[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Martin von Gagern Martin.vGagern at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug lto/59582] LTO discards symbol that defined as weak elsewhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59582 --- Comment #6 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com --- duplication of https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15323

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 --- Comment #14 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13) I see, we should just short citcuit case when caller_freq is 0. I will test patch. Any news with the patch ?

[Bug c++/58252] [4.9 Regression] ice in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58252 --- Comment #10 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #6) (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5) This seems like a frontend issue to me. Still broken in trunk dated 20131016. Still

[Bug middle-end/47735] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Unnecessary adjustments to stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47735 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- I wonder what is the point of even looking at the alignment of VAR_DECLs that are SSA_NAME_VAR of SSA_NAMEs if we're not putting those into stack. So perhaps something like: ---

[Bug fortran/59654] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de --- (In reply to janus from comment #9) Created attachment 31557 [details] reduce test case Reduced test case. Should print '1' and does so with 4.7.4, but prints '0' with 4.8 and

[Bug c++/57524] internal compiler error on dump translation unit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels

[Bug c++/59638] [c++1y] ICE with pointer to function that has auto as parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59638 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/59637] [c++11] ICE with decltype and destructor call in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59637 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/59632] ICE with erroneous loop condition after #pragma GCC ivdep

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59632 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/59631] ICE using _Cilk_spawn without -fcilkplus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59631 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/59630] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE converting the return type of a builtin function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59630 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/57524] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in timevar_start, at timevar.c:343

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57524 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug tree-optimization/59651] [4.9 Regression] Vectorizer failing to spot dependence causes incorrect code generation.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59651 --- Comment #5 from Bingfeng Mei bmei at broadcom dot com --- Created attachment 31559 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31559action=edit initial patch Hi, Tejas, vect_create_cond_for_alias_checks contains a bug in handling

[Bug fortran/59654] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31557|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/59477] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1281 with -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59477 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3

[Bug tree-optimization/59651] [4.9 Regression] Vectorizer failing to spot dependence causes incorrect code generation.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59651 --- Comment #6 from belagod at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for the patch. It fixes this particular test case regression. I've kicked off a full regression and will let you know the results soon.

[Bug pch/59436] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++200x/stdc++.cc (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436 --- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- FYI Mike's and Jakub's patch also fixes the boost testsuite issue.

[Bug fortran/59654] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/59622] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 31561 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31561action=edit gcc49-pr59622-2.patch So, do we want something like this? For incompatible return type

[Bug target/59605] [4.9 Regression] error: wrong number of branch edges after unconditional jump in bb 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59605 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/59654] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #12) - /* Make sure the vtab has been generated. */ - gfc_find_derived_vtab (derived); This line was added in r163631, which was my fix for PR 42769.

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[OOP] Broken function table |[4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP]

[Bug middle-end/59630] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE converting the return type of a builtin function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59630 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug target/50181] insn does not satisfy constraints for 481.wrf when generating profile data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50181 --- Comment #3 from wschmidt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Thanks, Steven! I have been on an extended vacation but will have a look at this shortly. Very likely this was fixed long ago and the bugzilla not cleaned up. Bill On Thu, 2013-12-26

[Bug middle-end/59569] [4.9 Regression] r206148 causes internal compiler error: in vect_create_destination_var, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:4294

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59569 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/59494] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f scan-tree-dump-times optimized vect_[^\\n]*\\+ 13

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59494 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Alternatively we should just remove that scan-tree-dump-times from the test altogether, counting additions where either lhs or rhs1 of addition has vect_ in name is quite flawed, we

[Bug middle-end/59658] New: Document -f* flags enabled by -Og

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 Bug ID: 59658 Summary: Document -f* flags enabled by -Og Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/59630] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE converting the return type of a builtin function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59630 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- One alternative could be the following (though completely untested): --- a/gcc/builtins.c +++ b/gcc/builtins.c @@ -14227,6 +14227,10 @@ fold_call_stmt (gimple stmt, bool ignore)

[Bug rtl-optimization/59649] [4.9 regression] conftest.c miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/40199] crash when using -std=gnu99, no crash without -std=gnu99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40199 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/59593] [arm big-endian] using ldrh access a immediate which stored in a memory by word

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59593 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/59659] New: large zero-initialized std::array of std::atomic compile time excessive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659 Bug ID: 59659 Summary: large zero-initialized std::array of std::atomic compile time excessive Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/41852] ICE from '-O -fmodulo-sched -fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41852 --- Comment #6 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com --- I cannot reproduce this bug. The original test case cannot be used because the gcda format is old, but I also cannot reproduce a problem using the sms-3.c test either. I just

[Bug rtl-optimization/59477] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1281 with -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59477 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Usually combiner will reject such combination on i?86/x86_64 in the fn argument hard reg setup insns because of cant_combine_insn_p, but here r8 isn't likely spilled. Also,

[Bug tree-optimization/59519] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in slpeel_update_phi_nodes_for_guard1, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:486

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59519 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 31562 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31562action=edit gcc49-pr59519.patch I wonder if this isn't just a checking issue, the two PHI nodes

[Bug rtl-optimization/59477] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1281 with -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59477 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4) Usually combiner will reject such combination on i?86/x86_64 in the fn argument hard reg setup insns because of cant_combine_insn_p, but

[Bug c++/59659] large zero-initialized std::array of std::atomic compile time excessive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659 --- Comment #1 from Casey Carter Casey at Carter dot net --- Created attachment 31563 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31563action=edit Minimal test case. Attached minimal test case. std::atomicint arr[100]; compiles

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #13) (In reply to janus from comment #12) - /* Make sure the vtab has been generated. */ - gfc_find_derived_vtab (derived); This line was added in

[Bug rtl-optimization/59477] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1281 with -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59477 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- A problem with doing this in create_log_links with a simpler tick counter might be that it would prevent any combination across most of the CALL_INSNs. Dunno how often that happens in

[Bug tree-optimization/59622] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59622 --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- So, do we want something like this? For incompatible return type or argument types punt, unless it is the __builtin_unreachable/__cxa_pure_virtual case which can be handled the same,

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Thu Jan 2 17:27:11 2014 New Revision: 206281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206281root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-01-02 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/59654

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- After r206281, the bug should be fixed on trunk. Thomas, if you have the possibility to test a current trunk build, it would be great if you could verify that the problem is gone also for your

[Bug lto/59582] LTO discards symbol that defined as weak elsewhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59582 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug c++/57471] [4.9 Regression] Bizarre error for template parameter pack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57471 --- Comment #3 from ppluzhnikov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ppluzhnikov Date: Thu Jan 2 19:29:57 2014 New Revision: 206285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206285root=gccview=rev Log: For Google b/11970432, backport r200852 to fix PR57471.

[Bug tree-optimization/59660] We fail to optimize common boolean checks pre-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/59660] New: We fail to optimize common boolean checks pre-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660 Bug ID: 59660 Summary: We fail to optimize common boolean checks pre-inlining Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #18 from tlcclt Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov --- Hello Janus, I usually just use mac port these days, but I will try this weekend to build gfortran from the current trunk. (If I fail, then I have the luxury of assigning another

[Bug c++/53822] spell out typedefs in ambiguous call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53822 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 31564 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31564action=edit patch (mostly untested) This changes the message to: error: call of overloaded 'f(NT)'

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to tlcclt from comment #18) I usually just use mac port these days Apparently MacPorts does have GCC trunk snapshots. Tbe current one is from 2013-12-29 and I think they are updated

[Bug c++/57945] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in varpool_get_node, at cgraph.h:840

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57945 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/59378] Internal compiler error when using __builtin_shuffle in a template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59378 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: glisse Date: Thu Jan 2 22:26:24 2014 New Revision: 206300 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206300root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-01-02 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr PR

[Bug c++/59378] Internal compiler error when using __builtin_shuffle in a template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59378 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59641] ICE with invalid expression in vector arithmetic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59641 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: glisse Date: Thu Jan 2 22:43:24 2014 New Revision: 206303 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206303root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-01-02 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr PR

[Bug libstdc++/59087] Issues including complex.h in C++11/1y mode because of C's complex.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: glisse Date: Thu Jan 2 22:45:56 2014 New Revision: 206304 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206304root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-01-02 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr PR

[Bug c++/59641] ICE with invalid expression in vector arithmetic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59641 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/59087] Issues including complex.h in C++11/1y mode because of C's complex.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087 --- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- It seems to me that this is ok now. * If you want complex, include that, not complex.h * complex.h contains the C stuff for compatibility with C code, C code doesn't include ccomplex,

[Bug c++/53822] spell out typedefs in ambiguous call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53822 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4) Created attachment 31564 [details] patch (mostly untested) This changes the message to: error: call of overloaded 'f(NT)' {aka

[Bug c++/53822] spell out typedefs in ambiguous call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53822 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5) (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4) There is code in error.c:type_to_string to print {aka . It does some tricks to avoid

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note, this fix had PR59362 as follow-up.

[Bug fortran/59654] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Broken function table with complex OO use case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #20 from Damian Rouson rouson at stanford dot edu --- FYI, the current port of gcc49 via macports is broken (https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41964) so I think Tom’s only choice will be to build from source or build on another platform

[Bug c/59661] New: documentation: __builtin_FUNCTION / _FILE listed as returning int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59661 Bug ID: 59661 Summary: documentation: __builtin_FUNCTION / _FILE listed as returning int Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c/59661] documentation: __builtin_FUNCTION / _FILE listed as returning int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59661 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation

[Bug tree-optimization/59519] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in slpeel_update_phi_nodes_for_guard1, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:486

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59519 --- Comment #7 from bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) Created attachment 31562 [details] gcc49-pr59519.patch I wonder if this isn't just a checking issue, the two PHI nodes created in

[Bug c++/58950] [4.9 Regression] Missing statement has no effect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/59044] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Internal compiler error triggers when accessing a typedef in a specialized member class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59044 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58965] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member initializer in static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/58856] [4.9 Regression] spurious 'wrong number of template arguments' error for template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58856 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug other/59661] documentation: __builtin_FUNCTION / _FILE listed as returning int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59661 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at