http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56960
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56961
Bug #: 56961
Summary: cycle between do_spec_1() / process_brace_body() /
handle_braces()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56961
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: cycle between
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56961
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56897
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56961
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2013-04-15
08:01:24 UTC ---
gcc-4.7.2 / Fedora 18 FAIL too
gcc version 4.7.2 20121109 (Red Hat 4.7.2-8) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56962
Bug #: 56962
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] SLSR caused miscompilation of
fftw
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56962
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56963
Bug #: 56963
Summary: GCC 4.8.0 LTO issue: lto1: internal compiler error: in
add_symbol_to_partition, at lto/lto-partition.c:284
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
08:35:50 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 15 08:28:41 2013
New Revision: 197958
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197958root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
08:36:16 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 15 08:31:12 2013
New Revision: 197959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197959root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
08:36:36 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 15 08:33:56 2013
New Revision: 197960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197960root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56963
Václav Zeman vhaisman at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56963
--- Comment #2 from Václav Zeman vhaisman at gmail dot com 2013-04-15
08:39:40 UTC ---
None of the tricks (-fno-reorder-blocks, -r, -nostdlib) help here. It still
fails the same way.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #41 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-04-15 09:27:09 UTC ---
I'm currently running a bootstrap of gcc 4.7.3 with this patch applied
and without any special
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478
Aron Ahmadia aron at ahmadia dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aron at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56962
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
10:19:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
I think it is talking about the memory returned by malloc/calloc will not
point
to another
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56952
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54078
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56947
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56944
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56935
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56964
Bug #: 56964
Summary: ICE with -fno-sync-libcalls when target lacks atomic
operations
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
11:18:43 UTC ---
/* { dg-do run } */
extern void abort (void);
void __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
foo (double *b, double *d, double *f)
{
int i;
for (i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56965
Bug #: 56965
Summary: nonoverlapping_component_refs_p is bogus
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #40 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-04-15 12:51:20 UTC ---
--- Comment #39 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12
16:13:20 UTC ---
Can this be reproduced with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
12:57:51 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Apr 15 12:43:15 2013
New Revision: 197968
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197968root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR 56919 Improve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56816
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56962
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
13:19:53 UTC ---
The fix looks correct to me. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56966
Bug #: 56966
Summary: [4.7 Regression] wrong warning with -Werror (wrong
code without Werror?)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56967
Bug #: 56967
Summary: Add build exception
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56967
--- Comment #1 from Yoshinori Sato ysato at users dot sourceforge.jp
2013-04-15 13:39:23 UTC ---
Add exceptions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56968
Bug #: 56968
Summary: Issue with a procedure defined with a generic name
returning procedure pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56969
Bug #: 56969
Summary: ISO_C_BINDING regression with current trunk
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56970
Bug #: 56970
Summary: SFINAE does not apply correctly to sizeof.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56935
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56969
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56968
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56921
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
14:46:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 29877
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29877
patch papering over the issue with TODO_do_not_ggc_collect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #4 from Dan Gohman sunfish at google dot com 2013-04-15 14:53:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Well, it _is_ actually about the content. There must be no way to compute
a valid pointer to another object from the contents
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56969
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56935
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2013-04-15
14:54:50 UTC ---
Richard,
both subq's are accessed the same cash line and it means that after 1st store
tthe 2nd load will stall till finish updating data cash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56962
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56968
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-04-15
15:02:48 UTC ---
For the record, gfortran 4.4.6 compiles the test, but not 4.5.3, 4.6.4, 4.7.3,
4.8.0, and trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56970
Fan Yu yufanyufan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56921
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15 15:26:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Created attachment 29877 [details]
patch papering over the issue with TODO_do_not_ggc_collect
Patch papering over (restoring
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56890
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Jung rainer.jung at kippdata dot de 2013-04-15
15:34:42 UTC ---
I tried the sparc.c patch on top of GCC 4.7.3 and it works.
Thanks for fixing :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56971
Bug #: 56971
Summary: GCC claims a friend function to be overloaded, but it
isn't
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56971
--- Comment #1 from henn...@still-hidden.de 2013-04-15 16:19:21 UTC ---
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56972
Bug #: 56972
Summary: Missing may be used uninitialized warning for
obvious uninitialized
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56972
Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56970
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56968
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[F03] Issue with a |[4.7/4.8/4.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56968
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15 17:16:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Regtesting now ...
Completed successfully. Will commit to trunk as obvious ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56966
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
17:34:20 UTC ---
I don't think this is wrong code at all. The warning is correct for the code
as given but wrong for memset in general.
The code looks like:
void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56968
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56605
Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56973
Bug #: 56973
Summary: crash when capturing variables in nested lambdas
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56968
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15 18:35:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #1)
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56972
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56921
--- Comment #13 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15
19:37:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #11)
Created attachment 29877 [details]
patch papering over the issue with TODO_do_not_ggc_collect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
Bug #: 56974
Summary: c++ ref qualifiers not represented in DWARF
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55414
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51432
--- Comment #5 from Tomohiro Kashiwada kikairoya at gmail dot com 2013-04-16
03:33:22 UTC ---
no problem at gcc-4.7.3. it works fine.
$ rx-elf-g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=rx-elf-g++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56897
--- Comment #4 from Martynas Venckus martynas at venck dot us 2013-04-16
04:11:52 UTC ---
Hi,
(In reply to comment #3)
Please create a self-sufficient executable testcase, following the
instructions
at [1]. I was not able to confirm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56897
--- Comment #5 from Martynas Venckus martynas at venck dot us 2013-04-16
04:16:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 29878
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29878
ab-pre.tgz
gcc a.c; ./a.out
0d0a
0d0a0401
0d0a0401
gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56897
--- Comment #6 from Martynas Venckus martynas at venck dot us 2013-04-16
04:18:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 29879
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29879
ab-post.tgz
gcc a.c; ./a.out
0d0a
0d0a0401
0d0a0401
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56934
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51432
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
76 matches
Mail list logo