http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589
--- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
BTW could someone add libcilkrts to list of components?
What do you mean by this?
No-no, I meant a bugzilla component so that I could
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 06:53:01 2014
New Revision: 208693
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208693root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-19 Tobias Burnus burnus@net-b.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56910
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21857
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21664
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
Probably the right choice is to simply revert r208440.
Unrelated to the revert: GCC currently installs cilk (and also ssp) under both
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18079
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18079
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60553
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Slightly more reduced testcase:
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr60419.C2014-03-19 15:57:57.735114622 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr60419.C2014-03-20 10:20:56.245365852
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #13)
The problem with both pasted testcases is that they don't crash 4.7.4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem with both pasted testcases is that they don't crash 4.7.4.
The attached one does.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Bug ID: 60597
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_refs_verify, at
df-scan.c:4323
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, what about (crashes trunk and 4.8.3) :
class J
{
public:
J ();
virtual void m_fn1 (int p1, int);
};
template class TDATA class D
{
public:
virtual void m_fn1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
Bug ID: 60598
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2239
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32402
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32402action=edit
autoreduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reproducible with a cross from x86_64 to s390x-linux and
./cc1 -fpreprocessed camellia-set-decrypt-key.i -quiet -march=z196 -mtune=zEC12
-m64 -O2 -fpic
camellia-set-decrypt-key.c:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have:
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr60419.C2014-03-19 15:57:57.735114622 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr60419.C2014-03-20 11:13:58.933256068 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60599
Bug ID: 60599
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Testsuite's scan-module-absence no
longer works
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, but that one has undefined behavior in it (uninitialized i and j).
This one doesn't - -g -O2 -m32 again:
struct A
{
int foo () const;
int bar () const;
int a;
};
struct B
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60577
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32403
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32403action=edit
alternative patch
This restores previous behavior by considering all coverage/profile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
What we should do is break the test case into two test cases one for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60600
Bug ID: 60600
Summary: ICE in ipa_get_indirect_edge_target_1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60580
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm not going to hack on this any time soon, so if aarch64 maintainers could
take it over, it would be appreciated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60600
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
/sem_dim.adb:1649:8: error: fallthru
edge crosses section boundary in bb 40
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.9.0 20140320 (experimental) [trunk revision 161655]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error:|
| verify_flow_info failed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60601
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Created attachment 32405
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32405action=edit
preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Created attachment 32406
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32406action=edit
asm compiled with -std=gnu++11 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Created attachment 32407
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32407action=edit
asm compiled with -std=gnu++11 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Well - when I build the test -O0,O1,Os it passes.
Confirmed when running the test suite. However the following reduced test
/* { dg-do run { target hppa*-*-hpux* *-*-linux*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #3 from Yufeng Zhang yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This issue is related to the handling of vector of one double in the AArch64
backend. We don't have a corresponding type defined in ACLE (ARM C Language
Extension) the spec and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602
Bug ID: 60602
Summary: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr28865.c FAILs on Solaris
9/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32408
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32408action=edit
assembler input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems this is because invalid RTL sharing, debugging.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Is the following patch better?
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f902014-03-08
10:02:08.0 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Is the following patch better?
It was a bit confusing at first glimpse, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
It was a bit confusing at first glimpse, but fine.
???
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18079
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch queued for 5.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01068.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
It was a bit confusing at first glimpse, but fine.
???
I ran the test on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60596
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:25:16AM +, patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr
wrote:
Ok so if I understand well, for gfortran once the input_unit
is closed, the unit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60599
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 16:05:41 2014
New Revision: 208706
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208706root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/60568
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 16:10:33 2014
New Revision: 208707
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208707root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/60568
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60556
Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Trunk patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01078.html
4.8 will need some slightly modified variant, I'm still looking for the best
place
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 16:34:32 2014
New Revision: 208717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208717root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/60568
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60596
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60603
Bug ID: 60603
Summary: .debug_macinfo has wrong line numbers for built-in
macros
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60603
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60604
Bug ID: 60604
Summary: GCC incorrectly compiles s_csinh function on MIPS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60528
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have created a new bug for the incorrect csinh results and included a cutdown
test case. It looks like a GCC optimization bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60604
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I ran the test on Solaris 9 and 11 and looked at the resulting .sum
files. Seeing the Unsupported rounding entries on Solaris 11 (any
platform without the rounding issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32411
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32411action=edit
proposed patch
This appears to fix the bug.
This code has a distinctly weird look to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This patch appears not to have been posted on gcc-patches which is required for
all checkins, and none of the bugzillas seem to say who approved it. I noticed
it because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #12 from Jon Beniston jon at beniston dot com ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #11)
This patch appears not to have been posted on gcc-patches which is required
for all checkins, and none of the bugzillas seem to say who
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60567
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The gcc/configure check has the following comment:
# Require GNU ld or gold 2.21+ for plugin support by default.
# Allow -fuse-linker-plugin to enable plugin support in GNU
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58622
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55906
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:42:00 2014
New Revision: 208732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208732root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60283
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:42:15 2014
New Revision: 208733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208733root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60283
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:42:00 2014
New Revision: 208732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208732root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:42:15 2014
New Revision: 208733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208733root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
Yufeng Zhang yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60572
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:45:09 2014
New Revision: 208734
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208734root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60572
* init.c (build_zero_init_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60283
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:47:09 2014
New Revision: 208735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208735root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/60597
* ira.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53793
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53246
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 19:50:51 2014
New Revision: 208736
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208736root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #13 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
-m32 compiled fine but 64 bit gave me (rev. 208729):
/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -flto=4 -fuse-linker-plugin -O2 -ggdb -pipe
-march=core2 -mtune=core2 -flto=4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60572
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Definitely unrelated, please file a different bug, and if at all possible try
to reduce it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56775
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60598
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32411|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56963
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57715
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60568
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #53 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #41)
markus@x4 tmp % g++ -flto -c -O2 test.ii nm test.o | grep
_ZN8Calligra6Sheets5qHashERKNS0_10ConditionsE
U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60574
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59295
--- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com ---
Still broken in current head (r208736).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60605
Bug ID: 60605
Summary: incorrect diagosis of default template argument for
function declaration inside class template member
function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
sadly, this seems to be a ld64 bug - present when using uncompressed EH (which
is the default for GCC on darwin).
If I manually enable compressed EH (which is the default now for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60599
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 20 23:16:57 2014
New Revision: 208739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208739root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-21 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60599
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60580
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
