[Bug fortran/56806] make: *** [spher_harm.o] Error 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56806 Bud Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/57416] internal compiler error: in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:4575

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57416 --- Comment #6 from Frank Bergemann --- the error depends on optimization level. -O0 has the problem -O1, -02, -03 do not have the problem. For those i get - even for the original buggy code: make all Building file: ../main.cpp Invoking: GCC C++

[Bug c++/57388] [C++11] ICE when function types with ref-qualifiers meet other function types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57388 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/57418] New: Another verify_ssa failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57418 Bug ID: 57418 Summary: Another verify_ssa failure Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: u

[Bug rtl-optimization/57417] New: hang on volatile int array

gcc version 4.9.0 20130525 (experimental) [trunk revision 199323] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -m32 -O0 -c small.c $ gcc-trunk -m32 -O1 -c small.c ^C $ cat small.c int a, b, c; void foo () { volatile int d[1]; b = 0; for (;; a--) c = (int)&d[b]; }

[Bug c++/57416] internal compiler error: in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:4575

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57416 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #4) We had a clash here, but except for my first observation the remaining questions are still relevant.

[Bug c++/57416] internal compiler error: in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:4575

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57416 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler --- If you remove the still existing member initializer in func1, does the ICE still exist? (On 4.9 after removal of that initializer I could compile and run the program). Are all the compiler flags necessary to

[Bug c++/57416] internal compiler error: in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:4575

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57416 Frank Bergemann changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30194|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Maybe it was original DATA_ALIGNMENT purpose, but it certainly serves for both right now, which is wrong, we need one for ABI mandated stuff and one for optimization stuff beyond, where optimization alignment

[Bug c++/57416] internal compiler error: in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:4575

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57416 --- Comment #2 from Frank Bergemann --- Created attachment 30194 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30194&action=edit fixed version of test program - compilation works now Hi Daniel, thanks for the hint! - i was not aware of thi

[Bug c++/57416] internal compiler error: in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:4575

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57416 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 Sandra Loosemore changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at codesourcery dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/57416] New: internal compiler error: in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:4575

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57416 Bug ID: 57416 Summary: internal compiler error: in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:4575 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/53916] [mips16] divide operation compiled result incorrect with GCC-4.6.3 '-O2' option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53916 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/55777] Inlining nomips16 function into mips16 function can result in undefined builtins

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55777 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/52768] cannot resolve address of function template with empty template argument list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52768 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/57415] [4.9 Regression] New PPC testsuite failure C++ compound literarl expr unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57415 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-*-* Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/57415] New: [4.9 Regression] New PPC testsuite failure C++ compound literarl expr unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57415 Bug ID: 57415 Summary: [4.9 Regression] New PPC testsuite failure C++ compound literarl expr unimplemented Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/57408] lambda, Variable length arrays, thread, internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9327

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57408 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler --- Further simplification down to a library-free test case: //-- template struct Impl { Callable func; Impl(Callable f) : func(f) { } virtual

[Bug c++/57408] lambda, Variable length arrays, thread, internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9327

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57408 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug c++/57414] Internal Compiler error when using std::mutex

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57414 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|r...@ramses-p

[Bug c++/57414] New: Internal Compiler error when using std::mutex

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57414 Bug ID: 57414 Summary: Internal Compiler error when using std::mutex Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/52216] [C++11] Wrong exception deduction for some forms of placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52216 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/52216] [C++11] Wrong exception deduction for some forms of placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52216 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #5) It would be great to have these test cases added.

[Bug c++/52216] [C++11] Wrong exception deduction for some forms of placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52216 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- Of course, for sure we do have now bad_array_new_length, many commits by Jason and others in this area. Let me double check, I'm thinking adding the testcase maybe, and closing the issue. Thanks again!

[Bug c++/52216] [C++11] Wrong exception deduction for some forms of placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52216 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #3) It seems that this is CWG 1465 and it will be resolved by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1351 It seems that this bug entry is fixed

[Bug c++/57388] [C++11] ICE when function types with ref-qualifiers meet other function types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57388 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- I see Daniel. Jason is already on it.

[Bug c++/57388] [C++11] ICE when function types with ref-qualifiers meet other function types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57388 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler --- Extending std::is_function in regard to ref-qualified functions will depend on that issue. I haven't found a way to get around these ICEs in the (updated) test cases.

[Bug c++/47765] [Core/1391] Wrong template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wrong template deduction|[Core/1391] Wrong template

[Bug c++/52216] [C++11] Wrong exception deduction for some forms of placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52216 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[C++11][noexcept] Wrong |[C++11] Wrong exception

[Bug c++/52377] C++11 non-static initializers in unions are not used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52377 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c/57409] implement PIE support or reject -pie option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57409 --- Comment #7 from Christian Jullien --- Thanks for your time on this issue Eric. My preference goes to PIE failure detection when gcc is bootstrapped and gcc complains when -pie is set on an unsupported platform. You can do whatever you want w

[Bug c++/52427] [C++11] problem with defaulted copy constructor and -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52427 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c/57409] implement PIE support or reject -pie option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57409 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|implement PIE support on|implement PIE support or

[Bug middle-end/57366] gcc.dg/lto/attr-weakref-1 FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57366 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I see the same failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10. With the patch in comment #9, I still get FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/attr-weakref-1 c_lto_attr-weakref-1_0.o-c_lto_attr-weakref-1_2.o link, -O0 -flto -flto-part

[Bug libgcc/57405] Using printf in signal handler with alternate stack generates a SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57405 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment #

[Bug testsuite/57413] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/discriminator.c scan-assembler on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57413 Bug ID: 57413 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/discriminator.c scan-assembler on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/47765] Wrong template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #7) > Do we have a DR # for this issue? It seems to me that this is http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1391 submitted by Jason with a simpli

[Bug target/12081] Gcc can't be compiled with -mregparm=3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081 --- Comment #21 from Mikael Pettersson --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #20) > Grepping around I also > noticed that nothing used GEN_FCN11 (or is that used by the out-of-tree > OpenRISC port?) This add-on fixes those two issues.

[Bug lto/51432] [4.6 regression] ICE in -flto -std=c++0x -g with cross-compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51432 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||philb at gnu dot org --- Comment #7 from

[Bug c++/49433] internal compiler error: in write_builtin_type, at cp/mangle.c:2167

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49433 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/57334] ICE: in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:287

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57334 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I've seen this ICE before I think. > > else if (code == GIMPLE_LABEL) > gcc_assert (emit_label_in_global_context_p (gimple_label_label (stmt)) >

[Bug target/55777] Inlining nomips16 function into mips16 function can result in undefined builtins

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55777 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c/57409] implement PIE support on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57409 --- Comment #5 from Christian Jullien --- Thanks, now all is clear to me. I see different possible solutions: 1) gcc toolchain detects that it is using a linker that does not support pie and issue a error "unsupported flag" when we try to use pi

[Bug c++/47765] Wrong template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini --- Do we have a DR # for this issue?

[Bug c++/57408] lambda, Variable length arrays, thread, internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9327

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57408 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- I'm not at all sure this is a C++ front-end issue.

[Bug target/55876] internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:776

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55876 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/25666] Bad diagnostic for templated destructor as friend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25666 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/57412] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1647: loop 1's latch does not have an edge to its header with -fopenmp -fipa-pure-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57412 Bug ID: 57412 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1647: loop 1's latch does not have an edge to its header with -fopenmp -fipa-pure-const Pr

[Bug c/57409] implement PIE support on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57409 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|PIE doesn't work with GNU |implement PIE support on

[Bug target/55876] internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:776

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55876 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/57411] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 11 with -fno-tree-dce -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57411 Bug ID: 57411 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 4 does not dominate use in block 11 with -fno-tree-dce -ftree-vectorize Product: gcc

[Bug lto/57334] ICE: in input_gimple_stmt, at gimple-streamer-in.c:287

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57334 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- gcc-4.8: PASS: 196672 (pre-4.8.0) 199240 gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 20130523 (prerelease) gcc-4.9: PASS 198354 FAIL 199000, 199239 simlified testcase $ cat a.i void foo () { } void bar () { return; // trigge

[Bug target/56021] HAVE_STBLIB_H and HAVE_LIMITS_H not defined. Can't build gcc 3.2.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56021 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/57118] g++.dg/debug/* tests fail on MIPS due to micromips checkin, scan-assembler pattern needs update

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57118 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/12081] Gcc can't be compiled with -mregparm=3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #20

[Bug c/57409] PIE doesn't work with GNU binutils on SPARC/Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57409 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57410] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in emit_spill_move, at lra-constraints.c:863 with -fpeel-loops and uninitialised variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410 Bug ID: 57410 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in emit_spill_move, at lra-constraints.c:863 with -fpeel-loops and uninitialised variable Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug c/57409] PIE (-fPIE -pie) prevents any malloc on Solaris 10 sparc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57409 --- Comment #2 from Christian Jullien --- Thanks for your quick reply yet it is not totally satisfactory. 1) if gcc does not support pie on solaris 10 sparc (I can accept that), gcc toolchain should detect this and protest (from ./configure) if P