http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50304
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56470
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
--- Comment #6 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
2013-03-04 08:34:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
int first;
void thread_backedge (void)
{
int i = 0;
do
{
if (first ==1)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56509
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56509
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
09:08:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 29577
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29577
gcc48-pr56509.patch
Would it help to just move opts_obstack and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56315
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56510
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
09:21:38 UTC ---
That reduced testcase actually compiles in a few seconds on a fast box, so
let's make it larger, then it will take a few years:
struct S { unsigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-04
09:45:14 UTC ---
Sorry, I didn't notice that in 54383 we aren't in a class.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56516
Bug #: 56516
Summary: problem parsing templates: object.field 10
interpreted as ill formed template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56494
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
09:53:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
This happens because 0 - 1 overflows in sizetype:
#6 0x00ac3e3d in size_binop_loc (loc=0, code=MINUS_EXPR,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-03-04 09:57:40 UTC ---
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, aldyh at redhat dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #12 from Aldy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
10:02:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 4 10:02:26 2013
New Revision: 196424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196424
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
10:06:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 4 10:06:22 2013
New Revision: 196425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196425
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
10:08:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 4 10:08:01 2013
New Revision: 196426
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196426
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56516
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
10:09:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 4 10:08:57 2013
New Revision: 196427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196427
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56494
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56517
Bug #: 56517
Summary: ICE: in find_valid_class, at reload.c:704
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56517
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54043
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56501
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56494
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56504
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56505
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54043
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56510
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
10:52:35 UTC ---
Why TER into debug-insns at all?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54043
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-03-04 10:46:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Then I suppose that if anything this is library, not core, even if there are
interactions. Is there an open LWG DR?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56504
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
10:53:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Unfortunately, no further documentation is available, telling whether, e.g.,
src and dst may be the same or not.
AMD told
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56510
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
10:56:14 UTC ---
Because TERed stmts won't be expanded, so there is nothing to refer to.
Furthermore, in many cases expand_debug_expr relies on seeing the inner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56514
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56515
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56518
Bug #: 56518
Summary: Segmentation fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56518
--- Comment #1 from Elisey Zanko elisey.zanko at gmail dot com 2013-03-04
11:10:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 29579
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29579
A preprocessed file causing bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56519
Bug #: 56519
Summary: DO CONCURRENT: wrongly accepts calls to impure
intrinsics
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
11:12:42 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Mar 4 11:12:30 2013
New Revision: 196428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196428
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
11:12:42 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Mar 4 11:12:30 2013
New Revision: 196428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196428
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56519
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56518
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
11:29:16 UTC ---
What will the result be used for in this case? The result, usizetype_max,
is certainly not 0 - 1 == -1 as it is unsigned.
It's used for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56515
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56518
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
13:13:58 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef struct {
float l, h;
} tFPinterval;
tFPinterval X[1024];
tFPinterval Y[1024];
tFPinterval Z[1024];
void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56513
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-03-04
13:24:04 UTC ---
The wrong-code with -O3 -fno-tree-coalesce-vars stopped occurring at r190284,
Richard Biener's large Allow anonymous SSA names patch. The patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
Bug #: 56520
Summary: Syntax error causes misleading message: Invalid
character in name
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49828
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
14:19:37 UTC ---
We don't properly vectorize the 2nd reference to the load (this time
unpermuted). When vectorizing the 2nd SLP instance with that reference
we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56521
Bug #: 56521
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Uninitialized value_id
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-03-04 15:12:25 UTC ---
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #7 from Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56495
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
15:38:53 UTC ---
Hm, if hb lb - what kind of pair do you expect? The only case
where lb - 1 is the upper bound (whatever upper bound is for an
empty array ...)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522
Bug #: 56522
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 9% / 11% slower
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56521
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-03-04 15:45:09 UTC ---
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #9 from Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56523
Bug #: 56523
Summary: -Wunitialized is described to be enabled -Wall
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56515
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2013-03-04 16:06:25 UTC
---
We build the function decls via build_fn_decl which ends up using
input_location of the first random function we are processing.
But that doesn't seem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
16:10:53 UTC ---
How can the patch cause a name collision when all the patch does is
avoid creating a new decl...? They are static and thus should be
mangled.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56523
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-04
16:16:16 UTC ---
On which basis do you think it doesn't? In practice, for a stupid example like
the below, with -Wall:
int main()
{
int a;
return a;
}
I get:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
16:18:21 UTC ---
So, can the Ada FE be changed to use that? Hacks like this belong with a
comment in the FE that needs them IMHO.
The 2 other related hacks are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56403
--- Comment #9 from Adam Seering aseering at vertica dot com 2013-03-04
16:43:07 UTC ---
Thanks!
I'm curious if the fix is likely to get backported?
Also, is there a straightforward workaround? Would you expect it to trigger
with all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56506
--- Comment #3 from Michael Mehlich mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot com
2013-03-04 16:58:45 UTC ---
Considering that based on 14.5.3(5) a template member declaration
XYZT...,T...::type x;
with T bound to int,bool,char must expand to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56403
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
17:02:23 UTC ---
The fix seems extremely safe, so I think backporting to 4.6 and 4.7 makes
sense.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
17:12:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 4 17:12:32 2013
New Revision: 196437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196437
Log:
PR c++/56464
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
17:12:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 4 17:12:32 2013
New Revision: 196437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196437
Log:
PR c++/56464
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
17:15:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
A guess is that you end up creating SSA names during code transform in
different
order - which can result from walking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524
Bug #: 56524
Summary: Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56523
--- Comment #2 from corentinjabot at gmail dot com 2013-03-04 17:33:26 UTC ---
Actually after a few more test it works correctly but the statement This
enables some extra warning flags that are not enabled by -Wall. is confusing
since the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56424
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
17:41:41 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Mar 4 17:41:32 2013
New Revision: 196439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196439
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56523
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56424
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56525
Bug #: 56525
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Access to ggc_freed memory in
flow_loops_find
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54995
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56447
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||temtaime
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55828
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526
Bug #: 56526
Summary: [4.8 regression] false positive for
maybe-uninitialized
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2013-03-04 19:04:58 UTC
---
Created attachment 29580
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29580
save-temps output from same commandline/path
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56509
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-03-04 19:50:07
UTC ---
This is working.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56511
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56527
Bug #: 56527
Summary: Provide an import counterpart to
attribute((visibility(protected)))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56486
Dara Hazeghi dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56494
--- Comment #4 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com rdsandiford at
googlemail dot com 2013-03-04 21:06:10 UTC ---
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes:
Created attachment 29578
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55295
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04 21:50:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
+1
I'm seeing the same pattern.
Infact, I'm noticing a lot of my maths code seems to be performing a lot of
redundant
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04
21:52:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 4 21:52:08 2013
New Revision: 196445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196445
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56528
Bug #: 56528
Summary: __attribute__((visibility)) ignored for a function
declaration with an asm label
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56529
Bug #: 56529
Summary: [SH] Calls to __sdivsi3_i4i and __udivsi3_i4i are
generated on SH2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56529
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-04 23:44:09
UTC ---
Created attachment 29581
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29581
A possible patch
This patch seems to fix the problem, although
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56527
--- Comment #1 from Andy Lutomirski luto at mit dot edu 2013-03-05 00:37:20
UTC ---
In fact, without an improvement like this, protected visibility is unusable on
objects -- anything linking against a protected object will generate a copy
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
