http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436
Bug 59436 depends on bug 58627, which changed state.
Bug 58627 Summary: [4.9 Regression] crash during compilation of boost testsuite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436
Bug 59436 depends on bug 58627, which changed state.
Bug 58627 Summary: [4.9 Regression] crash during compilation of boost testsuite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59618
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59621
Bug ID: 59621
Summary: wrong caret / lineno for wrong ctor field initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33761
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59598
--- Comment #33 from Denis Kolesnik denis.v.koles...@safe-mail.net ---
I found where an error in my code, corrected it and till yet it functions
normally. Sorry for my misunderstanding. On alone I could not find an error in
my code. I know, that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45426
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
According to the c.l.f. discussion, the 'iargc' reference inside the function
'iargc_8' does not refer to the generic interface, but to an external function.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
The changed appeared between r185913 (2012-03-28, no error) and r186417
(2012-04-13, error).
The most suspicious commit I can see in that range
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
The most suspicious commit I can see in that range is r186318, which was
Tobias' fix for PR52729.
Indeed reverting this commit makes the error go away for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
The changed appeared between r185913 (2012-03-28, no error) and r186417
(2012-04-13, error).
Thanks for narrowing it down so sharply, Dominique.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44526
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47485
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52714
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
try_combine is called with
i1 = (insn 14 13 16 2 (set (reg/v/f:SI 34 [ stack ])
(reg/f:SI 15 %sp)) pr52714.c:9 38 {*movsi_m68k2}
(nil))
i2 = (insn 16 14 17 2 (set (cc0)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58998
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #7)
I propose the following patch:
... which regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
Bug ID: 59622
Summary: trung gcc-4.9.0:internal compiler error: verify_gimple
failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59623
Bug ID: 59623
Summary: Segmentation fault, cc1plus, relative path
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
--- Comment #1 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31536
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31536action=edit
More c-reduced (--slow)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59612
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Dec 29 17:20:50 2013
New Revision: 206237
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206237root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-12-29 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/59612
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59621
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59612
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patches of comment 1 and 2 have been applied in r206237, so that the
original problem is fixed by now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59612
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #2)
Does -fdump-fortran-optimized actually do anything?
The reason why I did not get any output from it is of course that it is only in
effect if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59618
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59620
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 59619 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59619
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||biergaizi2009
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59620
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335
PaX Team pageexec at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pageexec at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59618
--- Comment #7 from inmarket andrewh at inmarket dot com.au ---
Thank-you. Insufficient RAM.
A message to that effect from the compiler would be useful.
Thanks for your good work and for casting your eyes on the problem. It is
appreciated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59624
Bug ID: 59624
Summary: bizarre warning about 'assigned but unused parameter'
in ctor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335
--- Comment #3 from PaX Team pageexec at gmail dot com ---
small correction: tree-flow.h and tree-flow-inline.h seem to be removed however
here's an additional list of headers that i needed to copy over manually to get
some plugins to compile:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59615
--- Comment #5 from H. Peter Anvin hpa at zytor dot com ---
Please don't get hung up on the specific example; I just picked one that was
small and self-contained.
The biggest reason we can't use gcc's native bits in the kernel are items where
we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #42 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #40)
snipped
if GNU cmp is installed. compare-debug doesn't take this into account,
so if I manually run this code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #43 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #40)
Please try this on your system and tell us how you end up with
bootstrap-debug instead of none.
Hmm, sorry,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Further reduced:
markus@x4 tmp % cat test.ii
namespace {
class A {
public:
virtual int *m_fn1();
int *m_fn2() { return m_fn1(); }
};
A a;
int b = *a.m_fn2();
}
markus@x4
49 matches
Mail list logo
