http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #16 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 08:17:15 UTC ---
After testing on CP2K, I believe that ASAN yields a false positive (current
trunk). It is obviously hard to be sure, but the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #17 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
08:37:21 UTC ---
For whatever reason the fortran code is touching asan's shadow:
Address 0x16742e2c is located in the high shadow area.
What is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
08:42:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
After testing on CP2K, I believe that ASAN yields a false positive (current
trunk). It is obviously hard to be sure, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #19 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 08:48:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
For whatever reason the fortran code is touching asan's shadow:
Address 0x16742e2c is located in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #20 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
08:51:54 UTC ---
For whatever reason the fortran code is touching asan's shadow:
Address 0x16742e2c is located in the high shadow area.
What is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
08:52:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
For whatever reason the fortran code is touching asan's shadow:
Address 0x16742e2c is located in the high shadow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #22 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 08:59:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
And this is no reason at all, for most string/memory intrinsics asan
instruments them just by pretending
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
09:03:13 UTC ---
Example testcase:
void bar (char *, char *, char *, char *, char *, char *, char *, char *, char
*, char *,
char *, char *, char *, char
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
09:03:46 UTC ---
My patch is wrong. It might lead to passing an integer(8) instead of integer(4)
as hidden argument when calling a procedure. The proper way it to use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #24 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 09:06:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Example testcase:
looks definitely like what Fortran subroutines with 100 optional arguments
might
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39464
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2012-12-19
09:17:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The reason is that unrolling early can be harmful to for example vectorization
and thus cunrolli restricts itself to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
09:21:20 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Dec 19 09:21:17 2012
New Revision: 194604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194604
Log:
2012-12-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55636
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
09:21:21 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Dec 19 09:21:17 2012
New Revision: 194604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194604
Log:
2012-12-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55636
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
09:43:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Ah yes, now I remember. Yes, there is a problem with libgcov.a. I
wasn't seeing it because I was only building cc1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20097
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20018
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20097
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
10:07:41 UTC ---
*** Bug 20018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
10:27:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
The reason is that unrolling early can be harmful to for example
vectorization
and thus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737
--- Comment #2 from GS greenscape777 at gmail dot com 2012-12-19 10:31:45 UTC
---
Hey Andrew. You words completely logical,. But I think it can be avoided when
condition can be calculated during compilation. Though it's only my opinion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #25 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
10:32:29 UTC ---
So, to fix this, either libasan should for memset ignore any diagnostics for
stores into shadow memory area,
That's not a good choice. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de 2012-12-19
10:40:30 UTC ---
Ok, long standing issue caused by the transition to g++ as bootstrap compiler.
Here's the status for gcc-4.7.3 rev. 194494 on x86_64-w64-mingw32:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de 2012-12-19
10:50:15 UTC ---
Last Chunk is not part of the patch, it's for a different issue, see PR55707.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55736
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de 2012-12-19
10:55:55 UTC ---
Here's the status for gcc-4.8.0 rev. 194494 on x86_64-w64-mingw32:
g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-W
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55736
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
11:28:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 29005
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29005
patch
Patch I am testing (works for the testcase).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
11:42:34 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Dec 19 11:42:30 2012
New Revision: 194606
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194606
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
11:47:06 UTC ---
The acutal ICE should be fixed. Martinj, I will leave the PR open just to make
you to double check that ipa-cp is doing properly the translation from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
11:58:33 UTC ---
I don't think so: even on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, when building an
i686-unknown-linux-gnu compiler with an unbundled gcc 4.4 (which does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
12:04:19 UTC ---
Given that -static-libstdc++ has been added to trunk in 2009-06-25, and gcc 4.4
has been branched 2009-03-27, you'd need to have local patches on top of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55738
Bug #: 55738
Summary: missed memory store optimization.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
12:17:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 19 12:16:56 2012
New Revision: 194607
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194607
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55738
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55703
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
12:37:53 UTC ---
Happens to be fixed by the fix for PR55736.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-19 12:58:32 UTC ---
On 19-Dec-12, at 5:54 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Or is it libgfortran itself that when built with r189365 works and
when r189366
doesn't? If so,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
13:07:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #10)
Ah yes, now I remember. Yes, there is a problem with libgcov.a. I
wasn't seeing it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55739
Bug #: 55739
Summary: asan doesn't work on common symbols
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55726
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-12-19 13:25:16 UTC ---
I understand your concern, Marc.
I think that the compiler shall either prefer double or produce
error: call of overloaded 'f(float)' is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55739
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
13:26:34 UTC ---
That is not a bug, it can't. Asan needs to insert padding after it, but you
don't know if the symbol will be defined by the current CU, or some other,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55739
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-12-19 13:42:12
UTC ---
If upper address or size of the common symbol is
available to ASAN at compile time as a special
symbol generated by assembler/linker, will it
help?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55739
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
13:49:35 UTC ---
That would look like too big hack.
Perhaps we could emit the common symbols as .bss .weak objects with padding,
and register as global a local alias to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786
--- Comment #4 from Hristo Venev mustrumr97 at gmail dot com 2012-12-19
13:51:08 UTC ---
That bug was fixed. However there is still another one:
templateclass... Data
struct List{};
templateclass T, class... Ts
using Tail=ListTs...;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55736
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
13:53:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 19 13:53:18 2012
New Revision: 194609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194609
Log:
2012-12-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55703
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
13:53:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 19 13:53:18 2012
New Revision: 194609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194609
Log:
2012-12-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55703
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55736
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
-typedefs -Wno-long-long
-version -fomit-frame-pointer -fmessage-length=0 -o tDirectories.s
GNU C++ (SUSE Linux) version 4.8.0 20121219 [trunk revision 194606]
(i586-suse-linux)
compiled by GNU C version 4.8.0 20121219 [trunk revision 194606], GMP
version 5.0.5, MPFR version 3.1.1, MPC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55740
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #27 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
14:29:12 UTC ---
This time it looks like a valid error report (stack buffer overflow), but asan
crashes while reporting it.
Take a look at DescribeAddressIfStack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
14:33:13 UTC ---
I'd say as a first step try to make sure -lasan is linked at the very
beginning, before all other libraries, there are numerous libasan crashes if it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-19 14:33:55 UTC ---
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
12:04:19 UTC ---
Given that -static-libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #29 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 14:36:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
This time it looks like a valid error report (stack buffer overflow), but asan
crashes while reporting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55740
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
14:44:02 UTC ---
Reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55740
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i?86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #16 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-12-19
15:07:54 UTC ---
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:07 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55740
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
Bug #: 55741
Summary: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails in
libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
15:29:21 UTC ---
Happens in quite some packages for us: clisp, evince, pstoedit and ruby19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
15:54:22 UTC ---
(Your testcase would be a lot easier to read without all those comments inside
the conditional expression, I think it's safe to assume everyone here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #30 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 15:57:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
I'd say as a first step try to make sure -lasan is linked at the very
beginning, before all other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #31 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 16:08:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
This time it looks like a valid error report (stack buffer overflow), but asan
crashes while reporting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737
--- Comment #4 from GS greenscape777 at gmail dot com 2012-12-19 16:11:11 UTC
---
Always nice to read friendly replies :). Sure I could. As I said, I'm not sure
I was right in the first place. Just wanted to help to make gcc better than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
16:13:08 UTC ---
because it doesn't instantiate a template that requires the divide-by-zero in
an integer constant context
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36044
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #18 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-12-19
16:44:21 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:25 AM, hubicka at ucw dot cz
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742
Bug #: 55742
Summary: __attribute__ in class function declaration cause
prototype does not match errors.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
16:48:00 UTC ---
Perhaps
if (v 0)
{
#if IN_LIBGCOV
r = 63 - __builtin_clzll (v);
#else
if (sizeof (v) = sizeof (HOST_WIDE_INT))
r =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
16:57:31 UTC ---
Of course v HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT can't be assigned to r, it needs some new
temporary, with unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT or gcov_type_unsigned type (and use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55739
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-12-19 16:58:34
UTC ---
The symbol size is always available at link-time or run-time.
We just never find a use for it in program itself. We can add
relocations for foo@BOUND,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #20 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-12-19
17:07:51 UTC ---
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:39 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Benson abensonca at gmail dot com 2012-12-19
17:31:47 UTC ---
The fix for this bug has been working for me, but I'm getting reports from
several colleagues (who are trying to install the FoX library so that they
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
--- Comment #21 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-12-19
17:35:08 UTC ---
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:48 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55743
Bug #: 55743
Summary: limits.h included unnecessarily in libgcc2.c - can
break --without-headers bootstrap
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55743
--- Comment #1 from Wookey wookey at wookware dot org 2012-12-19 17:54:16 UTC
---
Created attachment 29008
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29008
Remove unnecessary limits.h references in libgcc2.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #32 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-12-19 18:00:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
I'd say as a first step try to make sure -lasan is linked at the very
beginning, before all other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Benson abensonca at gmail dot com 2012-12-19
18:02:44 UTC ---
I spoke to soon! I just compiled r194618 of gcc and now I find the same
problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-12-19
18:03:23 UTC ---
Thanks Daniel for the new testcase in Comment #6. I'm afraid however we still
don't have a regression, because the testcase compiles but doesn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55722
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
20:14:08 UTC ---
I've just encountered this bug again when trying to replace
constexpr unique_ptr(nullptr_t) noexcept
: _M_t()
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
20:35:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 29009
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29009
check for and use Sleep()
Does this patch work?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55699
Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55744
Bug #: 55744
Summary: Use of ebx as output register in inline asm on x86_64
PIC mcmodel=medium
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55724
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
22:22:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 19 22:22:36 2012
New Revision: 194620
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194620
Log:
PR c++/55724
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55745
Bug #: 55745
Summary: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr26246_2.f90 -O
scan-tree-dump-times original static int 0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-19
23:05:54 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Dec 19 23:05:49 2012
New Revision: 194621
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194621
Log:
2012-12-19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742
Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55746
Bug #: 55746
Summary: vfprintf behaves differently variable on stack vs
const argument.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55746
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
