http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59073
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
Untested patch
Which doesn't work (or is insufficient).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59100
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59105
Bug ID: 59105
Summary: -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect DW_AT_comp_dir.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #9 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 31204
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31204action=edit
Repro
Just occured to me that I forgot to attach a reprocase, so doing this now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com ---
The 'kernel' case passes a NULL pointer to qsort:
% test.i
struct relocs {
int *offset;
};
static struct relocs a;
void qsort(void *, int) __attribute__((__nonnull__));
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59101
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55353
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
Bug ID: 59106
Summary: Failure to link against static libasan
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55353
Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59085
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59101
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
Bug ID: 59107
Summary: Spurious Type specified for intrinsic function
'command_argument_count' at (1) is ignored under
-Wsurprising.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 31206
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31206action=edit
Proposed patch
Does this look sane?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59066
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Doesn't look like a front-end issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We should be building libsanitizer with -fno-rtti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #10 from Evgeniy Stepanov eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com ---
We don't intercept signal() on Android, because there is a friendly crash
handler installed by the OS, and we don't need to handle segv ourselves.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Nov 13 10:07:14 2013
New Revision: 204736
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204736root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/35998
* dwarf2out.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59108
Bug ID: 59108
Summary: ACTION='READ' is using O_CREAT
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35547
--- Comment #3 from Ian Kirkham Ian.Kirkham at brownandsticky dot net ---
-Wparentheses is potentially very useful but certainly too broad.
I agree that it would help if qualifiers could be added that split the coverage
to be able to distinguish
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com ---
The problem is caused by _NSGetEnviron() being called before libSystem is
initialized. This happens because some initialization code calls __cxa_atexit()
before
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #2)
We should be building libsanitizer with -fno-rtti
Ubsan seems to require it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
Alexey Samsonov samsonov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samsonov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
a small part of ubsan does indeed require rtti.
See ubsan/CMakeLists.txt (UBSAN_SOURCES vs UBSAN_CXX_SOURCES)
The rest of libsanitizer does not and should use -fno-rtti.
OMG, I
-uninitialized]
../../../../gcc/ada/make.adb:2519:10: note: ‘Pid’ was declared here
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.9.0 20131113 (experimental) (ia64-suse-linux) GCC error: |
| in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3826
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com ---
If I compile stack-overflow-1.c with 'clang -fsanitize=address -c', the
resulting object file can be linked into an executable with either 'clang
-fsanitize=address' or 'gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31206|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59077
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Wed Nov 13 11:55:01 2013
New Revision: 204739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204739root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-13 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch looks ok.
Please send it in a usual way and someone else (Jakub?) will need to approve
it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alexey Samsonov from comment #4)
Yeah, in LLVM/Clang we build C++-specific part of UBSan with -frtti (and
link it to C++ programs only), and the rest sanitizers with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59077
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com ---
Clang's libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib depends on the Foundation framework.
When I remove that dependency, ASanified programs crash on the same env_ptr
assertion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59109
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59102
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59100
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59097
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nlewycky at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31207|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58680
--- Comment #14 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
I hate zombie bugs. Can we either fix or wontfix this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #12)
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
[...]
If anyone is willing to test the patch on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59110
Bug ID: 59110
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE using auto in cast
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8)
The following patch seems to fix the issue:
Looks good to me.
I think it needs to get into the compiler source code somehow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59110
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59111
Bug ID: 59111
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE on invalid usage of auto
in return type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59112
Bug ID: 59112
Summary: [c++1y] ICE using auto as parameter in local class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59113
Bug ID: 59113
Summary: [c++1y] ICE using auto as parameter in local function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114
Bug ID: 59114
Summary: [c++1y] ICE using auto in conversion operator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115
Bug ID: 59115
Summary: [c++1y] ICE with auto as template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58533
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #9)
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8)
The following patch seems to fix the issue:
Looks good to me.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #8)
Clang's libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib depends on the Foundation
framework. When I remove that dependency, ASanified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com ---
This might help, but we don't actually need that dependency.
Instead libsanitizer should be updated to r194573.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59111
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #12 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com ---
That was Foundation, not sure if CoreFoundation also works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59080
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56902
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31209
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31209action=edit
hack
Btw, I also had a patch^Whack, see attached. Also further patches that didn't
get
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #10)
This might help, but we don't actually need that dependency.
Instead libsanitizer should be updated to r194573.
Okay, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59082
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Wed Nov 13 15:47:04 2013
New Revision: 204750
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204750root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-13 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59116
Bug ID: 59116
Summary: std::nth_element segfaults by invalidating one of the
vector elements
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that technically invalid C programs still may be reasonable. For
example
writing *0 = 1; and catching that via sigsetjmp/siglongjmp and a signal handler
is possible but of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59116
--- Comment #1 from chandraprakashblr at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31210
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31210action=edit
preprocessed file of sample program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59116
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58800
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chandraprakashblr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58951
Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59117
Bug ID: 59117
Summary: Is the default constructor generated by the compiler
actually called?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #8 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #7)
Is this fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204726root=gccview=rev ?
I just tried r204726 on powerpc64-linux and it's failing as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Richi,
No doubt about *0 = 1 and the like. While it's clearly undefined, I think
we've got to continue to support catching the SIGSEGV/SIGBUS from a QOI
standpoint. That's why I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Markus,
For the kernel case, note the qsort prototype and the non-null attribute. That
explicitly states that the pointer arguments must not be null. Any code which
then passes null
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59118
Bug ID: 59118
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault - with
using keyword and template parameter(s) (C++11)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #17)
For the kernel case, note the qsort prototype and the non-null attribute.
That explicitly states that the pointer arguments
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm testing a fix for the left over failures.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Yes, the glibc guys have already found real bugs that they've fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner meissner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:03:50AM +, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119
Bug ID: 59119
Summary: Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This patch seem to have fixed the last of the powerpc64-linux build failures:
Index: libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11)
This patch seem to have fixed the last of the powerpc64-linux build failures:
Index:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #13 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No objections, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59109
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ia64-*-*|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #12)
That was Foundation, not sure if CoreFoundation also works.
Linking libasan against -Wl,-framework,CoreFoundation for gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #14 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com ---
I think one of the frameworks depends on another one, please make sure to
pick the latter one if that's true.
Also add a comment denoting this is a dirty workaround.
On Nov 13,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59036
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 13 18:00:43 2013
New Revision: 204752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204752root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-13 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #14)
I think one of the frameworks depends on another one, please make sure to
pick the latter one if that's true.
Also add a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #16 from Alexander Potapenko glider at google dot com ---
I've actually removed the Foundation linkage from LLVM today.
On Nov 13, 2013 10:45 PM, howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Ah nuts.
While pondering this a bit more, I realized we have the same problem in this
code that we do in DOM. Namely that we can have references to SSA_NAMEs that
have been released
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Alexander Potapenko from comment #16)
I've actually removed the Foundation linkage from LLVM today.
Unfortunately, that is impossible to test here. A remerge of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363
Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59056
--- Comment #5 from Richard Smith richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
I thought if the partial specializations were ambiguous then these function
overloads should be too.
Yes, this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120
Bug ID: 59120
Summary: [c++11] ICE with invalid template alias
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
Bug ID: 59121
Summary: endless loop with -O2 -floop-parallelize-all
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59102
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #24 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Wed Nov 13 21:48:59 2013
New Revision: 204755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204755root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-13 Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #25 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Wed Nov 13 21:51:44 2013
New Revision: 204756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204756root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-13 Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
