http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31178
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55586
--- Comment #3 from Aleksandr Platonov pam at oktetlabs dot ru 2013-02-11
08:00:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
As far as I can tell, it is a bug in earlier versions of GDB, and not in the
compiler.
a GDB that was 7.3 or newer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52516
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-02-11 08:39:42 UTC ---
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52516
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
08:40:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 29413
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29413
gcc56268.C
Tiny bit more reduced testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
08:45:31 UTC ---
Note a testcase should still be added to the testsuite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56238
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in |[4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56284
Bug #: 56284
Summary: ICE with contained routine which inappropriately
compares a string and a number
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
09:00:50 UTC ---
Thanks for working on this. I wonder why don't you store a struct
target_optabs *
filed directly into the optimization node, instead of using a hash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56284
--- Comment #1 from Arjen Markus arjen.markus at deltares dot nl 2013-02-11
09:01:29 UTC ---
Correcting the mistakes still causes an ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56282
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56274
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer aldot at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
09:32:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The problem is a missing VRP. Basically ivopts changes:
if (j_10 != 9)
Which works into:
j_10 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56284
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56282
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
09:53:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 29415
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29415
Instantiate and export new operator
Something like this, although
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56264
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
10:00:18 UTC ---
unswitching makes the formerly irreducible inner loop reducible on one
path (cfgcleanup makes this loop appear). As we are in the loop optimizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56282
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29415|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56283
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
10:05:58 UTC ---
You're looking at a post-C++11 draft, not at the standard. The change was made
by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3462.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56283
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56282
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56284
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] ICE with contained|[OOP] ICE with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56264
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
10:27:56 UTC ---
I would guess that originally cfg-cleanup caused basic-blocks to leak
outside a loop, thus at most exposing new use sites. With discovering
new
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56282
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-11 10:30:50 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Feb 11 10:30:43 2013
New Revision: 195939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195939
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-11 10:30:50 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Feb 11 10:30:43 2013
New Revision: 195939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195939
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56282
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56281
Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
10:52:39 UTC ---
One of the reasons this all happens is of course that after complete unrolling
we miss a pass that does full redundancy removal and const/copy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
11:36:29 UTC ---
So to re-cap, for vector intrinsics we can use the vector GCC extensions
while for the scalar intrinsics we would have to use target builtin folding.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-02-11
11:48:54 UTC ---
Indeed, thanks Jon.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56128
--- Comment #9 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
11:54:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Requires a merge as far as I can see. Important enough build issue.
I am reluctant to do another full merge so close to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56285
Bug #: 56285
Summary: [C++11] Arguments to an inheriting constructor is not
forwarded properly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56128
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
12:08:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
Requires a merge as far as I can see. Important enough build issue.
I am reluctant to do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56284
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56284
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56286
Bug #: 56286
Summary: vectorizer does not keep loop-closed SSA up-to-date
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56286
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56128
--- Comment #11 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
12:58:07 UTC ---
We need more than that. E.g. ppc64 asan is very much broken in the gcc tree,
that is fixed in upstream libasan already, right?
Last time I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56128
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
13:13:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
We need more than that. E.g. ppc64 asan is very much broken in the gcc
tree,
that is fixed in upstream libasan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56285
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
13:33:29 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 11 13:33:19 2013
New Revision: 195940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195940
Log:
2013-02-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56175
--- Comment #5 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2013-02-11
13:42:49 UTC ---
This pattern is already recognized by simplify_bitwise_binary but only for
usual int type, i.e. if we change all short types to the ordinary int (or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-11 13:47:21 UTC ---
The error can be reproduced on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with gas by
disabling weakref support, i.e. setting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56284
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11 13:57:36 UTC ---
The combined patches of comment 4 and 5 yield the following testsuite failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/altreturn_2.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56175
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
14:38:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
This pattern is already recognized by simplify_bitwise_binary but only for
usual int type, i.e. if we change all short
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
--- Comment #30 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
14:42:43 UTC ---
Could we on x86_64 think about mem_to_shadow(x) (x 3) + 0x7fff8000
Committed http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=174886view=rev
which adds an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56287
Bug #: 56287
Summary: __do_global_ctors_aux() crashing when LTO enabled with
flto-partition=none
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
15:02:25 UTC ---
If the mapping is so flexible, how can you detect mismatches? Different scale
or shadow offsets are ABI incompatible...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56264
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
15:07:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 11 15:07:40 2013
New Revision: 195941
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195941
Log:
2013-02-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
15:09:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 11 15:08:51 2013
New Revision: 195942
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195942
Log:
2013-02-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56264
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56263
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
15:09:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 29418
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29418
draft patch
PR target/56263
* config/avr/avr.opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56263
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56287
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56238
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56151
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
15:42:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 29419
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29419
gcc48-pr56151.patch
Untested patch, done in add_equal_note, so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
15:44:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
I don't understand why fully declared templates like Boost's shared_ptr have a
visibility at all.
I'm not sure why they
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
15:47:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 11 15:47:46 2013
New Revision: 195943
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195943
Log:
PR c++/56268
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56287
--- Comment #2 from Jan Keprt honyakeprt at centrum dot cz 2013-02-11
15:48:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Did the crt files somehow get LTO bytecode? That shouldn't happen. Please
show objdump -h of the used crtbegin.o/crtend.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56288
Bug #: 56288
Summary: always true conditional expression in verify_ssa_name
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56128
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
15:54:17 UTC ---
Perhaps instead of global vars defined outside of libasan (which e.g. requires
GOT accesses to those vars in libasan), it might be better to have the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56275
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11 16:05:51 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Feb 11 16:05:44 2013
New Revision: 195944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195944
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/56275
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56287
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56275
--- Comment #5 from klondike franxisco1988+gcc at gmail dot com 2013-02-11
16:10:49 UTC ---
Thanks Uros, for now I'll disable the code for gcc = 4.6.3 if SSE2 is not
available to prevent the crash on older distros.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56288
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
16:20:24 UTC ---
--- gcc/ipa-inline.c.jj2013-01-11 09:02:48.0 +0100
+++ gcc/ipa-inline.c2013-02-11 17:16:04.951958702 +0100
@@ -1792,7 +1792,7 @@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
16:21:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 11 16:21:10 2013
New Revision: 195945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195945
Log:
PR c++/56268
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56275
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11 17:27:39 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Feb 11 17:27:30 2013
New Revision: 195946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195946
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56275
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11 17:30:06 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Feb 11 17:29:53 2013
New Revision: 195947
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195947
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693
--- Comment #50 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-02-11
17:54:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #47)
Created attachment 29396 [details]
revised patch to revert r184293 while fixing PR55693
Bootstrap regtesting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56289
Bug #: 56289
Summary: Bad unused value warning with comma operator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56289
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
18:32:58 UTC ---
(void) x, y;
You are only casting x to void and not y.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56289
--- Comment #2 from Thomas thomaseding at gmail dot com 2013-02-11 18:35:29
UTC ---
But x was used inside the comma operator.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56289
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
18:40:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
But x was used inside the comma operator.
It is complaining about the right hand side which is y.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56171
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
19:03:09 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Feb 11 19:03:04 2013
New Revision: 195950
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195950
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56284
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-02-11
19:06:10 UTC ---
The combined patches of comment 4 and 5 yield the following testsuite
failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/altreturn_2.f90 -O (test for excess
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56171
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2013-02-11 19:16:41
UTC ---
The two closes of file descriptor 4 that you show are actually normal and
expected for this test. The first is the deferred close of the os.File that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56275
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56275
--- Comment #9 from klondike franxisco1988+gcc at gmail dot com 2013-02-11
19:25:15 UTC ---
Thanks again Uros, it's amazing how fast you have fixed this :D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56284
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11 19:46:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I don't know if it is the RIGHT fix, but at least it works (tested with
Yes, that's fine. Or one could just disable the errors with
! {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56290
Bug #: 56290
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE building OpenFOAM in in
ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #54 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
22:36:28 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 11 22:36:23 2013
New Revision: 195956
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195956
Log:
2013-02-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
22:55:44 UTC ---
Well, I think we should try to toamn fantasy of our optimizers here. What
unroller sees at -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize is quite ugly:
bb 2:
a = {};
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693
--- Comment #51 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
23:30:18 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 11 23:30:10 2013
New Revision: 195960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195960
Log:
/libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56291
Bug #: 56291
Summary: ICE for C++11 in output_constructor_regular_field, at
varasm.c:4821
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56290
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693
m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56290
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12
00:14:47 UTC ---
In gcc 4.7.2, reload resolved this with a pair of moves.
From the .197r.ira and 198r.reload dumps, with the asm_operands
split out and the insns
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo