http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de ---
Created attachment 30957
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30957action=edit
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
Bug ID: 58627
Summary: [4.9 Regression] crash during compilation of boost
testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1)
Weird that nobody noticed for so much time.
Probably not everybody is practicing the neurotic habit of checking the asm
output for every
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Some builtins are type generic, meaning that you can use just the non-{l,f}
suffixed variant always, but __builtin_signbit isn't among them.
Grep shows that these builtins have type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58603
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #5)
KDE added a trailing underscore to work around this issue.
Seems easier just to #undef m_slot for hpux in system.h.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58628
Bug ID: 58628
Summary: Incorrect std::isalpha results with UTF-8 locale on
illumos
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58628
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Pyhalov alp at rsu dot ru ---
Created attachment 30958
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30958action=edit
ctype test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
Some builtins are type generic, meaning that you can use just the non-{l,f}
suffixed variant always, but __builtin_signbit isn't among
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56993
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Can you provide a reduced test case?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58621
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56746
ofv at wanadoo dot es changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ofv at wanadoo dot es
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't think it is a good idea to extend the number of type generic builtins
unless strictly necessary, the overloading in C is quite ugly hack.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That said, I'd say that every conversion to double that would change the sign
looks wrong to me, no matter of what the rounding mode is, except perhaps for
NaN canonicalization and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58626
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Started with r202775, still occurs with today's trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58629
Bug ID: 58629
Summary: Do not implicit move instance for throw operator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Ok, thanks a lot for the comments. Thus, Oleg, given in particular the last
comment from Jakub, let's just apply to mainline your initial proposed change,
let's leave for now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58629
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Did you search bugzilla before filing the bug? I'm asking because I'm pretty
sure we already have something closely related.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4)
There's another place in file libstdc++-v3/include/c_std/cmath:
templatetypename _Tp
inline typename
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58629
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Please compare c++/57533
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57533
Dmitry dmitriy-hshg at mail dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmitriy-hshg at mail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58629
Dmitry dmitriy-hshg at mail dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
At some point, as we discussed already a bit, we should even try to remove
completely the c_std version. For now as I said, let's just leave it alone.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39968
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38711
Bug 38711 depends on bug 54961, which changed state.
Bug 54961 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr48757.f -O (internal compiler error)
after revision 192440
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54961
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54961
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58398
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
How can I set this PR to FIXED?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53756
tim blechmann tim at klingt dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim at klingt dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Ping -- there's been a patch for this bug for almost 10 months now...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630
Bug ID: 58630
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Revision 203171 breaks several MS-ABI
tests
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58631
Bug ID: 58631
Summary: Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines
re-entered.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58631
--- Comment #1 from bsamim at yahoo dot com ---
It seems this happens in the following code when the copy constructor for is
set as Card(Card ) = delete;It will crash the compiler on this as I
believe it is because the vector is expecting it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58631
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bsamim at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58632
Bug ID: 58632
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE reusing template parameter
name as class name
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58633
Bug ID: 58633
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with decltype of
destructor call
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58517
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58634
Bug ID: 58634
Summary: [c++11] ICE initializing static class member via an
anonymous class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58624
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Doesn't look like a C++ front-end issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58517
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem also happens on 4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58635
Bug ID: 58635
Summary: [c++11] ICE with __transaction_atomic and
noexcept(false)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57945
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58636
Bug ID: 58636
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with initializer_list and
rvalue references
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58527
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58517
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reichelt at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Crash stack trace:
PR58466.cc:7:11: internal compiler error: unexpected expression 'C' of kind
template_parm_index
BA'X' b;
^
0x6c40ce cxx_eval_constant_expression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58637
Bug ID: 58637
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with wrong usage of template in front of
function containing auto parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58517
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So if I understand correctly, this is what happens (sorry, reading
LIPSy RTL is still just too unnatural to me! ;-))
before ifcvt-after-combine:
r147:=(r424r178)
r190:=r423-r189
if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56060
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Bud Davis bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
works for me.
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.9.0 20131005 (experimental)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
Bug ID: 58638
Summary: libstdc++ builds as non-PIC when --with-pic is
specified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58639
Bug ID: 58639
Summary: ICE on self-referential struct member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
=release --with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131005 (experimental) [trunk revision 203223] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out
55 matches
Mail list logo
