[Bug fortran/58100] Spurious DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100 --- Comment #5 from Roland Kaufmann roland.kaufmann at uni dot no --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3) Roland: Is the new warning option -W(no-)zerotrip sufficient for you? As a general principle: I believe that the compiler should

[Bug java/58215] New: -fwhole-program cause gcj undefined reference to `Main::class$'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58215 Bug ID: 58215 Summary: -fwhole-program cause gcj undefined reference to `Main::class$' Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/58209] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_range_from_binary_expr, at tree-vrp.c:2294

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58209 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/58216] New: ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:19484

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58216 Bug ID: 58216 Summary: ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:19484 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/58217] New: warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58217 Bug ID: 58217 Summary: warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/58217] warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58217 --- Comment #1 from Olivier MATZ z...@droids-corp.org --- Created attachment 30685 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30685action=edit code that triggers the issue

[Bug c/58217] warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58217 --- Comment #2 from Olivier MATZ z...@droids-corp.org --- Created attachment 30686 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30686action=edit gcc -dumpspecs

[Bug c/58217] warning when assigning a function pointer field in a structure having the may_alias attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58217 --- Comment #3 from Olivier MATZ z...@droids-corp.org --- Created attachment 30687 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30687action=edit intermediate file foo.i

[Bug target/58166] ARMv5: poor register allocation in function containing smull instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58166 --- Comment #3 from Jay Foad jay.foad at gmail dot com --- I've bisected this to r191805: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=191805 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01764.html

[Bug c++/56380] Const/reference mutable members are not always rejected in class templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56380 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/53756] [C++1y] ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:18774 with -g and operator auto ()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53756 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.nixman

[Bug c++/58216] ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:19484

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58216 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/58185] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE when selector in SELECT TYPE is non-polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58185 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on trunk with the commit below. Backport pending. Author: janus Date: Thu Aug 22 11:49:46 2013 New Revision: 201919 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201919root=gccview=rev Log:

[Bug target/58166] ARMv5: poor register allocation in function containing smull instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58166 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at

[Bug target/58166] ARMv5: poor register allocation in function containing smull instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58166 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jay Foad from comment #3) I've bisected this to r191805: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=191805

[Bug other/58202] [graphite] qtcore-4.8* (compiling with glib support):error fatal: glib.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58202 --- Comment #2 from dE de.techno at gmail dot com --- I don't know... what else can be provided apart from the build log (which are attached in the Gentoo bug). Anyway, the instructions?

[Bug ada/40936] Assert_Failure atree.adb:884 on illegal code (mixture of protected object and accept of entry family)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40936 --- Comment #4 from nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr --- I let you decide if this is related, but I get the same 4.6.4 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure atree.adb:794 with this source package Bug is package P is type T is new Integer;

[Bug c/58218] New: -mcmodel=medium cause assembler warning ignoring incorrect section type for .lbss

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58218 Bug ID: 58218 Summary: -mcmodel=medium cause assembler warning ignoring incorrect section type for .lbss Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/58218] -mcmodel=medium cause assembler warning ignoring incorrect section type for .lbss

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58218 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- I can reproduce with gcc-4.7.3. It generates: .section.lbss,aw,@progbits gas doesn't like ,@progbits on .lbss and ignores it; readelf on the produced .o file then

[Bug middle-end/52306] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.8.1 --- Comment

[Bug c++/56380] Const/reference mutable members are not always rejected in class templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56380 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/58218] -mcmodel=medium cause assembler warning ignoring incorrect section type for .lbss

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58218 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug libstdc++/53477] pretty printer fails with: Python Exception type 'exceptions.IndexError' list index out of range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.9.0 --- Comment

[Bug c++/53618] segfault on self-referential class partial specialization argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53618 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/51488] ICE on infinite template recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Another one: c++/53618

[Bug target/58158] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150 while compiling ImageMagick on mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/58158] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150 while compiling ImageMagick on mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/58158] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with conditional moves on GPRs with a floating point conditional on mipsel with loongson2f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2

[Bug target/58219] New: [SH] mov.l insn length is wrong on SH2A

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58219 Bug ID: 58219 Summary: [SH] mov.l insn length is wrong on SH2A Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/58220] New: [4.9 Regression] Many new failures for SH after rev. 201833

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58220 Bug ID: 58220 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Many new failures for SH after rev. 201833 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #66 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30689 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30689action=edit WIP RTL pass Just wanted to give an update on the issue. I've been writing an SH specific

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #67 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #66) Kaz, the WIP status aside, would you be OK with something like that? Yep. Sounds good to me.

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #21 from Easwaran Raman eraman at google dot com --- Created attachment 30690 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30690action=edit Proposed patch

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #22 from Easwaran Raman eraman at google dot com --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #20) Yes, the patch maybe fixes the debuginfo issue, but there's something else that is wrong. E.g., on the testcase from PR58018, we have

[Bug regression/58221] New: [4.9 Regression]: Immense amount of execution regressions and increased test-time for cris-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58221 Bug ID: 58221 Summary: [4.9 Regression]: Immense amount of execution regressions and increased test-time for cris-elf Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/58222] New: built-in:0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 Bug ID: 58222 Summary: built-in:0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug fortran/58222] built-in:0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 --- Comment #1 from blake.fumberger at gmail dot com --- reviewing the attached file shows that line 45 wasn't in the correct position. After fixing this, the compiler still doesn't cooperate.

[Bug fortran/58222] built-in:0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/58222] built-in:0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 --- Comment #3 from blake.fumberger at gmail dot com --- What compiler options did you use? I haven't changed any options with post-install. Where did you get the compiler you are using? The compiler was downloaded from this link:

[Bug fortran/58222] built-in:0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:07:07AM +, blake.fumberger at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #3 from blake.fumberger at gmail dot com --- What compiler options did you

[Bug tree-optimization/58223] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

. $ gcc-trunk -v gcc version 4.9.0 20130822 (experimental) [trunk revision 201915] (GCC) $ gcc-4.7 -O3 reduced.c $ a.out 1 $ gcc-trunk -O2 reduced.c $ a.out 1 $ gcc-trunk -O3 reduced.c $ a.out 0 $ gcc-4.8 -O3 reduced.c $ a.out 0 $ --- int printf (const char

[Bug fortran/58224] New: -fcheck=pointer should detect that an unallocated allocatable data-target is forbidden

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58224 Bug ID: 58224 Summary: -fcheck=pointer should detect that an unallocated allocatable data-target is forbidden Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED