http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58467
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58467
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Sep 20 06:08:44 2013
New Revision: 202764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202764root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Janus' submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-08/msg00026.html
Looks great and fixes also comment 10's test case.
* * *
I tried to test for the intrinsic elemental
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58335
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58335
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038
Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #40 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #38 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Sep 20 07:44:05 2013
New Revision: 202766
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202766root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/58099
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58477
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58473
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58478
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58464
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #15)
Author: janus
Date: Fri Sep 20 07:44:05 2013
New Revision: 202766
This commit fixes the original regression of comment 0 on trunk (backport to
4.8 pending).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #16)
TODO: Fix also the issue with PURE/ELEMENTAL reported in comment 14.
Here is a small patch which does it:
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58470
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #3 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com ---
Thanks Richard, will check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can be fixed with this patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/primary.c(revision 202765)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com ---
Backporting fixes the problem. Can we go ahead and backport to 4.8?
Can we add the testcase to the testsuite as well please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #17)
(In reply to janus from comment #16)
TODO: Fix also the issue with PURE/ELEMENTAL reported in comment 14.
Here is a small patch which does it:
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58480
Bug ID: 58480
Summary: Use attribute((nonnull)) to optimize callers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58473
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 20 10:19:12 2013
New Revision: 202774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202774root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58417
Bug 58417 depends on bug 58473, which changed state.
Bug 58473 Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL:
ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58473
What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58473
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #4 from Paulo J.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
--- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com ---
(In
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
Bug ID: 58481
Summary: Internal compiler error when passing argument packs to
base class method inside a lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #18)
This is avoided by the following improved patch (which just 'silently' sets
the attributes):
That version still yields a good number of testsuite failures,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #19)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
Here one gets:
ptr4 = cos
1
Error: Explicit interface required for '' at (1): elemental
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
--- Comment #1 from Damian Kaczmarek rush at rushbase dot net ---
clang and VS2013 work properly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
Bug ID: 58482
Summary: gomp4: user defined reduction produce wrong result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
Bug ID: 58483
Summary: missing optimization opportunity for const std::vector
compared to std::array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
--- Comment #2 from dennis luehring dl.soluz at gmx dot net ---
i missed the commandline
g++-4.8 -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fdump-tree-optimized test.cpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
Andrey Ponomarenko aponomarenko at rosalab dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
Bug ID: 58484
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in chrec_fold_plus_1, at
tree-chrec.c:272 building 416.gamess
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
SUBROUTINE UMPSE(AIBJ,NOC,NDIM,NOCA,NVIRA,NOCCA,E2)
DIMENSION AIBJ(NOC,NDIM,*)
DO 20 MA=1,NVIRA
DO 20 MI=1,NOCA
DO 10 MB=1,MA
MBI =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With -ftree-loop-distribution we fuse the first and the last partition
resulting in correct code again. We're really missing partition dependencies -
see PR53616.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 20 12:21:08 2013
New Revision: 202775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202775root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
Andrey Ponomarenko aponomarenko at rosalab dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58485
Bug ID: 58485
Summary: [4.9 Regression] GMP test on subnormal fails with LTO
and -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58485
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net ---
I forgot:
Version: GNU MP 5.1.2
Host type: coreinhm-unknown-linux-gnu
ABI: 64
Install prefix:/usr/local
Compiler:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hm, so are we expecting that instantiate_scev_r through
static tree
instantiate_scev_binary (basic_block instantiate_below,
struct loop *evolution_loop,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58485
Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58413
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Sep 20 13:26:07 2013
New Revision: 202776
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202776root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is well known that we don't vectorize this, right now we only handle
accesses to the SIMD lane privatized vars that cover the whole size of those
vars, while in your testcase the
Din online konto vil blive begrænset
Dit kreditkort : 4571
Vi har for nylig opdaget, at der i dag var 3 forkerte login-
forsøg på din konto
Følgende IP-adresser blev registreret:
Ugyldigt login fra : *.*.68.122.rogers.com
Ugyldigt login fra : *.*.88.90.charter.net
Ugyldigt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch ---
Thanks Jakub for the clear answer.
The reduction operator should be strictly commutative!
and I now understand the meaning of
omp declare reduction (I hope)
so I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58475
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #41 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #40)
The issue is that we added the movmisaling-on-component-ref path
for _correctness_ reasons. Now, if all misaligned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #42 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Fri Sep 20 14:10:14 2013
New Revision: 202778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202778root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58355
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[F03] ICE with TYPE,|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58359
Anatoly Sinyavin a.sinyavin at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038
Jacek Caban jacek at codeweavers dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
--- Comment #3 from dennis luehring dl.soluz at gmx dot net ---
according to the feedback from the clang mailing list by Benjamin Kramer
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-September/032111.html
llvm seems to not have any problem in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58467
--- Comment #6 from Paul Smith psmith at gnu dot org ---
A minor typo:
- attached to a variable with the static storage,
+ attached to a variable with static storage,
Also, I wonder if it might be helpful to be clear that it can ONLY be applied
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Sep 20 15:50:09 2013
New Revision: 202781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202781root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Sep 20 15:50:09 2013
New Revision: 202781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202781root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56166
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Sep 20 15:50:09 2013
New Revision: 202781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202781root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Does mingw provide its own SSE/MMX intrinsic implementations?
Can mingw just include xmmintrin.h where SSE/MMX instrincis
is needed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #10 from Richard Neill gcc at richardneill dot org ---
Thank you for adding this - I will certainly find it useful!
May I suggest that this warning be implicitly enabled by -Wextra, (even if it's
not enabled by -Wall) ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58467
--- Comment #5 from Paul Smith psmith at gnu dot org ---
Thank you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Indeed, let's avoid the big functional, this is enough:
struct Test {
templatetypename... Args inline void triggerTest (Args... fargs) { }
};
struct TestPickled : Test {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58476
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem occurs because I use --disable-static.
If I remove this, the bootstrap completes.
I am not sure whether or not this is a supported configuration.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56875
--- Comment #5 from Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de ---
Created attachment 30872
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30872action=edit
Updated patch including testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
Joshua Cogliati jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Smolsky oleg at smolsky dot net ---
BTW, I get an identical deadlock with ASan:
#0 0x7fe631504ae9 in syscall () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x7fe63363ddc0 in __sanitizer::internal_sched_yield ()
at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58486
Bug ID: 58486
Summary: insufficient CFI generated for call-saved VFP
registers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58476
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bootstrap failure with Go |In top-level
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58481
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
BTW, I did look at walking up the CFG to discover edge equivalences we could
add to our tables. We don't have access to the path through the dominator tree
that we've followed, so I had
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #9 from Joshua Cogliati jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com ---
Created attachment 30871
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30871action=edit
some floating conversion issues
This tests three of the floating conversion
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 20 17:49:45 2013
New Revision: 202790
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202790root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57605
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 20 17:52:29 2013
New Revision: 202791
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202791root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/57605
libstdc++-v3/
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #6 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Is that the full stack trace?
(As usual, a reproducer will help us much)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58417
Bug 58417 depends on bug 58484, which changed state.
Bug 58484 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in chrec_fold_plus_1, at
tree-chrec.c:272 building 416.gamess
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58484
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Smolsky oleg at smolsky dot net ---
Hold on, I don't get the more memory bit. This happens very early, before
anything else of merit. Also, it turns out that this isn't a deadlock, the main
thread is spinning inside asan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
--- Comment #11 from Dima dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu dot com ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
Created attachment 30818 [details]
patch
Can you verify that this patch fixes the issue?
Yes, it works for me and makes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #10 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Your stack traces tells me this:
__sanitizer::MmapOrDie calls strerror, which means that mmap call failed.
This may happen if the process OOM-ed (unlikely in your case),
or may
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Smolsky oleg at smolsky dot net ---
Sure. The verbose thing does not yield much:
==1236== Parsed ASAN_OPTIONS: verbosity=1
==1236== AddressSanitizer: libc interceptors initialized
|| `[0x10007fff8000, 0x7fff]` ||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58487
Bug ID: 58487
Summary: Missed return value optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #12 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You can also try
ASAN_OPTIONS=malloc_context_size=1 (or 0)
this will eliminate this particular call to mmap (but will reduce the
usefulness
of asan report)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56875
--- Comment #6 from jbglaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jbglaw
Date: Fri Sep 20 19:00:02 2013
New Revision: 202796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202796root=gccview=rev
Log:
Work around buggy gas not properly sign-extending a 64bit value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Smolsky oleg at smolsky dot net ---
Created attachment 30874
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30874action=edit
full stack
Here is the full stack. It comes from the very same spot in my app.
As for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #11 from Joshua Cogliati jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com ---
Created attachment 30873
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30873action=edit
Patch to add -Wfloat-conversion option
This version also is enabled with -Wextra.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #8 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ouch!
free calling malloc. this is not going to work :)
This code has changed since our last merge to gcc --
the trunk version does not have strerror call any more.
I really
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #2)
Can be fixed with this patch:
... which regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Smolsky oleg at smolsky dot net ---
Created attachment 30875
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30875action=edit
another stack
ASAN_OPTIONS=malloc_context_size=1 gets me passed the initial issue, but the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch looks mostly correct to me, but you will need a few extra details
before a maintainer (not me!) can accept it.
* You need to bootstrap + run the testsuite. You don't
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
