http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
--- Comment #9 from jbeulich at novell dot com ---
But that's the point - the compiler takes the liberty to treat start != end
as always true, and start end as being replaceable with start = end.
Hence a respective for() loop could in the first
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56596
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57749
Bug ID: 57749
Summary: -ffpe-trap=zero or invalid produces SIGFPE on complex
zero ** 1e0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30406
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30406action=edit
Reduced testcase
Reduced testcase, compile with -march=armv5te -marm -mtune=xscale
-mfloat-abi=soft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57682
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53356
tormen quickhelp at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quickhelp at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36041
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 28 09:28:40 2013
New Revision: 200506
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200506root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/36041
* libgcc2.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53356
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Well, the fix which went in only touched the *C++* front-end, whereas your
issue is triggered by *C* code, thus it definitely seems a different issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53356
--- Comment #10 from tormen quickhelp at gmail dot com ---
I didn't notice the Component c++ yet :)
-
Good point you have there :)
So ... I better file a new then or as it's the same error message here is fine
?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53356
--- Comment #11 from tormen quickhelp at gmail dot com ---
OK that was a stupid question: New bug it should be.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53356
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
If what I said makes sense, and I think it does, despite the internal error
coming from the same place, it's an unrelated C issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57750
Bug ID: 57750
Summary: Internal compiler error when initializing struct
member with array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57751
Bug ID: 57751
Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at
cp/semantics.c:7648
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36041
--- Comment #23 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
I think it is a bad idea to introduce the IFUNC into libgcc_s, because then
while you speed up the few users of this builtin, you slow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36041
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #23)
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
I think it is a bad idea to introduce the IFUNC into libgcc_s, because then
while you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57752
Bug ID: 57752
Summary: during the lookup for a base class name, non-type
names should be ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57725
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57751
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52544
Rodrigo Campos rodrigo at sdfg dot com.ar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rodrigo at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57753
Bug ID: 57753
Summary: FSF gcc bootstrap needs to use xcrun to bootstrap
post-darwin12
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57752
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There's a cross-reference to [basic.scope.hiding] which explains how a class
name can be hidden by variables, members and enumerators, and it seems that
both G++ and clang interpret
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57754
Bug ID: 57754
Summary: Loongson 3A is MIPS64R2-compatible
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57753
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
I should also note that removal of SDK from / isn't as bad as it sounds. In
general, most builds can puzzle out the location of the necessary headers.
However, FSF gcc is a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52544
--- Comment #5 from Rodrigo Campos rodrigo at sdfg dot com.ar ---
Ohh, forgot to say, but if I just don't compile with -finstrument-functions
the code works as expected. With gcc 4.7, 4.5 and 4.4.
Although, when I compile with gcc 4.5 and 4.4,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57744
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30404|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57755
Bug ID: 57755
Summary: Improve fold_binary_op_with_conditional_arg
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57749
Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57687
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |x86_64-apple-darwin10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57736
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57750
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57750
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka jh at suse dot cz ---
As described in patch the change is intentional. finalized/analyzed
flags come from pre unit at a time. ipa code should not care about
analyzed bit. i will look what broke.
Honza
Cituji
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57755
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |glisse at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57645
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57756
Bug ID: 57756
Summary: Function target attribute is retaining state of
previously seen function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57753
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
Okay, the bootstrap without headers outside of the SDK can be simplified on
darwin to…
./configure -with-native-system-header-dir=`xcrun --show-sdk-path`/usr/include
40 matches
Mail list logo