http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57994
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The MPFR documentation does claim that it strictly conforms to annex F (with an
explanation on how to emulate subnormals), though it isn't clear if that claim
only concerns +-*/sqrt or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57999
Bug ID: 57999
Summary: Missed constant propagation into trampolines
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57285
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Why the hell do we disable the dimension check for CLASS variables?
Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/check.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57285
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58000
Bug ID: 58000
Summary: Accept OPEN( ... NAME=) with -std=legacy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001
Bug ID: 58001
Summary: Make it possible to silence Extension: Tab character
in format warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58002
Bug ID: 58002
Summary: [IR tracking] Pointer function results in non pointer
context: Shall use a temporary
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31016
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31016
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6)
Working on it a little bit.
I believe that the middle end prefers the use of ARRAY_RANGE_REF to the use of
memcpy. The reason is that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57285
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57285
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57991
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jul 27 14:17:01 2013
New Revision: 201286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201286root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-07-27 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57991
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58000
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #26 from Evgeniy Dushistov dushistov at mail dot ru ---
I try such simple C++ function, compiled in separate object file(-march=native
-Ofast):
void mult(const double * const __restrict__ A, const double * const
__restrict__ B,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #27 from Evgeniy Dushistov dushistov at mail dot ru ---
Created attachment 30563
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30563action=edit
icc -c -Ofast -march=native objdump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54633
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58003
Bug ID: 58003
Summary: internal compiler error: in convert_mpz_to_unsigned,
at fortran/simplify.c:165
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54961
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57954
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch ---
confirmed that the patch fixes the issue
c++ -O2 -march=corei7-avx polyAVX.cpp
time ./a.out
10358474048
2.965u 0.001s 0:02.97 99.6%0+0k 0+0io 146pf+0w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58004
Bug ID: 58004
Summary: Internal compiler error in unify_one_argument, at
cp/pt.c:15445
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #62 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Laurent Aflonsi from comment #61)
More generally, I'm surprised to see that optimization at mapping level,
isn't this a generic problematic that should be handled at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52844
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lin90162
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58004
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58005
Bug ID: 58005
Summary: missed optimization printf constant string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57994
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Today I was thinking that given that, per docs and testsuite (double checked
yesterday) the mpfr functions are able to cope with +-Inf arguments to the
mathematical functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58003
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58005
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58005
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57994
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
An example of MPC not following all the Annex G special cases is that
catanh (1 + i0) is specified in Annex G to return Inf + i0 with
divide-by-zero
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57994
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #5)
Today I was thinking that given that, per docs and testsuite (double checked
yesterday) the mpfr functions are able to cope with +-Inf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58005
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
Such an optimization can increase code size (well, the total size of
string constants in the program) if the same format string is used with
many different
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57994
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
About sin(Inf): I checked that with / without the real_isfinite the expression
evaluated in every case the same, -nan, if I remember correctly. I don't have
more details at the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57994
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #7)
An example of MPC not following all the Annex G special cases is that
catanh (1 + i0) is specified in Annex G to return Inf + i0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57994
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
About testing, it would be just matter of extending/updating what Kaveh Ghazi
set up when mpfr/mpc came in.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58006
Bug ID: 58006
Summary: ICE regression compiling VegaStrike on f19 with
-ffast-math and -ftree-parallelize-loops=2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58003
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Chris Gilbreth from comment #0)
(Is this valid Fortran?)
First, it is definitely a bug - internal compiler errors are always a bug.
Regarding the validity: The number
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57921
Doug Gilmore dgilmore at mips dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgilmore at mips
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58006
--- Comment #2 from ermo.gcc.gnu.org at spammesenseless dot net ---
Created attachment 30564
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30564action=edit
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58006
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58005
--- Comment #4 from Evgeniy Dushistov dushistov at mail dot ru ---
Such an optimization can increase code size
if the same format string is used with
many different arguments,
may be then two fputs calls?
fputs(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__, stdout);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58006
--- Comment #3 from ermo.gcc.gnu.org at spammesenseless dot net ---
@Paolo:
*sigh* -- I suspected that it wasn't ever going to be as simple as describing
what I did to trigger the ICE. Sorry for polluting bugzilla with an incomplete
bug-report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58006
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57945
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57993
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
More complete fix submitted as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01326.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57914
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugdal at aerifal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
Bug ID: 58007
Summary: ICE -- free_pi_tree(): Unresolved fixup, depends on
order of module inclusion
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
50 matches
Mail list logo