
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-12-18 15:11:38
UTC ---
This is what we changed in reload for stack realignment:
diff --git a/gcc/reload1.c b/gcc/reload1.c
index f28b01c..9b81062 100644
--- a/gcc/reload1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55679
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-12-18
15:15:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
I am puzzled as to why this issue with global-overflow-1.c and
stack-overflow-1.c can't be triggered on x86_64 linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55732
Bug #: 55732
Summary: -fno-automatic: Doesn'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52588
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
Bug #: 55733
Summary: -fno-automatic: Fails for scalar allocatables
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:19:55 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Dec 18 15:19:43 2012
New Revision: 194583
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194583
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:20:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 55732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55732
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55045
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:24:16 UTC ---
The following test case also fails; I think the problem is the string
components which isn't marked as TREE_STATIC:
! { dg-do run }
! { dg-options
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:26:50 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Dec 18 15:26:27 2012
New Revision: 194584
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194584
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:29:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
If it was a serious problem it would have been reported before by more
people.
I'm not sure if the degree of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
Bug #: 55734
Summary: gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC
compilers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-12-18 15:40:34
UTC ---
It's hard to say in case of Firefox, because the only thing
that one can reliably measure is the JavaScript performance.
And this varies only very
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:45:17 UTC ---
I have a proposed patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00766.html
...which was deemed not sexy at all. So perhaps Richard or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #3 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-12-18
15:49:03 UTC ---
In that thread, I had asked:
---
If you prefer, I can simply inline the popcount/clz functionality into
gcov-io.c directly (or at least when not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:52:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
In that thread, I had asked:
---
If you prefer, I can simply inline the popcount/clz functionality into
gcov-io.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
15:53:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
In that thread, I had asked:
---
If you prefer, I can simply inline the popcount/clz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
Bug #: 55735
Summary: ICE with deferred-length strings in COMMON
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
16:19:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28999
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28999
proposed patch
Oh, I didn't realize we always had the HWI variants
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
16:22:11 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Dec 18 16:21:57 2012
New Revision: 194586
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194586
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #7 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-12-18
16:24:13 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:53 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729
--- Comment #2 from pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com 2012-12-18 16:25:01 UTC ---
Hi Tobias,
I use gfortran 4.7.0. It was build and installed by our admin, as you can see
below :
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28999|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #9 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-12-18
16:31:08 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:25 AM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
16:39:47 UTC ---
OK,
we are inlining
Inline summary for bool C::c1(float, float)/7 inlinable
self time: 34
global time: 34
self size: 18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com 2012-12-18
16:48:40 UTC ---
Ah yes, now I remember. Yes, there is a problem with libgcov.a. I
wasn't seeing it because I was only building cc1. You are correct
Teresa, that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-12-18 17:03:52 UTC ---
I did some measurements with tramp3d and in this case
the default (999) gives the best performance:
par. sizetime
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
17:15:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 29001
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29001
proposed patch
OK,
we know the argument is constant
addr_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-12-18 17:25:37
UTC ---
I did some measurements with tramp3d and in this case
the default (999) gives the best performance:
par. sizetime
999
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50148
--- Comment #6 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-12-18 17:26:54 UTC
---
Applying the supplied patch reveals another issue underneath, which is a false
positive:
/work/mhargett/gcc-trunk-obj/./prev-gcc/xg++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 17:30:55
UTC ---
I did a quick test on powerpc-ibm-aix and the patch seems to fix the problem.
You should have access to a lot of PPC systems for testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55724
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz kretz at kde dot org 2012-12-18 18:20:00
UTC ---
Created attachment 29002
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29002
support for over-aligned types in new_allocator
I finished my allocator to fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727
Matthias Kretz kretz at kde dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29002|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-12-18 19:42:59
UTC ---
LRA doesn't handle HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_FRAME_POINTER at all.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18
20:04:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Postscript: The example in comment 0 mixes a scalar and an array pointers.
While the ICE occurs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55726
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|marc.glisse at ens dot fr |glisse at
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo