http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56316
Bug #: 56316
Summary: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap with ada on mingw fails in
ada/gcc-interface/trans.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 08:22:33
UTC ---
For reference, some quotes from Honza:
-- PR54073--
The decision on whether to use cmov or jmp was always tricky on x86
architectures. Cmov increase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 08:27:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
-- PR53046 --
[...]
-- /PR53046 --
Actually, PR53346.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123
--- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14 08:45:16
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Feb 14 08:45:09 2013
New Revision: 196046
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196046
Log:
2013-02-14 Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56316
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de 2013-02-14
08:52:19 UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 14.02.2013 09:46, schrieb charlet at gcc dot gnu.org:
I would suggest always checking with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-02-14 08:56:12 UTC ---
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #14 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56316
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14 09:11:06 UTC ---
New version of the patch, the previous one did PATTERN (PATTERN ()). I'm
bootstrapping this now on x86_64, and will test it on mips.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
09:18:46 UTC ---
Because as it is seen as a regular VAR_DECL by optimizers the
vectorizer (well, IPA increase-alignment in this case) chooses to
bump its
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56317
Bug #: 56317
Summary: inheriting constructor fails to move brace-initialized
object
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56317
--- Comment #1 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com 2013-02-14 09:35:12
UTC ---
(But, perfect forwarding equivalent to the inheriting constructor semantic does
work around the issue.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56138
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
09:37:58 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Feb 14 09:37:53 2013
New Revision: 196047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196047
Log:
2013-02-14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56317
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56285
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||potswa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56138
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56171
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14 10:11:11 UTC
---
Created attachment 29448
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29448
proposed patch for __xnet_ socket functions
This works fine in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56204
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-14 10:13:03 UTC ---
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13
12:06:02 UTC ---
Thanks for testing. It looks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318
Bug #: 56318
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result with MATMUL of
PARAMETER
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56314
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-02-14 10:41:07 UTC ---
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #17 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311
--- Comment #2 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-14 10:44:25 UTC ---
P.S: I am willing to debug this further on my own, but I need some help.
My first guess is that the files in include-fixed are system headers, which are
somehow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-02-14 11:05:32
UTC ---
See fixincludes/inclhack.def, it looks like this is from hackname =
hpux10_stdio_declarations, and select = ^#[ \t]*define _iob[ \t]*__iob needs
to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
szarpaj at grubelek dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||szarpaj at grubelek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56175
--- Comment #11 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2013-02-14
12:03:37 UTC ---
I did measurements of 3 possible fixes:
1. Comment out 2 patterns related to type sinking.
2. Comment out 1st pattern only.
3. Prohibit type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56319
Bug #: 56319
Summary: call to implicitly-deleted copy constructor accepted
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
12:24:26 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 14 12:24:12 2013
New Revision: 196050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196050
Log:
2013-02-14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56320
Bug #: 56320
Summary: Several libgo tests FAIL on 64-bit Solaris/x86
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56319
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56319
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
12:36:56 UTC ---
Reduced to remove tuple dependency
templatetypename T
struct tuple
{
T t;
};
templateclass... Types
tupleTypes...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56319
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14 13:04:15
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Feb 14 13:04:10 2013
New Revision: 196051
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196051
Log:
2013-02-14 Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
Bug #: 56321
Summary: ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations
-O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-14 13:56:13 UTC ---
Patch fixes ICE on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. Testsuite running...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
13:58:06 UTC ---
Better backtrace:
X.c: In function ‘foo’:
X.c:1:7: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
float foo(int n)
^
0xa40775 crash_signal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
14:06:36 UTC ---
And yeah, with -fno-tree-reassoc - no ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56322
Bug #: 56322
Summary: text/template and testing/quick FAIL on 32-bit
Solaris/SPARC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56324
Bug #: 56324
Summary: exp/locale/collate/build FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/SPARC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56323
Bug #: 56323
Summary: [C++11] cannot compile inherited constructor for
typedef'ed base class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56323
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
14:43:29 UTC ---
Actually I might be wrong about that, now that I think about it -- probably
this was done in 4.8. It seems longer ago than that. ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #8 from arturomdn at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 15:53:15 UTC ---
It is possible (just a guess) that the extra compare is causing an interlock in
the processor since the first cmov is issued speculatively and the condition
won't be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56326
Bug #: 56326
Summary: g++.dg/gomp/tls-wrap4.C and
g++.dg/tls/thread_local-wrap4.C FAIL on Solaris 9/x86
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56326
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14 15:55:42 UTC
---
Created attachment 29450
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29450
tls-wrap4.s assembler output with as (emutls)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56326
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14 15:56:30 UTC
---
Created attachment 29451
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29451
tls-wrap4.s assembler output with gas (native tls)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #9 from arturomdn at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 16:00:49 UTC ---
I found in the Intel optimization guide an example of this idiom of comparing
once and issuing two cmov back-to-back... so the problem isn't the two cmov,
but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56327
Bug #: 56327
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Revision 196009 breaks bootstrap on
x32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328
Bug #: 56328
Summary: Explicit instantiation of inline function template
works for base template, fails for specialized
template
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56323
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #10 from arturomdn at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 16:43:23 UTC ---
Might be worth mentioning here what I said in the stackoverflow answer, that in
this particular case the entire conditional branch can be avoided because it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56327
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
16:54:07 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Feb 14 16:54:01 2013
New Revision: 196054
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196054
Log:
OFF_T:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
17:10:02 UTC ---
A bit more clear with insn 195 added:
195: flags:CC=cmp(r124:DI,r235:DI)
197: r116:DI={(gtu(flags:CC,0))?r125:DI:r233:DI}
199:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #14 from arturomdn at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 17:30:54 UTC ---
I also did the experiment, with the same results... it got faster but not as
fast as the version with
conditional branch instead of conditional moves:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #15 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 17:34:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.7.2 ...
$ g++ -O3 -std=c++11 by-val-O3.ii ; ./a.out
Took 14.31 seconds total.
$ g++ -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #16 from arturomdn at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 17:42:55 UTC ---
With -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-loop-if-convert flags it generated this for the
loop in question:
.L39:
movq%rdi, %rdx
addq
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #17 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 17:49:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
And it executed fast:
./by-val-O3-flags
Took 6.74 seconds total.
The solution to all these PRs is trivial: kill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #7 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2013-02-14 18:00:57 UTC
---
Sorry, but wouldn't that be papering over bugs? I'm confounded by the
attitude around bootstrap failures, regardless of the basic supported options
being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #18 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 18:23:12
UTC ---
Following patch is a big hammer approach to the problem, intended only for
benchmarking
--cut here--
Index: common/config/i386/i386-common.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
18:44:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Why does the compiler treat a specialized template differently from the base
template when it comes to explicit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2013-02-14 18:47:12
UTC ---
-O3 and -fprofile-use turn on optimizations like -funroll-loops which
trigger false positive warnings.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56329
Bug #: 56329
Summary: Segmentation fault on simple invalid code with
variadic template specialisation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
--- Comment #14 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-02-14
19:06:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 29453
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29453
C++ source code
Old version understood about a dozen formats,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311
--- Comment #4 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-14 19:45:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 29454
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29454
gcc-4.7.2-inclhack-hpux10_stdio_declarations.patch
Attached patch fixes the issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
20:11:32 UTC ---
Odd. Reassociation makes a correct and profitable transformation into
foo (int n)
{
double _2;
double _5;
double _6;
double _7;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56319
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
20:39:53 UTC ---
The foo2 specialization is not declared in main.cpp before it would be
needed, so the program is ill-formed, no diagnostic required, according to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55941
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
20:45:35 UTC ---
Also, [basic.def.odr]: An inline function shall be defined in every
translation unit in which it is odr-used. and [dcl.fct.spec] If a function
with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56319
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++11] Rvalue-reference|[DR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56329
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #11 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2013-02-14 21:27:54 UTC
---
Attached is an updated version of the tests Maxim committed to the google/4_7
branch. The only difference is that more of the tests are xfail'd than in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55477
--- Comment #7 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2013-02-14 21:28:33 UTC
---
Created attachment 29455
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29455
diff against trunk adding new testcases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56330
Bug #: 56330
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: gimple_bb
(stmt) is set to a wrong basic block with
-fsanitize=address
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56330
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56214
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56267
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56224
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
22:13:38 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Feb 14 22:13:26 2013
New Revision: 196058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196058
Log:
2013-02-14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56331
Bug #: 56331
Summary: Gnatprep returns zero on error.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #20 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14
22:17:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
--- by-val-O3.s.orig2013-02-14 18:06:56.0 +0100
+++ by-val-O3.s 2013-02-14 18:07:23.0 +0100
@@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56330
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8 Regression] ICE: |ICE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
