[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 11 06:03:46 2013 New Revision: 199934 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199934root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/56564 * varasm.c

[Bug libstdc++/57421] Error when linking static libstc++ due to missing future classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57421 --- Comment #10 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- After I completely recompiled the trunk version (r199585) the problem is gone. So most probably it resulted from an incomplete update and recompilation of the code, or was in an

[Bug middle-end/54582] gap in FORTIFY checking of buffer lengths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582 --- Comment #16 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Created attachment 30287 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30287action=edit C++ source code Latest version understands NUM1.NUM2, 53 formatting specifiers and a

[Bug target/56739] FreeBSD ia64: gcc49/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd10.0/libstdc++-v3/include/mutex:781:41: internl compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56739 Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Good to be assigned. I posted the patch Jason, can you please look at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00433.html Honza

[Bug target/57578] SPE detection broken on Linux (bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57578 Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot

[Bug target/57578] SPE detection broken on Linux (bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57578 Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/57579] Problem with vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57579 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/57582] New: clone is effectively reserved by iostream and should not be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57582 Bug ID: 57582 Summary: clone is effectively reserved by iostream and should not be Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/57579] Problem with vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57579 --- Comment #3 from Federico Carminati federico.carminati at cern dot ch --- Hello Richard, thanks a lot!! I would have never figured this out by myself. However let me repeat my question, is there a place where this can be learnt without

[Bug libstdc++/57582] clone is effectively reserved by iostream and should not be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57582 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nmm1 at

[Bug libstdc++/57049] std::swap does self move assignment, which is illegal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57049 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/56677] [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results doesnt verify as __is_ratio

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/56430] In __airy: return-statement with a value, in function returning 'void'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- What happened to this issue?

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10.8 at revision 199935, I get the following failures for the tests added at revision 199898: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr56564-1.c scan-tree-dump-times

[Bug libstdc++/56019] max_align_t should be in std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56019 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #16) On x86_64-apple-darwin10.8 at revision 199935, I get the following failures for the tests added at revision 199898: FAIL:

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #17 from Nick Maclaren nmm1 at cam dot ac.uk --- I will just add to comment 8 that dumping large chunks of the POSIX namespace in isn't legal, unless WG21 have completely lost their marbles :-) But, as people have said, this isn't

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment 8 is only referring to cstdio et al putting standard C names in the global namespace as well as in namespace std, which is legal. We all agree it's not legal to also put

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #18) Comment 8 is only referring to cstdio et al putting standard C names in the global namespace as well as in namespace std, which is

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) Has anyone checked recently what exactly we still need -D_GNU_SOURCE for in the public headers (as opposed to just the libstdc++ code),

[Bug libstdc++/56019] max_align_t should be in std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56019 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/57583] New: large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 Bug ID: 57583 Summary: large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #20) (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) Has anyone checked recently what exactly we still need -D_GNU_SOURCE for in the public

[Bug c/57584] New: ice: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584 Bug ID: 57584 Summary: ice: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/30604] Unable to coalesce ssa_names x and y which are marked as MUST COALESCE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604 --- Comment #17 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16) Can you open a new bugreport please? It's very likely a different reason than this one. After a lot of fiddling about, please

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- If I remember correctly, the gthr.h included by ext/atomicity.h is also a big issue. If we switch to a non-reference-counted basic_string we can make progress but another usage

[Bug target/57583] large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Apparently GAS has lost its BROKEN_DOT_WORD handing.

[Bug libstdc++/57585] New: New --enable-clocale model using POSIX 2008

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57585 Bug ID: 57585 Summary: New --enable-clocale model using POSIX 2008 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- So, perhaps this is solveable only through cooperation with glibc folks. I guess a start for that would be to do an audit of the libstdc++ headers, what symbols does it need from the

[Bug c++/53096] [DR 1333] [c++11] should be possible to default a copy ctor that takes non-const arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53096 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23) changed, the question would be what should be the new G++ feature test macro defaults, for -std=gnu++{98,11,1y} I guess it should

[Bug rtl-optimization/57430] Redundant move instruction is produced after function inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57430 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- I have not seen any comments about my latest note - have you any ideas about this issue? Thanks ahead.

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #25 from Nick Maclaren nmm1 at cam dot ac.uk --- Strictly, don't you mean feature selection macros? It isn't worth being too perfectionist on this, as the standards (both de jure and de facto) are an ungodly mess, and it is getting

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- No, I mean what I wrote, see http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/xsh_chap02_02.html info libc 'Feature Test Macros' etc.

[Bug target/50807] [avr] Constructor writing to RAM for variable in Flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50807 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment

[Bug preprocessor/57580] Repeated _Pragma message directives in macro causes problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/57358] segmentation fault with attribute(optimize(O0))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57358 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/57358] segmentation fault with attribute(optimize(O0))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57358 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/57583] large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602 is the corresponding binutils/gas bug.

[Bug c/57584] ice: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/43745] [avr] g++ puts VTABLES in SRAM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43745 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |c++ --- Comment

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6) Jason, can you please look at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00433.html I approved it the same day you posted it. :)

[Bug rtl-optimization/57569] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code for struct copy at -O3 on x86_64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57569 --- Comment #3 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- It's cse, and it's because it indeed uses the wrong dependence test. The CSE tables holds values read from memory which are supposed to be clobbered by following writes, i.e.

[Bug target/57586] New: ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 Bug ID: 57586 Summary: ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 --- Comment #1 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- A bisect shows that this bug first occurs after r197095: 2013-03-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de * emit-rtl.c (set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos): Remove alignment

[Bug c/57587] New: RFE: 'maybenull' attribute.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57587 Bug ID: 57587 Summary: RFE: 'maybenull' attribute. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/57584] ice: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/57581] abi_tag vs. demangler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57581 Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- (In reply to comment #17) Yeah, MachO is broken by design, guess the tests need to be restricted to non-darwin non-PE. Questions: (1) What is PE? (2) Is the second return

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 --- Comment #4 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30293 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30293action=edit Less reduced failing testcase Yes, the same thing happens for packed versions of those structs.

[Bug fortran/43412] [OOP] BT_CLASS does not does not set array spec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43412 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 Bug 18918 depends on bug 43412, which changed state. Bug 43412 Summary: [OOP] BT_CLASS does not does not set array spec http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43412 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/57535] [OOP] ICE when allocating a CLASS function-result variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57535 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Jun 11 14:58:55 2013 New Revision: 199958 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199958root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-06-11 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/57535] [OOP] ICE when allocating a CLASS function-result variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57535 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- The mingw/cygwin stuff. The testcases assume that the symbols have decl_binds_to_current_def_p false, if that isn't the case (because darwin/mingw apparently don't allow symbol

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 --- Comment #4 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/50390] gcc hangs while compiling invalid c++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50436] Crash or hang on invalid template code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50436 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/52143] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic function result in gfc_class_vptr_get

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52143 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- It looks like a duplicate of pr57535.

[Bug fortran/57305] ICE with warnings and unlimited polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/49074] [OOP] Defined assignment w/ CLASS arrays: Incomplete error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Bug fortran/57508] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Intrinsic assignment+defined-assignment for comps: PROCEDURE attribute of '_F.DA0' conflicts with VARIABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Jun 11 16:18:13 2013 New Revision: 199961 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199961root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-06-11 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/57508] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Intrinsic assignment+defined-assignment for comps: PROCEDURE attribute of '_F.DA0' conflicts with VARIABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on the GCC 4.8 branch. Patch pending for the trunk, cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00064.html

[Bug c++/57588] New: [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588 Bug ID: 57588 Summary: [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57588] [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Isn't this just http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition ?

[Bug c++/57588] [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Although shouldn't it fail to compile, due to private destructor and copy constructor?

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/56939] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Derived type is being used before it is defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56939 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/52143] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic function result in gfc_class_vptr_get

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52143 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/57535] [OOP] ICE when allocating a CLASS function-result variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57535 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- *** Bug 52143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/56939] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Derived type is being used before it is defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56939 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57588] [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588 --- Comment #3 from Matt Clarkson mattyclarkson at gmail dot com --- Thanks for that link, its very informative :) I can see why it fails to link now. About the private destructor, I'd expect it to not compile, but it does. I actually didn't

[Bug target/57589] New: Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Bug ID: 57589 Summary: Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30294 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30294action=edit Proposed patch to fix problem

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- It has been fixed between revisions 194721 and 195140.

[Bug fortran/57590] New: [OOP] class containers are recycled between symbols more than they should be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 Bug ID: 57590 Summary: [OOP] class containers are recycled between symbols more than they should be Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/42021] Misleading error message when inherited typedefs cause ambiguity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42021 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] class containers are recycled between symbols more than they should be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #0) This bug was found while trying to fix pr57297. By the way pr57297 is the reverse problem (not enough sharing instead of too much).

[Bug fortran/52392] internal compiler error occurs when compilin files separately but not when all is in one file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52392 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- It seems to have been fixed at revision 171654. It works with 4.7.3, 4.8.1, and trunk. The 4.6 version is no longer supported. I think this PR could be closed as fixed.

[Bug fortran/52227] [OOP] TARGET attribute mishandled in polymorphic types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52227 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/51610] [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and TARGET

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/53951] [OOP] Later TARGET statement ignored for CLASS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53951 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/52392] internal compiler error occurs when compilin files separately but not when all is in one file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52392 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30294|0 |1

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30295|0 |1

[Bug fortran/44604] Wrong run-time checks with VALUE dummies and pointer/allocatable actuals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44604 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/57591] New: gcc-4.8 libbacktrace btest failure on Linux ppc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57591 Bug ID: 57591 Summary: gcc-4.8 libbacktrace btest failure on Linux ppc64 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/57592] New: ICE in tree_unroll_loops_completely at -O3

-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com With current gcc trunk on x86_64-linux, the following code causes an ICE when compiled at -O3. This is a regression from 4.8.x. $ gcc-trunk -v gcc version 4.9.0 20130611 (experimental