[Bug c++/60189] ICE with invalid use of _Cilk_sync

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60189 Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at

[Bug c++/60082] Certain Cilk keywords executable Hanging for -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60082 Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at

[Bug tree-optimization/60382] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4352)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 4 08:47:55 2014 New Revision: 208305 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208305root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-03-04 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug lto/60150] [4.9 Regression] ICE in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:1000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60150 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com --- Ok, but there is no «#define XXX» before «#include pr60150.H» in pr60150_0.C, which does not seem to be correct.

[Bug fortran/58880] [4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE on valid with FINAL function and type extension

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58880 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/60189] ICE with invalid use of _Cilk_sync

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60189 --- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Ah, g++ gives the ICE :(

[Bug libstdc++/60407] New: call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 Bug ID: 60407 Summary: call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug lto/60405] ICE in lto1 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60405 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/60404] [4.9 Regression] wrong code by LTO on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug lto/60404] wrong code by LTO on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/60407] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- This sounds like you are including math.h and then later on cmath. I don't know if this is a valid thing to do.

[Bug libstdc++/60407] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- But I cannot reproduce it with what I thought it was, please provide the preprocessed source.

[Bug libstdc++/60407] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug target/58595] internal compiler error: in gen_movsi when compiling on arm some files of lttng-tools with -fPIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #9) (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) Created attachment 32254 [details] gcc49-pr58595-2.patch So what about this variant? I'll give

[Bug libstdc++/60407] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 Dilawar Singh dilawar.s.rajput at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug libstdc++/60407] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 --- Comment #5 from Dilawar Singh dilawar.s.rajput at gmail dot com --- Hi, Added the *.ii file and g++ -v output. Since one file was large, links are given. (In reply to Dilawar Singh from comment #4) g++ info can be found here

[Bug lto/60404] [4.9 Regression] wrong code by LTO on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/60376] [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE using member function in a template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Mar 4 10:52:18 2014 New Revision: 208309 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208309root=gccview=rev Log: /gcc/cp 2014-03-04 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/60376] [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE on invalid with using declaration in template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60376 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |

[Bug target/60408] New: ARM: inefficient code for vget_lane_f32 intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60408 Bug ID: 60408 Summary: ARM: inefficient code for vget_lane_f32 intrinsic Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/58511] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE using static const member variable in constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58511 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/60382] [4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4352)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/60382] [4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4352)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60382 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 4 11:02:47 2014 New Revision: 208310 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208310root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-03-04 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug c++/58511] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE using static const member variable in constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58511 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug c++/60389] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with inheriting constructors and wrong usage of constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60389 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- If you include stdlib.h and not cstdlib it's a glibc bug, not a gcc/libstdc++ one.

[Bug libstdc++/60407] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/60407] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/60407] [C++11call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|call of overloaded ‘isnan’ |[C++11call of

[Bug c++/60409] New: [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE on valid with template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60409 Bug ID: 60409 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE on valid with template function Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/60409] [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE on valid with template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60409 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug testsuite/59308] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ifcombine-ccmp-[1456] tests fail on arm cortex-a5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment

[Bug c++/60367] Default argument object is not getting constructed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/59713] unordered_map constructor / destructor / move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59713 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/60367] Default argument object is not getting constructed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/60407] [C++11] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 --- Comment #9 from Dilawar Singh dilawar.s.rajput at gmail dot com --- The snippet I sent you (in url filed) is a part of large project which compiles fine on Ubuntu-server (gcc4.7.x, I am not sure about x). I will confirm it later once I login

[Bug testsuite/59308] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ifcombine-ccmp-[1456] tests fail on arm cortex-a5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59308 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32258 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32258action=edit gcc49-pr59308.patch Patch (only tested on x86_64-linux with

[Bug c/60410] New: -fshort-double ICEs x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410 Bug ID: 60410 Summary: -fshort-double ICEs x86_64 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug lto/60405] ICE in lto1 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60405 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 4 11:25:50 2014 New Revision: 208311 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208311root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-03-04 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug target/60408] ARM: inefficient code for vget_lane_f32 intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60408 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/55608] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Debug info quality regressions with file scope vars

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55608 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/54392] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::string::assign() fails to update length

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- So 5.0 material, given that we are not going to change std::string in 4.9?

[Bug lto/55113] ICE with LTO and -fshort-double

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113 pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/54392] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::string::assign() fails to update length

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, definitely. It should get fixed automatically by switching to the new std::string impl.

[Bug target/60410] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] -fshort-double ICEs x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/60410] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] -fshort-double ICEs x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yep. r189974. Looks like the target is confused by building a -fshort-double V2DF with using double_type_node. Probably broken also on i?86, just not triggered. OTOH,

[Bug middle-end/60226] ICE initializing array of elements with too large alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60226 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/58595] internal compiler error: in gen_movsi when compiling on arm some files of lttng-tools with -fPIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32252|0 |1 is

[Bug target/57295] target c6x-elf // internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57295 --- Comment #2 from Wojciech Migda wojtek.golf at interia dot pl --- Created attachment 32261 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32261action=edit Proposed patch Analysis of the reported problem has shown that expanding movmisalign

[Bug libstdc++/60407] [C++11] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 --- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like a dup of PR 48891.

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #13 from PaX Team pageexec at gmail dot com --- another missing include in trunk: tree-cfgcleanup.h (it seems that it was split from tree-flow.h which used to be installed for plugins for gcc 4.5-4.8).

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (dup of PR 33935) (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) If you include stdlib.h and not cstdlib it's a glibc bug, not a gcc/libstdc++ one. It would make sense for libstdc++

[Bug ada/60411] New: ADA canadian cross build fails.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 Bug ID: 60411 Summary: ADA canadian cross build fails. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug c/60412] New: superfluous arithmetic generated for uneven tail handling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60412 Bug ID: 60412 Summary: superfluous arithmetic generated for uneven tail handling Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/60413] New: extra precision not properly removed on assignment of return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413 Bug ID: 60413 Summary: extra precision not properly removed on assignment of return value Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/60413] extra precision not properly removed on assignment of return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/60413] extra precision not properly removed on assignment of return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Lortie desrt at desrt dot ca --- Why is this violation of standards treated in a special way? Quoting from gcc's manpage: -ffast-math Sets -fno-math-errno, -funsafe-math-optimizations,

[Bug c/60413] extra precision not properly removed on assignment of return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Ryan Lortie from comment #2) Why is this violation of standards treated in a special way? Because it slows down things way too much. Much better is just to use -msse2

[Bug fortran/60414] New: internal compiler error: tree check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60414 Bug ID: 60414 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c/60413] extra precision not properly removed on assignment of return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413 --- Comment #4 from Ryan Lortie desrt at desrt dot ca --- It seems like a good solution to this problem might be to enable -mfpmath=sse by default on arches where SSE is known to be supported and -fexcess-precision=standard otherwise. If people

[Bug c/60413] extra precision not properly removed on assignment of return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60413 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- I think this is another duplicate of pr323.

[Bug c++/60415] [4.9 regression] Bogus invalid use of qualified-name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/60415] New: [4.9 regression] Bogus invalid use of qualified-name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415 Bug ID: 60415 Summary: [4.9 regression] Bogus invalid use of qualified-name Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/60414] internal compiler error: tree check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60414 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/60415] [4.9 regression] Bogus invalid use of qualified-name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=196765

[Bug ada/60411] ADA canadian cross build fails.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux

[Bug libstdc++/60407] [C++11] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like a dup of PR 48891. See also the comments for PR 54130.

[Bug libstdc++/60407] [C++11] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 --- Comment #12 from Dilawar Singh dilawar.s.rajput at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #10) Looks like a dup of PR 48891. Yes. It is very similar to this. Fine with me if it is marked dup. I was mistaken about gcc

[Bug c++/60416] New: [4.9 Regression] aggregate init will not use explicit default constructors for members with no initializer-clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60416 Bug ID: 60416 Summary: [4.9 Regression] aggregate init will not use explicit default constructors for members with no initializer-clause Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/58595] internal compiler error: in gen_movsi when compiling on arm some files of lttng-tools with -fPIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595 --- Comment #12 from Meador Inge meadori at codesourcery dot com --- The latest patch LGTM. I don't currently have ARM hardware setup for a bootstrap, but I did run all the GCC and GLIBC tests for the default options and -mthumb via QEMU. I saw

[Bug c++/60417] New: [4.9 regression] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417 Bug ID: 60417 Summary: [4.9 regression] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/60417] [4.9 regression] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/60417] [4.9 regression] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot

[Bug c++/60416] [4.9 Regression] aggregate init will not use explicit default constructors for members with no initializer-clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60416 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/60416] [4.9 Regression] aggregate init will not use explicit default constructors for members with no initializer-clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60416 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com --- I agree that this is unwanted, but I can deduce astonishing little information what the standard requires here. For copy/move operations we have at least 12.3.1 p3 saying

[Bug c++/59760] use_thunk internal error on default destructor declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59760 gaba gaba at freemail dot hu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gaba at freemail dot hu

[Bug target/57754] Loongson 3A is MIPS64R2-compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57754 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug lto/60404] [4.9 Regression] wrong code by LTO on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60404 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Compiling with optimization and linking without it in LTO mode is one of the most clever ideas I have seen recently so I agree that a kludge is good enough...

[Bug c++/54359] [C++0x] decltype in member function's trailing return type when defined outside of class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54359 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 4 22:16:03 2014 New Revision: 208332 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208332root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/60415 PR c++/54359 * parser.c

[Bug c++/60417] [4.9 regression] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 4 22:16:12 2014 New Revision: 208333 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208333root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/60417 * typeck2.c

[Bug c++/60415] [4.9 regression] Bogus invalid use of qualified-name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 4 22:16:03 2014 New Revision: 208332 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208332root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/60415 PR c++/54359 * parser.c

[Bug middle-end/60418] New: [4.9 Regression] 435.gromacs in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60418 Bug ID: 60418 Summary: [4.9 Regression] 435.gromacs in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/60419] New: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419 Bug ID: 60419 Summary: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/60418] [4.9 Regression] 435.gromacs in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60418 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Do we need to verify that basic block DEST has a single predecessor? This patch works for me: diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c b/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c index 926d300..0ed15df 100644 ---

[Bug c++/60420] New: [C++11] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 Bug ID: 60420 Summary: [C++11] Bogus error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int’ with lambda Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/60419] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419 Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at

[Bug middle-end/60419] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- yes, the first attachment is for powepc64le-linux-gnu

[Bug c++/60415] [4.9 regression] Bogus invalid use of qualified-name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60415 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/60417] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/60417] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com --- I have submitted a request to the core group for clarification, but personally I believe that the intention is clearly to never implicitly-declare an explicit default

[Bug debug/60381] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at var-tracking.c:8245

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381 Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED