http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
08:52:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 3 08:52:10 2013
New Revision: 194834
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194834
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-01-03
08:54:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Mikael, ping on this patch from June 2010 ... what happened in testing?
I've included this patch in my local 4.6-based
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55832
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 08:56:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I've slightly adjusted the testcase, so that it at least doesn't violate
strict
aliasing, unfortunately without the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55832
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
09:02:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 3 09:02:41 2013
New Revision: 194836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194836
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
09:05:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 3 09:05:43 2013
New Revision: 194837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194837
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55832
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] incorrect warning |[OOP] incorrect warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.6/4.7/4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
09:45:26 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 3 09:45:18 2013
New Revision: 194839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194839
Log:
2013-01-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55848
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856
Bug #: 55856
Summary: ICE on tuple with rvalue ref member
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55857
Bug #: 55857
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55857
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55857
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
10:50:26 UTC ---
One that reproduces the checking failure:
void foo (int *data, unsigned len, const int qlp_coeff[],
unsigned order, int lp, int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-01-03
11:01:18 UTC ---
Revision 162456 (2010-07-23) is OK, revision 1635293 (2010-08-24) gives a
segmentation fault.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-01-03
11:13:19 UTC ---
gfc_build_intrinsic_call has been introduced at revision 162648.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de 2013-01-03
12:15:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Please post patch to ML. That is a trivial one.
Btw do you have made already paper-work with FSF?
Patch posted to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55858
Bug #: 55858
Summary: When scalarizing contiguous whole-arrays, consider
folding into a single loop
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55859
Bug #: 55859
Summary: Mention -Og/-Ofast in error: argument to '-O' should
be a non-negative integer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55857
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
12:34:39 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 3 12:34:34 2013
New Revision: 194850
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194850
Log:
2013-01-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55857
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55859
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
12:55:23 UTC ---
For another failure, see PR 55854.
(In reply to comment #10)
I have a simple case where CLASS(*) leads to an ICE.
If it doesn't fit here, please
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
13:03:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Proposed patch:
Which fails with
gfc_typename(): Undefined type
for
contains
subroutine foo
type t
end type t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
13:03:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I think it's the same as PR55763 comment 10.
Seemingly not - at least with the patch from PR55763 comment 12, this example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de 2013-01-03
13:28:51 UTC ---
Patch posted to the ML http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00114.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
Bug #: 55860
Summary: Turn segmented iteration into nested loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55861
Bug #: 55861
Summary: [C++11] `std::shared_future::get' is not
const-qualified
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com
Hi ! The following testcase makes GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130103 crash at -O2.
It may be related to PR55348 (which was probably a dup anyway).
$ cat antic.c
int g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55861
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863
Bug #: 55863
Summary: Fails to fold (i + 2) - (i + 1) to 1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
14:46:54 UTC ---
The problem seems to be the gfc_class_null_initializer, where ts is
unlimited polymorphic and init_expr is of type __class__$tar_a (and
EXPR_NULL). The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55864
Bug #: 55864
Summary: Optimization cause asm code to wrong behaviour
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55864
--- Comment #1 from beldmit at nm dot ru 2013-01-03 15:10:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 29077
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29077
The bug representation code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55864
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55865
Bug #: 55865
Summary: [4.8 Regression] vect-outer-fir-big-array.c vectorizer
failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55865
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
15:44:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
+ c-ts.type = ts-type = BT_VOID;
Ups. The ts-type = has to be deleted to fix the failure of comment 13.
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55857
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
15:57:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 3 15:57:15 2013
New Revision: 194856
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194856
Log:
2013-01-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55865
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 16:15:07 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Jan 3 16:14:54 2013
New Revision: 194857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194857
Log:
2013-01-03 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[ARM thumb] branch out of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55862
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55853
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55348
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55823
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55823
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:26:16 UTC ---
The following patch to devirtualize before updating jump functions solves the
testcase but I am not at all sure it is correct.
Index: ipa-prop.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:29:49 UTC ---
Martin, I guess this is yours. I have no idea here ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:32:04 UTC ---
Ehm. (In reply to comment #8)
Created attachment 29078 [details]
gcc48-pr55851.patch
Untested patch (which I don't like very much, but we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55864
--- Comment #3 from beldmit at nm dot ru 2013-01-03 16:33:02 UTC ---
If this case is better to reproduce the problem or I completely do not
understand the asm usage?
The mmx registers and operations are used to speedup the 64-bit xor.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:33:29 UTC ---
Hmm, rejecting inlines late at ltrans stage really is problem as discussed
earlier - we make assumptions on the optimizations of constant parameters and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:35:46 UTC ---
Yes, I would have done it already but was taking a break from writing any code
over xmas!
This one needs a new export from the lib, but that's OK, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:37:00 UTC ---
Hmm, rejecting inlines late at ltrans stage really is problem as discussed
earlier - we make assumptions on the optimizations of constant parameters and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866
Bug #: 55866
Summary: [4.8 Regression] #include auto_ptr.h in C++11 mode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:40:48 UTC ---
We definitely should be able to make it work. We can simply inline
abort () ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 16:47:48
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 3 16:47:37 2013
New Revision: 194859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194859
Log:
2013-01-02 Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:51:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 3 16:51:41 2013
New Revision: 194860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194860
Log:
PR c++/53650
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] large |[4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:54:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
type(t), target :: x
class(*), pointer :: ptr2 = x
TODO: Check whether that would be also valid if x is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:54:07 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 3 16:53:54 2013
New Revision: 194861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194861
Log:
Fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:55:04 UTC ---
It's an error in the package and only worked by accident because
$PREFIX/include/c++/4.x.y/backward is in the include path, to allow strstream
to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-03
16:59:38 UTC ---
Eh, eh, indeed. Are you willing to take care of it over the next couple of
weeks? Otherwise let me know, I can, but not now, I'm trying to catch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
17:01:12 UTC ---
The header even says so, and has done so for years:
/** @file backward/auto_ptr.h
* This is an internal header file, included by other library
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55867
Bug #: 55867
Summary: Segmentation fault on DEALLOCATION of type with
ALLOCATABLE components
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55712
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 17:16:30 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Jan 3 17:16:08 2013
New Revision: 194862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194862
Log:
PR target/55712
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55868
Bug #: 55868
Summary: gfortran generates for CLASS(*) __m_MOD___vtab__$tar
on NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL systems
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55867
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854
--- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson damian at rouson dot net 2013-01-03
18:11:56 UTC ---
Apparently an ICE also occurs if the argument intent is removed but type is
replaced by class. See below. Is this fixed by the patch in comment 3?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
18:31:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 3 18:30:58 2013
New Revision: 194864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194864
Log:
PR c++/55856
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
18:31:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 3 18:31:23 2013
New Revision: 194865
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194865
Log:
PR c++/55856
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
18:34:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 3 18:34:48 2013
New Revision: 194866
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194866
Log:
PR c++/55856
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55847
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2013-01-03 19:03:25
UTC ---
I got
==23584== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x7f03d1089238 at pc 0xb9284a bp 0x7fffbd507b60 sp 0x7fffbd507b58
READ of size 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854
--- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson damian at rouson dot net 2013-01-03
19:12:09 UTC ---
Awesome -- thanks! Please let me know once this hits the trunk so I can
request an update of the macports build and try it out.
Damian
(In reply
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55059
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 19:29:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
So, where do we stand with this? Can GDB be changed to cope with this, or do
you think it isn't valid DWARF?
It seems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #6 from Toralf Förster toralf.foerster at gmx dot de 2013-01-03
19:35:16 UTC ---
As long as no fixed gcc version is released - in Gentoo land we do have this
work around for now :
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434908#c11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55842
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
