http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59801
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Those two cases are different, the other PR was about automatic volatile
variables, where if they are unused it is really hard to come up with a way how
they could be modified behind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59830
--- Comment #2 from b17c0de at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
future relies on mutexes and condition variables so you need to compile
and link with -pthread
Thanks! That was indeed the problem. Whats with the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59775
--- Comment #13 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
I have to keep LTO still off for Libreoffice. (And for many of simple programs
that do the test for endian type the way not counting with LTO and for some
that linker is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58992
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
Bug ID: 59839
Summary: i686 AVX2 gather intrinsic not compiling with -O0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59838
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58602
--- Comment #5 from Laurent Aflonsi laurent.alfonsi at st dot com ---
Ping ?
Is this ok for trunk ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58602
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59827
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jan 16 11:42:56 2014
New Revision: 206660
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206660root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59827
* cgraph.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59543
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31527|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59830
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.9.0
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31852
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31852action=edit
gcc49-pr57763.patch
Untested fix.
So, from what I can understand, the really computed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865
--- Comment #26 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Jan 16 12:17:48 2014
New Revision: 206661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206661root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/28865
* varasm.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57180
Bug 57180 depends on bug 28865, which changed state.
Bug 28865 Summary: Structures with a flexible arrray member have wrong .size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865
Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763
--- Comment #19 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
Attached is an attempt to fix this just by setting JUMP_LABEL on the
indirect jump, then computed_jump_p predicate will be false and the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59840
Bug ID: 59840
Summary: -Wconversion produces incorrect warning when value is
shifted by 0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59841
Bug ID: 59841
Summary: [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa
failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59827
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jan 16 12:59:36 2014
New Revision: 206662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206662root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59827
* gimple-low.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #39 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 16 13:48:51 2014
New Revision: 206663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206663root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
--- Comment #14 from Barry Tannenbaum barry.m.tannenbaum at intel dot com ---
The original author of the code is no longer working on the Cilk project, so I
can't say why it's using sched_getaffinity + gettid instead the pthread
routine. But I'll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The reporter of PR57298 supposedly has or had, I don't.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59841
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58344
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59841
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59831
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59834
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59828
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
Bug ID: 59842
Summary: `__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx' referenced in section `.text':
defined in discarded section…
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
--- Comment #2 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org ---
Created attachment 31857
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31857action=edit
symbols file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Bug ID: 59843
Summary: ICE with return of generic vector on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
--- Comment #1 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org ---
Created attachment 31856
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31856action=edit
preprocessed source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i486-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59827
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59827
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jan 16 14:59:46 2014
New Revision: 206665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206665root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59827
* gimple-low.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58139
--- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Jan 16 14:57:00 2014
New Revision: 206664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206664root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-01-15 Uros
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
--- Comment #16 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com ---
Hi Jakub,
Honestly, I don't know why the changes were done in aclocal.m4. I added the
change to configure.ac and then did the following commands:
autoreconf --force --verbose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
Bug ID: 59844
Summary: Powerpc64le cannot bootstrap with -O3/-mcpu=power8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, with -O2 -mavx512f -march=k8 it actually hangs. So the short testcase is
enough to reproduce it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31858
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31858action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
Patch tested by Bill Schmitd, and passes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #19 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jan 16 16:23:54 2014
New Revision: 20
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=20root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
Diagnose frame_pointer_required vs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
If there's an interest, I could probably create a kickstart for a RHL8 VM
suitable for building GCC 4.9. But it's a 10+ year old platform of marginal
value at best.
I'd be much more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #20 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jan 16 16:33:30 2014
New Revision: 206667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206667root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
Diagnose frame_pointer_required vs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59820
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think you're right. I'm preparing a patch for glibc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #40 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On the full testcase tree LIM uses too much memory (I didn't merge some of
the patches that only benefit this kind of testcase ... bah). Without LIM
we use around 1GB of memory at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jan 16 17:08:52 2014
New Revision: 206668
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206668root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Michael Meissner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
While I agree with that, for _builtin_{LINE,FILE,FUNCTION} (), those were added
specifically for the use in default arguments and were I think from the start
meant to give you the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Untested patch for kunpckhi:
2014-01-16 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* config/i386/i386.md (kunpckhi): Add GPR alternative.
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj2014-01-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58602
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Yufeng Zhang yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux |aarch64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59844
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jan 16 17:35:41 2014
New Revision: 206670
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206670root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Michael Meissner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59780
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu Jan 16 17:35:50 2014
New Revision: 206671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206671root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59780
* aarch64.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59780
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
--- Comment #5 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org ---
Hm, unsure. These versioning scripts are pretty much recent GNU stuff. But if
you have input…
cvs -d _anon...@anoncvs.mirbsd.org:/cvs co -PA -d xchat-randex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3)
I think gimplify_arg clobbering a valid EXPR_LOCATION is wrong; both cases
should give the location of the default argument definition.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46507
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I agree we want to do as much as possible in FE.
ODR decisions are basically done in frontend now - we basically use mangling of
virtual tables given to us by C++ FE. Eventually we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59842
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thorsten Glaser from comment #5)
Hm, unsure. These versioning scripts are pretty much recent GNU stuff.
Recent as in the last 10 years maybe. But not in the last 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59845
Bug ID: 59845
Summary: loop optimization problem when profiling
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59846
Bug ID: 59846
Summary: Imprecise column number for -Wtype-limits
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
While I agree with that, for _builtin_{LINE,FILE,FUNCTION} (), those were
added specifically for the use in default arguments and were I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59831
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59847
Bug ID: 59847
Summary: cast to long makes compiler crash if using option
pdp-11/10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:04:08 2014
New Revision: 206676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206676root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59845
--- Comment #1 from ArshaGCC arshamidi at gmail dot com ---
I found that only when I use very high vales for input the problem persists.
for example when using 123456 as input for profiling it generates incorrect
code but when using 12345 as input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:14:49 2014
New Revision: 206678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206678root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59387
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:15:46 2014
New Revision: 206679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206679root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
* gcc.target/i386/pr9771-1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59845
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(constant folding problem within loop?)
No it is doing the following:
if (n=1)
{
i = 1;
while (true)
{
if (n%i == 0)
{
printf(\n%d, i);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:20:50 2014
New Revision: 206680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206680root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
* gcc.target/i386/pr9771-1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59609
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:13:54 2014
New Revision: 206677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206677root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-01-16 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:22:08 2014
New Revision: 206681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206681root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/54694
* gcc.target/i386/pr9771-1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:24:07 2014
New Revision: 206682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206682root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59839
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:26:08 2014
New Revision: 206683
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206683root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59839
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:27:28 2014
New Revision: 206684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206684root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/59839
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59839
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
Of course, no real performance testing has been performed, perhaps there
should be one ? or more for the =Q, Q, 0 alternative. Without any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59835
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59609
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59490
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58344
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:54:23 2014
New Revision: 206685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206685root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58344
* expr.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 16 19:55:12 2014
New Revision: 206686
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206686root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/59821
* tree.c (bot_manip): Update the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59821
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
