http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58510
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58509
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58508
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55469
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
---
This bug is a bit of showstopper for doing automatic leak testing with
gperftools (essentially all our regtests have a non-zero error code with this
leak being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519
Bug ID: 58519
Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in eliminate_regs_1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58509
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se ---
(gdb) break fancy_abort
Breakpoint 2 at 0x9e4a04
(gdb) run -gnatwa -quiet -nostdinc -dumpbase g-awk.adb -auxbase-strip g-awk.o
-O2 -Wextra -Wall -fPIC -g -gnatpg -mcpu=ultrasparc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Sep 24 10:07:32 2013
New Revision: 202861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202861root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-24 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56166
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Sep 24 10:07:32 2013
New Revision: 202861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202861root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-24 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Sep 24 10:07:32 2013
New Revision: 202861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202861root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-24 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58509
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58513
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 24 11:04:04 2013
New Revision: 202865
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202865root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-09-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58513
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57134
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Sep 24 11:32:28 2013
New Revision: 202866
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202866root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/57134
PR middle-end/57586
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Sep 24 11:32:28 2013
New Revision: 202866
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202866root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/57134
PR middle-end/57586
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57134
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58518
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58509
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc-linux |sparc-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58516
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57973
caroline dyjay_love at 126 dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dyjay_love at 126 dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58516
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Maybe something like the following might fix it?
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -5199,7 +5199,9 @@ finish_transaction_stmt (tree stmt, tree compound_stmt,
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58516
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Or alternatively ...
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -5199,7 +5199,9 @@ finish_transaction_stmt (tree stmt, tree compound_stmt,
int flags, tree noex)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58520
Bug ID: 58520
Summary: GCC fails to vectorize loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58520
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58520
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30887
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30887action=edit
Assembler generated by ICC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58520
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
By the way, I think that saying which specific command line options you are
using is *much* more important than providing CPU brand and model, because the
optimizers do not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519
Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|m68k-*-*|m68k-*-* mips*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58490
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you let me know whether
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00553.html
fixes the problem?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/293919 for a possible
patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58519
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That fixed the small testcase I created, I will try a complete build next.
For the record the test case that fails with MIPS GCC (-O2 -g -mips64) is:
_vdiprintf_r(struct _reent *ptr ,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58511
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58510
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
Bug ID: 58521
Summary: [4.9 Regression] bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58441
--- Comment #5 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30888
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30888action=edit
Patch to fix the problem
The Makefile was installing the headers in the wrong place. This patch should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58441
ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58521
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I have a different boostrap failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10:
/opt/gcc/build_w/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/opt/gcc/build_w/./prev-gcc/
-B/opt/gcc/gcc4.9w/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/bin/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58441
ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130924 (experimental) [trunk revision 202859] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c
$ gcc-4.8 -O3 small.c
$ gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587
Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58522
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Johannes Schaub from comment #7)
Jonathan, unfortunately that code won't create and discard a temporary
object,
Yes, you're right, there's no temporary so it's not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I still think it would be nice to get a warning for e.g.
std::unique_lockM(m);
where M m is visible in an enclosing scope and would have been a viable
argument for another
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30689|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58522
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
Started with r199048, so sounds like one of the many dups of the reassoc
scheduling bugs.
Jakub, I think you are right. I somehow forgot to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57973
--- Comment #4 from caroline dyjay_love at 126 dot com ---
(In reply to caroline from comment #3)
Dose someone know how this bug been fixed in 4.8.2?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #39 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
*** Bug 58522 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58522
Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21976
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56549
Danil Ilinykh woodroof at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||woodroof at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49837
Danil Ilinykh woodroof at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
51 matches
Mail list logo