http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59776
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 07:59:29 2014
New Revision: 208366
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208366root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-02-11 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52370
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 08:00:49 2014
New Revision: 208367
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208367root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-02-11 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60101
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 08:01:57 2014
New Revision: 208368
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208368root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-02-12 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43546
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 08:02:46 2014
New Revision: 208369
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208369root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-02-13 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58844
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 08:10:08 2014
New Revision: 208370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208370root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-02-19 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37743
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 08:11:20 2014
New Revision: 208371
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208371root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-02-19 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56490
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 08:12:02 2014
New Revision: 208372
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208372root=gccview=rev
Log:
* Makefile.in (tree-ssa-uninit.o): Depend on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60276
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 08:23:36 2014
New Revision: 208373
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208373root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/60276
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60026
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59776
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58844
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60434
--- Comment #2 from Egor Suvorov egor_suvorov at mail dot ru ---
Created attachment 32283
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32283action=edit
Output of gcc with '-v -save-temps -std=c++11 -Wformat'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60441
Bug ID: 60441
Summary: Incorrect textual representation for
std::mersenne_twister_engine
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60434
--- Comment #3 from Egor Suvorov egor_suvorov at mail dot ru ---
Yes, here is result both with C++03 and with C++11 (they're absolutely the
same):
a.cpp: In function 'int main()':
a.cpp:5:19: warning: format '%f' expects argument of type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59339
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
Bug ID: 60442
Summary: No -Wparentheses warning for if (a += b)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ASAN:SIGSEGV
=
==20669==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0018 (pc
0x023044cf sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Strange, can't reproduce this myself using the same options, neither in
bootstrapped cc1, nor in non-bootstrapped -O0 built, nor bootstrapped cc1 under
valgrind, both 4.8 (older and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60443
Bug ID: 60443
Summary: Target specific options that change the ABI should be
marked
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #7 from Nistor, Mihail-Marian m_nistor at yahoo dot com ---
Hello,
Doe to the fact that the gcc is not compatible with the DWARF and PPC ABI for
the PPC processors, as you said that is a fact of life and we need to live with
it. Users
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
Nistor, Mihail-Marian m_nistor at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60435
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can't verify it as there isn't a compilable testcase. But I guess this is
just because GCC doesn't have a code hoisting pass, not because of
int vs. long. See PR23286 of which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60444
Bug ID: 60444
Summary: No -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60429
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
Bug ID: 60445
Summary: [4.9 Regression] 473.astar miscompares with -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
markus@x4 tmp % gdb --args /var/tmp/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/g++
-DTABLES_NEXT_TO_CODE -x assembler-with-cpp -c ghc3240_8.s
Reading symbols from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 6 11:19:13 2014
New Revision: 208379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208379root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-06 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 6 11:19:13 2014
New Revision: 208379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208379root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-06 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, the -flto fails I can reproduce locally and are caused by r208312 (now
reverted). Still trying to reproduce with plain -Ofast as seen on one of
the testers...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 6 11:19:13 2014
New Revision: 208379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208379root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-06 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Bug 60424 depends on bug 60427, which changed state.
Bug 60427 Summary: [4.9 Regression] r208312 causes ICE and wrong code for
Fortran with -flto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59339
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60431
Wojciech Migda wojtek.golf at interia dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 12:07:07 2014
New Revision: 208380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208380root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/58595
* config/arm/arm.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60446
Bug ID: 60446
Summary: [PATCH] [TIC6X] implementing abssf2/absdf2 insns,
_fabs/_fabsf/__builtin_c6x_fabs/__builtin_c6x_fabsf
intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60446
--- Comment #1 from Wojciech Migda wojtek.golf at interia dot pl ---
Created attachment 32284
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32284action=edit
Proposed patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59339
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Mar 6 12:24:11 2014
New Revision: 208381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208381root=gccview=rev
Log:
Don't install vtv_*.o unless --enable-vtable-verify (PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59339
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #10 from Nistor, Mihail-Marian m_nistor at yahoo dot com ---
Could you please show me where this information is in the GNU ABI?
My request is to add all exceptions from the standards to release note.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
But what exceptions are you talking about? I believe for .dwarf_frame PPC now
emits the psABI mandated register numbers, and .eh_frame, being a GCC
invention, simply has different
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
Bug ID: 60447
Summary: Empty .s file created when using -E flag
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60236
Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60197
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Mar 6 13:41:46 2014
New Revision: 208382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208382root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/60197
c-family/
* cilk.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60197
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
Bug ID: 60448
Summary: swap_ranges does not use ADL correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Fuka vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com ---
-o option for what?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #1 from Alisdair Meredith public at alisdairm dot net ---
Created attachment 32287
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32287action=edit
Cleaner tagging scheme for the local class
Simplified the example to more directly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
when I revert this check-inm the build-succeeds:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=208150
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Adding -nostdinc is a simple workaround.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
--- Comment #7 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com ---
Hi all,
I'd really love to have some feedback on this issue. It looks like nobody is
having a look at this.
Thanks for all the good work, and sorry for insisting.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Fuka vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com ---
I see, but I just wanted to print the content or pipe it somewhere, so I don't
think that resolves it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 02:45:38PM +, vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com wrote:
I see, but I just wanted to print the content or pipe it somewhere, so I don't
think
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alisdair Meredith from comment #1)
Created attachment 32287 [details]
Cleaner tagging scheme for the local class
Simplified the example to more directly expose the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't understand what we can be doing wrong in the library, we just call
std::iter_swap(it1, it2) which calls swap(*it1, *it2) unqualified.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32288
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32288action=edit
gcc49-pr58572.patch
That didn't work for some reason (tried that just manually, after make
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like the difference between libc++ and libstdc++ is whether std::swap()
is declared before std::swap_ranges or not, this reproduces the same behaviour,
with swapper replacing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60384
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Slightly different version of that last test:
namespace tagged
{
template typename T
struct Swappable {};
#ifndef NO_CUSTOM_SWAP
template typename T
void swap(SwappableT a,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
libc++ sfinae constrains std::swap.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #6)
libc++ sfinae constrains std::swap.
More precisely: they do have swap declared before iter_swap, if you remove the
=delete it is ambiguous
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
Bug ID: 60449
Summary: Merging function DECLs discards leaf attribute which
causes cfg verifier to fail
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32289
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32289action=edit
Part one of a testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32290
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32290action=edit
Part two of a testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:01:52PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
--- Comment #5 from Steve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #200 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I currently cannot build Firefox with LTO due to PR 60449 (yeah, I
know, using gcc configured with checking makes life hard, sometimes
unnecessarily).
I get errors like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #201 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With current gcc trunk and mozilla-central trunk Firefox crashes on startup
when
build with -flto (--enable-optimize=-O3):
0x75ce5d8f in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #8 from Alisdair Meredith public at alisdairm dot net ---
I agree with Mark's analysis. I was trying to force use of swap on a local
class, and found a pattern that worked for libc++ but missed that neither
template would be more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32291
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32291action=edit
Untested proposed fix
Untested proposed fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #202 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
LTO miscompiles 435.gromacs in SPEC CPU 2006 on x32 with
-mx32 -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math
since r208165 (PR 60418). Can you try r208163?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
Implicit preincludes should probably be disabled when preprocessing .S
files (though I don't know if that would help with this issue).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #1)
: g++-4.8.2 for 'void f(int r) {}' produces
DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type.
Or do you mean something else?
ref qualifiers is a term from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60418
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
One pass removes a preheader in
if (_47 0)
goto bb 3;
else
goto bb 8;
bb 3:
bb 4:
# n_20 = PHI 1(3), n_269(7)
and becomes:
if (_47 0)
goto bb 3;
else
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60429
--- Comment #6 from Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
Can you identify the inlined call? Is it
if (pSLL y == pSLL-scanline) {
loadAET(AET,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #203 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #202)
LTO miscompiles 435.gromacs in SPEC CPU 2006 on x32 with
-mx32 -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math
since r208165 (PR 60418). Can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #12 from Nistor, Mihail-Marian m_nistor at yahoo dot com ---
The ppc gcc uses the DWARF register number mapping that is defined by the
psABI, but the main problem is: the psABI is for AI32/64 architectures. The
DWARF register number
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
--- Comment #3 from Chengnian Sun chengniansun at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
I'm not convinced there is anything wrong. The reason to warn about if(a =
b) or if(a = a + b) is that way too often people just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
