http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
Bug ID: 58165
Summary: [4.8/4.9 regression] internal compiler error:
verify_flow_info
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The guilty revision is:
No that just exposed the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58163
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
This is a debug-mode test: check-debug itself passes -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG. Just
browse the log, if you aren't a believer ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58105
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Hello!
I am away from my keyboard for a couple of days, but I will take care
of your patch.
Thanks,
Uros.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:01 PM, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58166
Bug ID: 58166
Summary: ARMv5: poor register allocation in function containing
smull instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com ---
I firstly did something like that:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c b/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c
index 9b6186e..5862ebf 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alexander Ivchenko from comment #4)
I firstly did something like that:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c b/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c
index 9b6186e..5862ebf 100644
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30661|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com ---
Well, that wouldn't be sufficient, you'd need to also remove the EH edges
from the other bb. But not splitting the block means you don't have to
bother with that.
Well,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58164
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58164
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51559
Ganton kubry at terra dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kubry at terra dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58167
Bug ID: 58167
Summary: compile crush
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58167
--- Comment #1 from leanid leanid.chaika at gmail dot com ---
file can't compile: http://ubuntuone.com/1Pwt7bzCgPDFgaR90gchRy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58168
Bug ID: 58168
Summary: Installation of GCC 4.8.1 (libstdc++) hangs in
make_sunver.pl on Solaris10/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58167
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58168
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158
--- Comment #1 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi ---
A simplified reproducer:
$ cat bar.c
extern void foo(void);
static inline double max(const double x, const double y)
{
return (x y) ? x : y;
}
void bar(int d)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58169
Bug ID: 58169
Summary: missed load PRE related to array index truncation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58128
--- Comment #4 from Ellis N. Thomas ExtraLeveLInSoftware at ntlworld dot com
---
The decision to close this without any action seems unjustified. The problem
is being rejected on the basis that the handling of the exception is faulty in
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58170
Bug ID: 58170
Summary: Crash when aliasing a template class that is a member
of its template base class.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58113
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58171
Bug ID: 58171
Summary: Incorrect error message on invalid code when using
class constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-*-*, crisv32-*-* |
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58172
Bug ID: 58172
Summary: ifcvt test failures for armv8-a
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50955
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am running into a similar situation with a modified 4.7 on mips64-linux-gnu
(configured to use the Octeon2 instructions which has a load instruction which
does base+index [or
29 matches
Mail list logo
