http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57364
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Jun 4 07:11:12 2013
New Revision: 199635
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199635root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-06-04 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57364
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
No, rather different issues.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57522
Bug ID: 57522
Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct creates array descriptor
with incorrect stride for derived type array component
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also fails on Solaris 9 with Sun as, will check if current mainline works
again.
Both
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8/4.9 regression]|[4.8 regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57522
--- Comment #1 from Alan Briolat alan.briolat at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 30255
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30255action=edit
Working equivalent code based on pointers
For comparison, this attached code uses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57523
Bug ID: 57523
Summary: ICE in merge_assigned_reloads, at reload1.c:6062
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #23 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Jun 4 10:20:32 2013
New Revision: 199643
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199643root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-06-03 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #24 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch in comment 23 adds finalization support for allocatables (end of
scope, intent(out), DEALLOCATE, MOVE_ALLOC).
Thus, on the trunk (GCC 4.9), finalization is now finally
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #38 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
No longer a 4.9 regression, fixed by the patch for PR middle-end/57366.
Good news.
Unfortunately, that doesn't easily backport to the 4.8 branch since that lacks
alias and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #39 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #36 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am having problem to reproduce it on a cross compiler. I assume you have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57521
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
Bug ID: 57524
Summary: internal compiler error on dump translation unit
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484
--- Comment #8 from Charles L. Wilcox zxClhzAApX1EdJwQANqrjLERmFeURQVy at cynd
dot net ---
FWIW, I tried this with g++ 4.8 on a 32-bit only system I have; it still
produces erroneous sNaN values there:
$ g++-4.8 -v
Using built-in specs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57525
Bug ID: 57525
Summary: cc1.exe: fatal error: help-dummy: No such file or
directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524
--- Comment #1 from James Michael DuPont JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot
com ---
I tried to reduce the input size but it is not producing any results.
namespace std {
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
};
namespace boost {
namespace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57482
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|AVR ATmega128 |avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #40 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #38 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Unfortunately, that doesn't easily backport to the 4.8 branch since that
lacks
alias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780
Pedro Alves palves at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palves at redhat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57358
--- Comment #1 from Nickolay Kolchin-Semyonov nbkolchin at gmail dot com ---
Reproducable with gcc-4.8.1.
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-4.8.1
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.1/lto-wrapper
Target:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
thutt at vmware dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57358
--- Comment #2 from Nickolay Kolchin-Semyonov nbkolchin at gmail dot com ---
More simplified test variant:
struct t { void (*func)(void*); };
void test_func(struct t* a) __attribute__((optimize(O0)));
void test_func(struct t* a)
{
a-func(0);
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57526
Bug ID: 57526
Summary: use of X before deduction of auto error for seemingly
good code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57527
Bug ID: 57527
Summary: [C++11] Nested variadic templates cause internal
compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57527
--- Comment #1 from markus.mayr at outlook dot com ---
Created attachment 30257
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30257action=edit
Source code example.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57526
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57506
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30258
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30258action=edit
Patch against avr-mcus.def
Notice that some sources depend on the patch, e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57527
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #41 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
I however do not see any chained weakrefs in the preprocessed file
attached, so
I am not quite convinced this can change anything.
Can you, please, run it in debugger and take a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57528
Bug ID: 57528
Summary: Missed warning for putting reference to temporary in
class member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57529
Bug ID: 57529
Summary: Redundant masking of zero-extended values
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57530
Bug ID: 57530
Summary: [OOP] Wrongly rejects type_pointer = class_target
(which have identical declared type)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780
--- Comment #6 from Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) yselkowitz at users dot
sourceforge.net ---
Not only that, but even with --enable-install-libiberty, it's not being
installed in CVS HEAD. Don't you need to remove the resetting of
target_header_dir in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55776
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57527
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57268
dinar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
Bug ID: 57531
Summary: lvalue required with comma operator
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
vijay Nag vijunag at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57531
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55776
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51908
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57528
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55776
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
But the global foo is a type while myenum::foo is not a type. Is there any
context where they can be used interchangeably?
enum
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
--- Comment #9 from thutt at vmware dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
Since glibc controls the headers we (GCC) project cannot do anything.
???
From your standpoint of having cpp produce different output, I understand
your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55776
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A better example:
typedef unsigned char foo;
enum class myenum
{
foo,
bar = (foo)-1
};
Is the value -1L or 255?
If I rename myenum::foo to myenum::Foo the code silently
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55776
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It also changes meaning if I reorder the declarations of myenum::foo and
myenum::bar, which is exactly the sort of fragile code that deserves a warning.
53 matches
Mail list logo