[Bug c/60784] Spurious -Wmissing-field-initializers warning for anonymous structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #10) > I'm not questioning the analysis, I'm questioning the solution. Directly > generating a register and jamming in the REGNO in this pattern seems s

[Bug middle-end/60469] simple cilk plus program ICEs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/60718] Test case gfortran.dg/select_type_4.f90 fails on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32554|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug other/60785] New: ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60785 Bug ID: 60785 Summary: ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: othe

[Bug libstdc++/60594] std::function of a type with a declared (but not defined) return type fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60594 Mitsuru Kariya changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/55459] Firefox 17: internal compiler error: in scan_tree_for_params_right_scev, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:633

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55459 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #6 f

[Bug tree-optimization/59817] ICE in extract_affine_chrec with -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59817 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:09:11PM +, lauraelcomeau at yahoo dot co.uk wrote: > > The code is a series of f90 files compiled in a shell script - as attached. > I've also attached the INPUT.f90 file where t

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn --- I'm not questioning the analysis, I'm questioning the solution. Directly generating a register and jamming in the REGNO in this pattern seems sort of crude. gen_rtx_REG (DImode, REGNO (op0)); I don't doubt

[Bug c++/59115] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/60657] [4.9 Regression] ICE: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657 --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law --- The new predicates make the predicate test match the constraint test. It looks like your patch exposes a relationship between the operands, and, yes, the only way to handle that would be in the insn's cond

[Bug c/60784] New: Spurious -Wmissing-field-initializers warning for anonymous structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784 Bug ID: 60784 Summary: Spurious -Wmissing-field-initializers warning for anonymous structure Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/60657] [4.9 Regression] ICE: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- While the improved predicates make the first IN_RANGE tests unneeded, IMHO it should still verify what the second IN_RANGE tests did, i.e. that operands[2] is not 0 and at most 32 - third operand. I think th

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #3 from Laura C --- Created attachment 32562 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32562&action=edit shell script The code is a series of f90 files compiled in a shell script - as attached. I've also attached the INPUT.

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #2 from Laura C --- Created attachment 32561 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32561&action=edit Input.f90 file

[Bug target/60504] [4.9 regression] many Ada testsuite regressions on ARM/Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/60504] [4.9 regression] many Ada testsuite regressions on ARM/Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60504 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Apr 7 21:31:29 2014 New Revision: 209201 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209201&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/60504 * config/arm/arm.h (ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMA

[Bug other/60783] unexpected address variation when taking address of reference, const reference, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60783 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Parke from comment #3) > Thanks, I thought it might be something like the creation of temporaries, > but could not find it discussed anywhere, and was surprised that I got > different behavior fro

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #9 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #7) > Created attachment 32557 [details] > Updated patch that also uses op0_di for the conversion > > Should be equivalent to the previous patch, but more correct m

[Bug other/60783] unexpected address variation when taking address of reference, const reference, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60783 --- Comment #3 from Parke --- Thanks, I thought it might be something like the creation of temporaries, but could not find it discussed anywhere, and was surprised that I got different behavior from 4.7.3 (many temporaries) and 4.8.2 (apparently o

[Bug other/60783] unexpected address variation when taking address of reference, const reference, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60783 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Parke from comment #0) > I in the output, I expect "e" through "l" to be identical. Your expectation is wrong. The functions that produce a different values from what you expect are binding a

[Bug other/60783] unexpected address variation when taking address of reference, const reference, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60783 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug other/60783] New: unexpected address variation when taking address of reference, const reference, etc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60783 Bug ID: 60783 Summary: unexpected address variation when taking address of reference, const reference, etc. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug c++/60775] Instantiates unused class template member function and reports error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60775 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60775] Instantiates unused class template member function and reports error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60775 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- See the last item of http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html

[Bug debug/60782] New: DWARF does not represent _Atomic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60782 Bug ID: 60782 Summary: DWARF does not represent _Atomic Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug c++/60775] Instantiates unused class template member function and therefor reports error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60775 --- Comment #1 from Gunther Laure --- Created attachment 32560 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32560&action=edit Testcase

[Bug testsuite/60773] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773 Cong Hou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||congh at google dot com --- Comment #2 from Co

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/56203] gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 times out on Solaris/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56203 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc*-*-solaris2.* |sparc*-*-solaris2.*

[Bug fortran/60781] New: cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 Bug ID: 60781 Summary: cannot match namelist object name Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/60780] Equivalence statements in nested modules results in fast growing duplicate statements in module files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780 --- Comment #1 from russelldub at gmail dot com --- > Equivalence statements in equivalence statements Should read "Equivalence statements in modules". Apologies.

[Bug fortran/60780] New: Equivalence statements in nested modules results in fast growing duplicate statements in module files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780 Bug ID: 60780 Summary: Equivalence statements in nested modules results in fast growing duplicate statements in module files Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/60779] -fcx-fortran-rules ignored when using -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60779 David Turnbull changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60779] -fcx-fortran-rules ignored when using -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60779 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you provide the extra command line you used?

[Bug c++/60779] New: -fcx-fortran-rules ignored when using -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60779 Bug ID: 60779 Summary: -fcx-fortran-rules ignored when using -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|amacleod at r

[Bug target/60778] New: shift not folded into shift on x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60778 Bug ID: 60778 Summary: shift not folded into shift on x86-64 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug sanitizer/58937] Preloaded libasan segfaults on unsanitized executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937 --- Comment #17 from Yury Gribov --- This should be fully resolved once https://github.com/llvm-mirror/compiler-rt/commit/d6535ea4c4d49078a93735b315b8518fb692a592 is merged into gcc trunk. BTW it no longer reproduces on trunk because newer versio

[Bug target/60609] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609 --- Comment #6 from yroux at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: yroux Date: Mon Apr 7 15:07:33 2014 New Revision: 209191 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209191&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-07 Charles Baylis PR target/60609 * co

[Bug fortran/60777] Fortran 2003: RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: expr.c === --- expr.c (revision 208947) +++ expr.c (working copy) @@ -2733,12 +2733,10 @@ external_spec_function (gfc_

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32553|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #5) > I can see why the proposed patch will work, but it seems a little > heavy-handed. This case isn't something that simplify_gen_subreg() should > han

[Bug fortran/60777] New: Fortran 2003: RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 Bug ID: 60777 Summary: Fortran 2003: RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/60776] [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c and gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug rtl-optimization/60776] [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c and gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Priority|

[Bug rtl-optimization/60776] New: [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c and gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60776 Bug ID: 60776 Summary: [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c and gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug tree-optimization/60766] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong optimization with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60766 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/60766] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong optimization with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60766 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 7 14:03:55 2014 New Revision: 209190 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209190&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-07 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/60766 * tree-s

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn --- I can see why the proposed patch will work, but it seems a little heavy-handed. This case isn't something that simplify_gen_subreg() should handle?

[Bug c/60759] -Wlogical-op should perhaps warn about two-way implicit conversions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60759 --- Comment #3 from Giuliano Procida --- I believe the clang warning is: foo.c:1:18: warning: use of logical '||' with constant operand [-Wconstant-logical-operand] static int x = 2 || 3; ^ ~ foo.c:1:18: note: use '|' for a bit

[Bug target/60410] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] -fshort-double ICEs x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from R

[Bug target/60300] [avr] Suboptimal stack pointer manipulation for frame setup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60300 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann L

[Bug c++/60731] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] dynamic library not getting reinitialized on multiple calls to dlopen()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60731 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 7 13:27:39 2014 New Revision: 209186 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209186&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60731 * common.opt (-fno-gnu-unique): Add. * config/elfos

[Bug c++/60731] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] dynamic library not getting reinitialized on multiple calls to dlopen()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60731 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 7 13:27:45 2014 New Revision: 209187 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209187&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60731 * lib/gcc-dg.exp (dg-build-dso): New. (gcc-dg-test-

[Bug other/60040] AVR: error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_REGS'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040 --- Comment #6 from Sebastian Huber --- GCC 4.9.0 20140407 with the proposed patch fixes the problem for me.

[Bug target/60657] [4.9 Regression] ICE: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657 --- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Author: ramana Date: Mon Apr 7 13:17:11 2014 New Revision: 209185 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209185&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix testcase for PR target/60657 Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite

[Bug tree-optimization/60770] disappearing clobbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60770 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- Catching it earlier may be hard, even for these trivial examples we only have from einline (18) to esra (24) or from eh (10) to ccp1 (21) and in more complicated examples I fear the interval will be empty, but w

[Bug tree-optimization/60766] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong optimization with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60766 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 32556 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32556&action=edit patch The issue is that tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:cand_value_at converts niter ((unsigned int) n_3 * 2863311531 + 4

[Bug c++/60775] New: Instantiates unused class template member function and therefor reports error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60775 Bug ID: 60775 Summary: Instantiates unused class template member function and therefor reports error Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are "", in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/60766] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong optimization with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60766 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/60768] Excessive C++ compile time with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60768 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/60727] ICE in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:892

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60727 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/60769] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60769 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/60770] disappearing clobbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60770 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Yeah, you simply need to catch this earlier ...

[Bug target/60773] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-*-* |powerpc64-*-*, i?86-*-* Priori

[Bug target/60773] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||congh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ipa/60640] [4.9 Regression] ICE edge points to wrong declaration / verify_cgraph_node failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60640 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/60640] [4.9 Regression] ICE edge points to wrong declaration / verify_cgraph_node failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60640 --- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Apr 7 09:54:55 2014 New Revision: 209181 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209181&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-07 Martin Jambor PR ipa/60640 * ipa-cp.c (propagate_c

[Bug ipa/60640] [4.9 Regression] ICE edge points to wrong declaration / verify_cgraph_node failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60640 --- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Apr 7 09:36:10 2014 New Revision: 209180 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209180&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-07 Martin Jambor PR ipa/60640 * ipa-cp.c (propagate_c

[Bug lto/56963] GCC 4.8.0 LTO issue: lto1: internal compiler error: in add_symbol_to_partition, at lto/lto-partition.c:284

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56963 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Václav Zeman from comment #7) > Created attachment 32422 [details] > preprocessed source Works for me with GCC 4.9 on x86-64-gnu-linux with both -fuse-linker-plugin and -fno-use-linker-plugin and

[Bug c++/60750] [4.8 Regression] double free after std::move on string inside throw when compiled with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60750 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0 Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regres

[Bug c++/60750] [4.8/4.9 Regression] double free after std::move on string inside throw when compiled with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60750 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 7 08:38:23 2014 New Revision: 209179 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209179&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-07 Richard Biener PR middle-end/60750 * tree-ssa-oper

[Bug target/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 --- Comment #23 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Mon Apr 7 08:00:55 2014 New Revision: 209176 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209176&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-07 Dominique d'Humieres Backport from