[Bug rtl-optimization/55838] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn (unrecognizable insn) with -O -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 --- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-01-02 08:30:26 UTC --- Alexandre, do you plan to proceed with the patch in Comment #4?

[Bug middle-end/55832] [4.8 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1967

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55832 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN: Fortran/OMP yields false positives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 --- Comment #29 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com 2013-01-02 09:09:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) (In reply to comment #26) For config/linux/ptrlock the changes are: [...] Following your suggestions, I applied

[Bug c++/54526] [C++11] :: is incorrectly treated as digraph : followed by colon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] New: 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 Bug #: 55845 Summary: 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run Classification: Unclassified

[Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN: Fortran/OMP yields false positives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 09:43:29 UTC --- The formatting in the patch is wrong (multiple issues). I don't see a point in the __atomic_load_n (addr, MEMMODEL_RELAXED), for aligned ints or

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vbyakovl23

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-01-02 10:15:16 UTC --- It looks to me that scheduler is doing something with unspec_volatile instructions, since vzeroupper insertion will be cancelled if there are live

[Bug bootstrap/55784] [4.8 regression] declaration of C function 'const char* strsignal(int)' conflicts with /usr/include/string.h:112: error: previous declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug sanitizer/55561] TSAN: Fortran/OMP yields false positives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561 --- Comment #31 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com 2013-01-02 10:28:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) The formatting in the patch is wrong (multiple issues). I don't see a point in the __atomic_load_n (addr,

[Bug tree-optimization/55823] [4.8 Regression] ice in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:270

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55823 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/55833] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1582 (BB should be marked irreducible !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55833 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/55842] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 ICE with boost multi-precision and boost variant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55842 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/55840] valgrind errors in sparseset.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55840 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/54728] [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/55802] Various missed optimizations for a simple function in GCC itself

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 11:00:54 UTC --- The sink issue is that we cannot sink PHI nodes: bb 4: ... if (_11 _20) goto bb 5; else goto bb 6; bb 5: _26 =

[Bug tree-optimization/55846] New: Cannot sink conditional code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55846 Bug #: 55846 Summary: Cannot sink conditional code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/55802] Various missed optimizations for a simple function in GCC itself

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/55802] Various missed optimizations for a simple function in GCC itself

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 11:13:52 UTC --- Note that SCCVN already value-numbers both loads the same (but for some reason _not_ the dependent calculation ...). This we track here. Ah,

[Bug tree-optimization/55833] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1582 (BB should be marked irreducible !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55833 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 11:22:00 UTC --- Cannot reproduce with xgcc (GCC) 4.6.4 20130102 (prerelease).

[Bug tree-optimization/55833] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1582 (BB should be marked irreducible !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55833 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 11:30:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Cannot reproduce with xgcc (GCC) 4.6.4 20130102 (prerelease). Make sure to have checking enabled.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55833] [4.6/4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1582 (BB should be marked irreducible !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55833 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization

[Bug bootstrap/55784] [4.8 regression] declaration of C function 'const char* strsignal(int)' conflicts with /usr/include/string.h:112: error: previous declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 11:57:36 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 2 11:57:31 2013 New Revision: 194804 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194804 Log: 2013-01-02

[Bug bootstrap/55784] [4.8 regression] declaration of C function 'const char* strsignal(int)' conflicts with /usr/include/string.h:112: error: previous declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/55780] effective targets arm_arch_v*_multilib are not strict enough

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780 gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gretay at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/55847] New: mistake bad_weak_ptr::what() message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55847 Bug #: 55847 Summary: mistake bad_weak_ptr::what() message Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/55172] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on invalid: gfc_variable_attr(): Bad array reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55172 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at

[Bug lto/54728] [4.8 regression] ICE in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:254

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728 --- Comment #13 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-01-02 13:47:43 UTC --- fix original problem for me too Thank You

[Bug libstdc++/55728] std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 14:18:24 UTC --- Maybe for consistency with bad_weak_ptr it should return bad_function_call without the std:: qualification (see Bug 55847)

[Bug lto/55848] New: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed (with `-flto' and `-fopenmp')

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848 Bug #: 55848 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed (with `-flto' and `-fopenmp') Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/55804] [4.7/4.8 regression] GCC omits required call to constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/55848] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed (with `-flto' and `-fopenmp')

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug lto/55848] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed (with `-flto' and `-fopenmp')

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 15:18:47 UTC --- Reduced C testcase: extern int omp_get_thread_num (void); void __attribute ((noinline)) f() { omp_get_thread_num(); } int main() {

[Bug lto/55848] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed (with `-flto' and `-fopenmp')

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/55818] Reading a REAL from a file which doesn't end in a new line fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55818 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 17:09:17 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Jan 2 17:09:09 2013 New Revision: 194809 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194809 Log:

[Bug libfortran/49791] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Formatted namelist reads fails with: Cannot match namelist object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug libfortran/50105] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with g6.5 - wrong number of ** shown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug sanitizer/55844] -fsanitize=address -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -m64 doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844 --- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 17:31:05 UTC --- we should just move over to using the dwarf unwinder and forget about the manually unwinding the stack Upstream asan-rt has two flags now:

[Bug middle-end/23868] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] builtin_apply uses wrong mode for multi-hard-register return values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4

[Bug c++/48914] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored -Wc++0x-compat doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48914 --- Comment #7 from Roger Jarrett rjarrett at mathworks dot com 2013-01-02 18:51:12 UTC --- Additional workaround (big hammer) #pragma GCC system_header Best used when the code generating the warning is in an isolated header file

[Bug c++/55804] [4.7/4.8 regression] GCC omits required call to constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 19:03:17 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:04 2013 New Revision: 194811 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194811 Log: PR c++/55804

[Bug c++/55245] [4.6 Regression] Compiler segfault when compiling a small test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 19:03:17 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:04 2013 New Revision: 194811 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194811 Log: PR c++/55804

[Bug c++/55032] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1199

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 19:03:19 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:04 2013 New Revision: 194811 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194811 Log: PR c++/55804

[Bug c++/55032] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1199

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 19:03:55 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:37 2013 New Revision: 194812 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194812 Log: PR c++/55804

[Bug c++/55032] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1199

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 19:04:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:46 2013 New Revision: 194813 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194813 Log: PR c++/55804

[Bug c++/55245] [4.6 Regression] Compiler segfault when compiling a small test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 19:03:55 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:37 2013 New Revision: 194812 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194812 Log: PR c++/55804

[Bug c++/55804] [4.7/4.8 regression] GCC omits required call to constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 19:03:57 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:37 2013 New Revision: 194812 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194812 Log: PR c++/55804

[Bug c++/55804] [4.7/4.8 regression] GCC omits required call to constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 19:04:10 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:46 2013 New Revision: 194813 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194813 Log: PR c++/55804

[Bug c++/55245] [4.6 Regression] Compiler segfault when compiling a small test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 19:04:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 19:03:46 2013 New Revision: 194813 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194813 Log: PR c++/55804

[Bug libfortran/48785] BOZ editing of real numbers not working with -std=f2008

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55804] [4.7/4.8 regression] GCC omits required call to constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55804 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55818] Reading a REAL from a file which doesn't end in a new line fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55818 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 20:29:35 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Jan 2 20:29:28 2013 New Revision: 194819 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194819 Log:

[Bug libfortran/50105] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with g6.5 - wrong number of ** shown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 20:46:02 UTC --- Based on the interp, current gfortran is acceptable and we can close this PR.

[Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 20:54:46 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 20:54:42 2013 New Revision: 194820 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194820 Log: PR c++/54325

[Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 20:56:37 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 2 20:56:29 2013 New Revision: 194821 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194821 Log: PR c++/54325

[Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/55844] -fsanitize=address -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -m64 doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 21:07:21 UTC --- Could you please do an extra merge soon, even before switching the default? You've raised some cases where on ubuntu _Unwind_* based backtrace wasn't

[Bug middle-end/55198] [4.8 Regression] libquadmath/math/fmaq.c:233:7: internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55198 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-02 21:14:22 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Wed Jan 2 21:14:13 2013 New Revision: 194822 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194822 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/55198] [4.8 Regression] libquadmath/math/fmaq.c:233:7: internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55198 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/50105] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with g6.5 - wrong number of ** shown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105 Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx

[Bug fortran/55849] New: [OOP] Implement temporary support for SELECT TYPE(name = array ( [vector-subscript] ))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55849 Bug #: 55849 Summary: [OOP] Implement temporary support for SELECT TYPE(name = array ( [vector-subscript] )) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug fortran/55850] New: [OOP] SELECT TYPE issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55850 Bug #: 55850 Summary: [OOP] SELECT TYPE issues Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid,

[Bug fortran/55850] [OOP] SELECT TYPE issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55850 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug target/43961] [ARM thumb] branch out of range with thumb1_output_casesi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961 --- Comment #8 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 00:00:08 UTC --- Mikael, ping on this patch from June 2010 ... what happened in testing? And shouldn't this bug be marked as a regression, given the identification of

[Bug middle-end/55851] New: ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 Bug #: 55851 Summary: ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/55852] New: internal compiler error: in gfc_build_intrinsic_call, at fortran/expr.c:4647

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852 Bug #: 55852 Summary: internal compiler error: in gfc_build_intrinsic_call, at fortran/expr.c:4647 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/55853] New: [C++11] ICE calling member function of templated class in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55853 Bug #: 55853 Summary: [C++11] ICE calling member function of templated class in lambda Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug c++/55853] [C++11] ICE calling member function of templated class in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55853 --- Comment #1 from Kyle Konrad kyle.t.konrad at gmail dot com 2013-01-03 01:13:26 UTC --- I forgot to mention that adding this- to the Insert() call causes compilation to succeed.

[Bug c++/55853] [C++11] ICE calling member function of templated class in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55853 --- Comment #2 from Kyle Konrad kyle.t.konrad at gmail dot com 2013-01-03 01:15:56 UTC --- Version information: $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug middle-end/55851] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 01:28:28 UTC --- What options are you using and what is the target?

[Bug middle-end/55851] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 01:33:19 UTC --- This works for me on x86_64-linux-gnu with revision 194774.

[Bug middle-end/55851] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/55851] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 01:42:37 UTC --- Confirmed reduced testcase: enum { A=1 } something = A; void test(void) { char found_bit_mask[1][something]; found_bit_mask[0][0] = 1; }

[Bug middle-end/55851] [4.8 Regression] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/55854] New: ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854 Bug #: 55854 Summary: ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug libgcj/50895] Build failure in jni.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895 Nicholas Wourms nwourms at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nwourms

[Bug sanitizer/55844] -fsanitize=address -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -m64 doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55844 --- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 06:17:38 UTC --- Could you please do an extra merge soon, even before switching the default? I'll start somewhere after Jan 10. (I am on holidays before that. There

[Bug fortran/55855] New: incorrect warning with type-bound procedure pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855 Bug #: 55855 Summary: incorrect warning with type-bound procedure pointer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal