[Bug c++/58510] [4.9 regression] [c++0x] ICE with multiple non-static data initializations in union

2013-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58510 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug bootstrap/58509] [4.9 regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:397 breaks Ada bootstrap on sparc64-linux

2013-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58509 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/58508] [Missed-Optimization] Redundant vector load of actual loop invariant in loop body.

2013-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58508 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/55469] memory leak on read with istat.ne.0

2013-09-24 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55469 --- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- This bug is a bit of showstopper for doing automatic leak testing with gperftools (essentially all our regtests have a non-zero error code with this leak being

[Bug rtl-optimization/58519] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in eliminate_regs_1

2013-09-24 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519 Bug ID: 58519 Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in eliminate_regs_1 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/58509] [4.9 regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:397 breaks Ada bootstrap on sparc64-linux

2013-09-24 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58509 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- (gdb) break fancy_abort Breakpoint 2 at 0x9e4a04 (gdb) run -gnatwa -quiet -nostdinc -dumpbase g-awk.adb -auxbase-strip g-awk.o -O2 -Wextra -Wall -fPIC -g -gnatpg -mcpu=ultrasparc

[Bug libstdc++/58338] Add noexcept to functions with a narrow contract

2013-09-24 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: glisse Date: Tue Sep 24 10:07:32 2013 New Revision: 202861 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202861root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-09-24 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr PR

[Bug libstdc++/56166] std::string::clear() can throw despite being marked noexcept

2013-09-24 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56166 --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: glisse Date: Tue Sep 24 10:07:32 2013 New Revision: 202861 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202861root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-09-24 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr

[Bug libstdc++/58265] [lwg/2063] std::string move assignment should be noexcept

2013-09-24 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: glisse Date: Tue Sep 24 10:07:32 2013 New Revision: 202861 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202861root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-09-24 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/58519] [4.9 regression] ICE in eliminate_regs_1

2013-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug bootstrap/58509] [4.9 regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:397 breaks Ada bootstrap on sparc64-linux

2013-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58509 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/58513] *var and MEM[(const int )var] (var has int* type) are not treated as the same data ref.

2013-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58513 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 24 11:04:04 2013 New Revision: 202865 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202865root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-09-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/58513] *var and MEM[(const int )var] (var has int* type) are not treated as the same data ref.

2013-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58513 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/57134] [4.9 Regression] ICE with -mstrict-align and inline assembly on ppc64

2013-09-24 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57134 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Sep 24 11:32:28 2013 New Revision: 202866 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202866root=gccview=rev Log: PR middle-end/57134 PR middle-end/57586 *

[Bug middle-end/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

2013-09-24 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Sep 24 11:32:28 2013 New Revision: 202866 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202866root=gccview=rev Log: PR middle-end/57134 PR middle-end/57586 *

[Bug middle-end/57134] [4.9 Regression] ICE with -mstrict-align and inline assembly on ppc64

2013-09-24 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57134 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

2013-09-24 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58518] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE with template specialization

2013-09-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58518 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug bootstrap/58509] [4.9 regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:397 during Ada runtime build

2013-09-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58509 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc-linux |sparc-*-*

[Bug c++/58516] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with __transaction_atomic

2013-09-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58516 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/57973] incorrect access check for protected member of template base with using

2013-09-24 Thread dyjay_love at 126 dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57973 caroline dyjay_love at 126 dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dyjay_love at 126 dot

[Bug c++/58516] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with __transaction_atomic

2013-09-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58516 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Maybe something like the following might fix it? --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c @@ -5199,7 +5199,9 @@ finish_transaction_stmt (tree stmt, tree compound_stmt, int

[Bug c++/58516] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with __transaction_atomic

2013-09-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58516 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Or alternatively ... --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c @@ -5199,7 +5199,9 @@ finish_transaction_stmt (tree stmt, tree compound_stmt, int flags, tree noex) {

[Bug tree-optimization/58520] New: GCC fails to vectorize loop

2013-09-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58520 Bug ID: 58520 Summary: GCC fails to vectorize loop Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/58520] GCC fails to vectorize loop

2013-09-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58520 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/58520] GCC fails to vectorize loop

2013-09-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58520 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30887 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30887action=edit Assembler generated by ICC

[Bug tree-optimization/58520] GCC fails to vectorize loop

2013-09-24 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58520 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- By the way, I think that saying which specific command line options you are using is *much* more important than providing CPU brand and model, because the optimizers do not

[Bug rtl-optimization/58519] [4.9 regression] ICE in eliminate_regs_1

2013-09-24 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519 Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|m68k-*-*|m68k-*-* mips*-*-*

[Bug target/58490] __sync_bool_compare_and_swap sign bit failure

2013-09-24 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58490 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can you let me know whether http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00553.html fixes the problem?

[Bug rtl-optimization/58519] [4.9 regression] ICE in eliminate_regs_1

2013-09-24 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/293919 for a possible patch.

[Bug rtl-optimization/58519] [4.9 regression] ICE in eliminate_regs_1

2013-09-24 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519 --- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org --- That fixed the small testcase I created, I will try a complete build next. For the record the test case that fails with MIPS GCC (-O2 -g -mips64) is: _vdiprintf_r(struct _reent *ptr ,

[Bug c++/58511] [4.9 Regression] [c++0x] ICE using static const member variable in constexpr

2013-09-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58511 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/58510] [4.9 regression] [c++0x] ICE with multiple non-static data initializations in union

2013-09-24 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58510 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/58521] New: [4.9 Regression] bootstrap failure

2013-09-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58521 Bug ID: 58521 Summary: [4.9 Regression] bootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/58441] [4.9 Regression] VTV headers are installed into the general include directory

2013-09-24 Thread ctice at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58441 --- Comment #5 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30888 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30888action=edit Patch to fix the problem The Makefile was installing the headers in the wrong place. This patch should

[Bug bootstrap/58441] [4.9 Regression] VTV headers are installed into the general include directory

2013-09-24 Thread ctice at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58441 ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/58521] [4.9 Regression] bootstrap failure

2013-09-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58521 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- I have a different boostrap failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10: /opt/gcc/build_w/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/opt/gcc/build_w/./prev-gcc/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.9w/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/bin/

[Bug bootstrap/58441] [4.9 Regression] VTV headers are installed into the general include directory

2013-09-24 Thread ctice at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58441 ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/58522] New: ICE with segfault at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-09-24 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130924 (experimental) [trunk revision 202859] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c $ gcc-4.8 -O3 small.c $ gcc

[Bug c++/36587] Feature: add warning for constructor call with discarded return.

2013-09-24 Thread schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587 Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/58522] [4.9 Regression] ICE with segfault at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-09-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58522 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/36587] Feature: add warning for constructor call with discarded return.

2013-09-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Johannes Schaub from comment #7) Jonathan, unfortunately that code won't create and discard a temporary object, Yes, you're right, there's no temporary so it's not

[Bug c++/36587] Feature: add warning for constructor call with discarded return.

2013-09-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I still think it would be nice to get a warning for e.g. std::unique_lockM(m); where M m is visible in an enclosing scope and would have been a viable argument for another

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

2013-09-24 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30689|0 |1 is

[Bug tree-optimization/58522] [4.9 Regression] ICE with segfault at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-09-24 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58522 --- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) Started with r199048, so sounds like one of the many dups of the reassoc scheduling bugs. Jakub, I think you are right. I somehow forgot to

[Bug c++/57973] incorrect access check for protected member of template base with using

2013-09-24 Thread dyjay_love at 126 dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57973 --- Comment #4 from caroline dyjay_love at 126 dot com --- (In reply to caroline from comment #3) Dose someone know how this bug been fixed in 4.8.2?

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2013-09-24 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #39 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- *** Bug 58522 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/58522] [4.9 Regression] ICE with segfault at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-09-24 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58522 Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/21976] Incomplete types are not detected at template definition time

2013-09-24 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21976 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3

[Bug pch/56549] #pragma once ineffective with BOM in include file

2013-09-24 Thread woodroof at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56549 Danil Ilinykh woodroof at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||woodroof at

[Bug pch/49837] File with UTF-8 BOM, included from pch, caused compilation error

2013-09-24 Thread woodroof at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49837 Danil Ilinykh woodroof at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED