[Bug c/59939] No warning on signedness changes caused by implicit conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59939 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/59913] [4.9 Regresion] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabihf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913 Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at

[Bug c/59939] No warning on signedness changes caused by implicit conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59939 --- Comment #3 from Chengnian Sun chengniansun at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) IIRC this was done so that code which uses macros and have conditional code like: MACRO1 || fn1(a, b) Sorry, I do not understand.

[Bug target/59929] [4.8/4.9 regression] -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args doesn't work with x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59929 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Jan 25 03:20:44 2014 New Revision: 207070 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207070root=gccview=rev Log: Get stack adjustment from push operand in pushsf

[Bug c/59939] No warning on signedness changes caused by implicit conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59939 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #3) (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) IIRC this was done so that code which uses macros and have conditional code like:

[Bug target/59929] [4.8/4.9 regression] -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args doesn't work with x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59929 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/59939] No warning on signedness changes caused by implicit conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59939 --- Comment #5 from Chengnian Sun chengniansun at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) (In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #3) (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) IIRC this was done so that code which

[Bug c/59939] No warning on signedness changes caused by implicit conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59939 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #5) (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) (In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #3) (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)

[Bug c/59940] New: Imprecise column number for -Wconversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59940 Bug ID: 59940 Summary: Imprecise column number for -Wconversion Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug bootstrap/59934] Bootstrap fail since r206941: expmed.h:252:33: error: array subscript is above array bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59934 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/22553] [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] ICE building libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/59939] No warning on signedness changes caused by implicit conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59939 --- Comment #7 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Andrew, this actually feels to me more like a static type checking issue, i.e., whether the code is dead or not isn't all that relevant here. The important thing is that the function fn1

[Bug middle-end/40154] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:681

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40154 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

<    1   2