http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
--- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Mar 28 05:20:48 2014
New Revision: 20
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=20&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/59545
compiler: Fix bogus invalid static_cast to Unary_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #58 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 27-Mar-14, at 6:31 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
>
> --- Comment #56 from Dominique d'Humieres ens.fr> ---
>> So, probably abort sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #57 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Your results on Darwin match gfortran and ifort on x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57519
--- Comment #1 from Siva Chandra ---
I sent out a patch for this PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01332.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #56 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> So, probably abort shouldn't be called when rounding isn't supported.
The problem is that the rounding to even on tie seems supported by hpux, but
for
98765.0_16 or -98765.0_16: 6 successes out of 8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60522
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Mar 27 22:21:35 2014
New Revision: 208883
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208883&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-27 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/60522
* frontend-passes.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60688
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60676
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
Bug ID: 60692
Summary: ICE with template template parameter (invalid code)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58880
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Mar 27 21:17:43 2014
New Revision: 208879
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208879&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-27 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/58880
* trans-expr.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60672
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Mar 27 21:15:16 2014
New Revision: 208878
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208878&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-03-27 Michael Meissner
Back port from main line:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60642
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60691
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #2)
> It crashes and produces weird results if linked to bFLT.
Yes because EABI is an elf only abi, if it does not have a place for the unwind
tables, then it is incompat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60691
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Vogt ---
It crashes and produces weird results if linked to bFLT.
If SJLJ isn't supported for ARM, why does --enable-sjlj-exceptions still exist?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60689
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60689
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
when the object is bigger than the wordsize the generic __atomic_exchange gets
expanded incorrectly
$ g++11 aa.cc -DN=4 -m32
$ g++11 aa.cc -DN=5 -m32
aa.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
aa.cc:10:49: error: inv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60689
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60691
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Why are you trying to compile with SJLJ exceptions? The unwinding tables on
arm are part of the EABI.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60672
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Mar 27 20:07:16 2014
New Revision: 208877
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208877&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-03-27 Michael Meissner
* config/rs6000/constraints.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60690
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
May be related to PR57703.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60691
Bug ID: 60691
Summary: Build fails in libstdc++ with --enable-sjlj-exceptions
on ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60690
Bug ID: 60690
Summary: Chromium build error with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Still a regression for aggregate-initialization of arrays:
struct A { explicit A(int = 0); };
int main()
{
A a[1] = { };
}
zzz.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
zzz.cc:5:14: error: converting to ‘A’ from in
int, volatile void*, void*, void*, int)’
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.9.0 20140327 (experimental)
...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Mar 27 18:49:44 2014
New Revision: 208876
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208876&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-27 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/60650
* lr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60604
--- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey ---
I didn't notice that just before the emit-rtl.c (validate_subregs) comment
that says:
/* Subregs involving floating point modes are not allowed to
change size. Therefore (subreg:DI (reg:DF) 0) is fine,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60612
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60612
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Mar 27 18:07:25 2014
New Revision: 208871
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208871&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60612
* libsupc++/eh_ptr.cc: Assert __cxa_dependent_ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note the reduced testcase has implicit types, while that isn't necessary to
reproduce this:
struct _wincore
{
int width, height;
};
static void
foo (dpy, winInfo, offset)
void *dpy;
struct _wincor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60606
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Prio
e vase, so is the v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60604
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey ---
I think the underlying bug here is the code we generate for builtin_fabs.
In emit-rtl.c (validate_subreg) I see this comment:
/* Subregs involving floating point modes are not allowed to
change size. T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60688
Bug ID: 60688
Summary: ICE in real_to_decimal_for_mode
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60687
--- Comment #1 from Frank Bergemann ---
Created attachment 32466
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32466&action=edit
test program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60687
Bug ID: 60687
Summary: [4.8.0] Infinite loop compiling recursive templates
indirectly by local class in function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50347
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Mar 27 15:59:07 2014
New Revision: 208870
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/50347
* doc/extend.texi (ffs Builtins): Change unsigned type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #55 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 3/27/2014 11:00 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> Could you test the following code?
Here is output:
Unsupported rounding for real(4)
Unsupported rounding for real(8)
(en15.2) 98.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50347
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #54 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #53 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Dave, Rainer,
>
> Could you test the following code?
Sure: passes on both i386-pc-solaris2.{9,10} with XFAILs on Solaris 9.
> ! { dg-f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60686
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60680
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #53 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Dave, Rainer,
Could you test the following code?
[karma] f90/bug% cat fmt_en_1.f90
! { dg-do run }
! PR60128 Invalid outputs with EN descriptors
! Test case provided by Walt Brainerd.
program pr6012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685
Bug ID: 60685
Summary: exception not caught by enclosing catch
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60682
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 27 13:18:52 2014
New Revision: 208864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/60682
* omp-low.c (lower_omp_1): For gimple_clobber_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60684
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
--- Comment #22 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 27-Mar-14, at 5:37 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> Please commit your patch, I'll adjust mine.
Done.
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60684
Bug ID: 60684
Summary: [4.9 Regression] cp-demangle.c:2149:13: error:
‘gnu_v3_unified_dtor’ undeclared
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60683
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60683
Bug ID: 60683
Summary: confused by earlier errors, bailing out on incorrect
std::initializer_list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60580
mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60682
Bug ID: 60682
Summary: [4.9 Regression][OpenMP] ICE on an assignment of local
variable inside SIMD loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57169
Ilya Palachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iliyapalachev at gmail dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> See this thread:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01222.html
Please commit your patch, I'll adjust mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This fixes this for me, based on:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0552a/BABIDBHE.html
If gas accepts some other value beyond those, the conditions can be tweaked of
course, or it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60681
Bug ID: 60681
Summary: Libbacktrace library doesn't work with QEMU in
application mode
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60315
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On March 26, 2014 10:58:18 PM CET, hubicka at ucw dot cz
wrote:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60315
>
>--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
>> forwprop would do that, but the enum
59 matches
Mail list logo
