http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60663
Bug ID: 60663
Summary: Errors out on valid inline asm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58489
--- Comment #2 from Timo Teräs timo.teras at iki dot fi ---
I got this fixed. It seems genautomata does not work properly if it is built
with -fPIC. Since PIE/PIC get added automatically in alpine toolchain it caused
this.
For now I'm adding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Mar 26 06:46:27 2014
New Revision: 208834
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208834root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR other/59545
* ira-color.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39525
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Mar 26 06:55:39 2014
New Revision: 208835
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208835root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/39525
* doc/extend.texi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37428
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Mar 26 06:58:15 2014
New Revision: 208836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208836root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/37428
* doc/extend.texi (C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39525
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37428
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60664
Bug ID: 60664
Summary: bool / out of range int comparison warning failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57452
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60664
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18637
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
* rtlanal.c (rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1): Fix head comment.
case REG: Return 1 for invalid offsets from the frame pointer.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20140326-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/rtlanal.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60665
Bug ID: 60665
Summary: gcc/ipa-devirt.c:1510:7: warning: variable 'can_refer'
is used uninitialized whenever '?:' condition is false
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59749
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin at
* rtlanal.c (rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1): Fix head comment.
case REG: Return 1 for invalid offsets from the frame pointer.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20140326-1.c
- copied unchanged from r208837,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20140326-1.c
Modified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60452
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60666
Bug ID: 60666
Summary: sese.c:536:11: warning: variable 'stmts' is used
uninitialized whenever '||' condition is true
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56467
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52903
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48777
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60667
Bug ID: 60667
Summary: Undefined behavior in Java FE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60667
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60315
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60315
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60668
Bug ID: 60668
Summary: simplify-rtx.c:1676: minor tidyup in if ... else chain
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60636
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 26 09:18:26 2014
New Revision: 208841
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208841root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/60636
* ubsan.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56781
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 26 09:19:44 2014
New Revision: 208842
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208842root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/56781
* Makefile.def: Set
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60667
Andrew Haley aph at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #6 from ramrad01 at arm dot com ---
On 03/26/14 09:46, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60649
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51088
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60667
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32458
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32458action=edit
gcc49-ubsan.patch
Ah, sounds like a very recent regression, most likely Honza's r208831.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60642
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60662
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can't reproduce this with 4.8.1 or later versions on Fedora, or 4.8.3 on
Debian, neither using your original source code nor your preprocessed source.
Please try debugging this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51088
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60636
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28767
--- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard mark at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Some discussion of the patch in comment #4 can be found here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/threads.html#00225
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669
Bug ID: 60669
Summary: VRP misses asserts for some already defined statements
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #10)
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9)
That's good news, thanks. Did you do a testsuite run for all languages?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #41 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 25-Mar-14, at 11:14 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
After r208780 (for 4.9, not backported yet to 4.8)?
Yes, it still fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. Maybe list is shorter:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
because it's not used in the paths dominated by the conditional.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #42 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
After r208780 (for 4.9, not backported yet to 4.8)?
Yes, it still fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. Maybe list is shorter:
Unsupported rounding for real(16)
...
So the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59908
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
PR39612?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
--- Comment #20 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Mar 26 13:47:46 2014
New Revision: 208844
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208844root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-26 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60419
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #43 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 3/26/2014 8:51 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
Can you uncomment the line
!print *, n_tst, n_cnt
and post the corresponding output?
(en15.2) -98.77E+03 expected:
Hi Guys,
Suppose a programmer creates a function called memset and then
compiles it with gcc. Eg:
% cat memset.c
void *
memset (void *s, int c, unsigned int n)
{
char *v = s;
while (n--)
*v++ = c;
return s;
}
% gcc -O3 -S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60670
Bug ID: 60670
Summary: omp.h may differ between multilibs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60606
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #44 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
What is the output of
use ISO_FORTRAN_ENV
print *, REAL_KINDS
end
?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #45 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 3/26/2014 11:09 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
What is the output of
use ISO_FORTRAN_ENV
print *, REAL_KINDS
end
?
4 8 16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60671
Bug ID: 60671
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/pr49718.C -std=gnu++98
scan-assembler-times __cyg_profile_func_enter 1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60672
Bug ID: 60672
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/auto-fn25.C -std=gnu++1y (test for
errors, line 7)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've now done full before-and-after bootstrap+testsuite runs with
--enable-languages=all,ada,go,obj-c++ on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi: Eric's
patch fixed all Ada regressions, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #46 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
AFAICT on hppa*-*-hpux11* the E format does not round to nearest for tie. What
is the output of the following test
#include stdio.h
int main() {
printf(%.1e %.1e\n,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60673
Bug ID: 60673
Summary: c++11 static thread_local members may cause a segfault
when accessed via 'this-'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60674
Bug ID: 60674
Summary: missed devirtualization in function called by
destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 26 16:50:26 2014
New Revision: 208845
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208845root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60566
PR c++/58678
* class.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #55 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 26 16:50:26 2014
New Revision: 208845
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208845root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60566
PR c++/58678
* class.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60675
Bug ID: 60675
Summary: [4.9 regression][aarch64] internal compiler error:
Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is
achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60675
--- Comment #1 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
---
Seems the testcase is too large. Trimming it more usually causes it not to ICE,
but will try to trim more.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60675
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60674
Bug 60674 depends on bug 60566, which changed state.
Bug 60566 Summary: [4.9 Regression] r208573 omits needed thunks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60566
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
As discussed yesterday with Ramana on IRC, my suggested fix for this for 4.9
is something like:
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c 2014-03-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #47 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 3/26/2014 12:34 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
AFAICT on hppa*-*-hpux11* the E format does not round to nearest for tie. What
is the output of the following test
#include stdio.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60545
--- Comment #2 from Josh Triplett josh at joshtriplett dot org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
The attribute is ms_abi. It is documented in 4.4.0 and above.
From GCC 4.5.0 docuemtnation:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60675
--- Comment #3 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
---
With `-mno-lra` compiles fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60675
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Abdurachmanov from comment #1)
Seems the testcase is too large. Trimming it more usually causes it not to
ICE, but will try to trim more.
Does compressing it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60675
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60675
--- Comment #5 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
---
Created attachment 32460
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32460action=edit
Minimized pre-processed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60676
Bug ID: 60676
Summary: Add vec_xxsldi, vec_xxpermdi to altivec.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60673
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
--- Comment #5 from Matt Thompson matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov ---
An additional thought. You have a reduced test case which dies in Comment #3
(which fails for gfortran 4.9). However, you can make something similar which
succeeds:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59296
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul at preney
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60631
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59296
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
reduced:
struct Type
{
void get() const { }
void get() const { }
};
int main()
{
Type{}.get();
}
The ambiguity happens when both overloads are const-qualified and *this is an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60675
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can reproduce it, I am trying to reduce it. Note using -mcpu=cortex-a57 also
causes the internal error to go away. So I think the scheduler before the
register allocator is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 26 19:32:40 2014
New Revision: 208848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208848root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR other/59545
* real.c (real_to_integer2):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59548
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Mar 26 19:41:16 2014
New Revision: 208850
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208850root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59548
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #49 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 3/26/2014 2:07 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #48 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
AFAICT on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59548
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #50 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 3/26/2014 3:43 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
It looks like hppa rounds toward zero on tie.
This is what the HP-UX Floating-Point Guide says:
If two representable values are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #51 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This is what the HP-UX Floating-Point Guide says:
If two representable values are equally close to
the true value, choose the one whose least significant
bit is 0.
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
Mikhail Veltishchev dichlofos-mv at yandex dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #52 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 3/26/2014 4:20 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #51 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This is what
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note the code isn't invalid, just has undefined behavior.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60677
Bug ID: 60677
Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/ichar_3.f90 -O
(test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60678
Bug ID: 60678
Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL:
gfortran.dg/intrinsics_kind_argument_1.f90 -O (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
--- Comment #8 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com ---
(In reply to Mikhail Veltishchev from comment #7)
Please, can you explain how you fixed this? We have almost the same problem.
Here is the fix we deployed (test case from
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
