http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58571
Bug ID: 58571
Summary: Warning while building gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58483
--- Comment #5 from dennis luehring dl.soluz at gmx dot net ---
but clang 3.3 produces only the optimized output when using -O2 (-O3 still
invokes the loop optimizer too early - but this is a known bug)
so it seems that the llvm/clang developers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58564
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to John Regehr from comment #3)
Kai, this is a real bug, please reopen it.
Here is what I get out of -fdump-tree-original:
b = (int) (d == c a != 1);
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58571
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58562
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58562
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Specifically it fails this requirement:
matrixVectorProdTerm a(1, 0, 0);
matrixVectorProdTerm b(0, 1, 0);
assert( !(ab ba) );
i.e. with your definition of ordering two objects can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58562
--- Comment #7 from Joshua N Pritikin jpritikin at pobox dot com ---
Ah, I see. Thanks for pointing out my stupidity. :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Bug ID: 58572
Summary: [4.9 regression] make install uses -Wno-narrowing with
system compiler which does not know about it
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57719
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
The wrong-code for tests #3 and #4 (both 4.9-only regressions) was fixed by
Richard's PR58223 patch in r202096.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58571
--- Comment #2 from Ilya mirraz1 at rambler dot ru ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1)
Not a problem. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#stage1warnings
GCC is built in stages. The first stage uses the system compiler, which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58573
Bug ID: 58573
Summary: Bug box on return conditional expression with an
imported function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58536
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58548
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58561
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58574
Bug ID: 58574
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Wrong code due to s390x machine reorg
pass
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57719
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
The wrong-code for tests #1 and #2 (both 4.8/4.9 regressions) was also fixed
for 4.9 by Richard's PR58223 patch in r202096. That patch has been backported
to 4.8 branch, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58574
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094
arnaut.billings at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnaut.billings at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10901
--- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Sep 29 20:14:39 2013
New Revision: 203019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203019root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc:
PR target/10901
* config/darwin-protos.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58574
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58536
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's a GNU extension as mentioned in the ChangeLog:
2013-09-16 Adam Butcher a...@jessamine.co.uk
* cp-tree.h (type_uses_auto_or_concept): Declare.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58548
--- Comment #3 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's a GNU extension, see comment #2 in PR58536.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
--- Comment #5 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's a GNU extension, see comment #2 in PR58536.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58575
Bug ID: 58575
Summary: gcc should compile firefox code faster.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586
Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10901
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58576
Bug ID: 58576
Summary: std::regex_match() reports mismatched braces on a
valid regex
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58576
Galen G Brownsmith galens at capaccess dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30929|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56853
msharp at TxBiomed dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msharp at TxBiomed dot org
30 matches
Mail list logo
