[Bug middle-end/60469] simple cilk plus program ICEs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469 --- Comment #15 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kyukhin Date: Tue Apr 15 06:27:07 2014 New Revision: 209400 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209400root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/c/ PR middle-end/60469 *

[Bug middle-end/60467] ICE with -fcilkplus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60467 --- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kyukhin Date: Tue Apr 15 06:30:08 2014 New Revision: 209401 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209401root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/c-family/ PR middle-end/60467 *

[Bug c/36750] -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- My statement about zero-initialization was inaccurate (thanks), but the general point still stands: in C you have to write ' = {0}' since empty-braces initializer is not

[Bug target/60839] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- With --param vect-max-version-for-alias-checks=10 -Ofast it started with r200968.

[Bug c/60838] bugos warning: initializer element is not a constant expression: int test = (0 ? (1,0) : 0) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60838 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 15 08:02:46 2014 New Revision: 209404 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209404root=gccview=rev Log: PR plugins/59335 * Makefile.in

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 15 08:04:17 2014 New Revision: 209405 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209405root=gccview=rev Log: PR plugins/59335 * Makefile.in

[Bug plugins/59335] Plugin doesn't build on trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target

[Bug c/60838] bugos warning: initializer element is not a constant expression: int test = (0 ? (1,0) : 0) + 1;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60838 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de --- Created attachment 32599 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32599action=edit Pre-processed source of libgcc2.c Command line without pre-processor relevant

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #13 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- Created attachment 32600 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32600action=edit gdb session stepping until the end

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #14 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- I'm now using plain cygwin-1.7.29-2, the cygwin1.dbg now matches with cygwin1.dll. I've alto tried to recompile without -O2. I'm not so familiar with gdb, i've produced a session

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Denis Excoffier from comment #14) I'm now using plain cygwin-1.7.29-2, the cygwin1.dbg now matches with cygwin1.dll. I've alto tried to recompile without -O2. I'm not so

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cgf at gcc dot

[Bug other/60843] New: Documentation: 4.5 Integers/C99 6.3.1.3 (reduce modulo 2^N)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60843 Bug ID: 60843 Summary: Documentation: 4.5 Integers/C99 6.3.1.3 (reduce modulo 2^N) Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/60820] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ice in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:291

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška mliska at suse dot cz --- Patch works for me for net-misc/nx package. Will you merge the patch to gcc-4.9 branch?

[Bug tree-optimization/60844] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in reassoc_stmt_dominates_stmt_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60844 Bug ID: 60844 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in reassoc_stmt_dominates_stmt_p Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/60844] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in reassoc_stmt_dominates_stmt_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60844 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Just as side-note, I tried to reproduce your reported issue and did a personal build of cygwin's gcc. It worked fine in stage2. I couldn't reproduce the reported ICE on stage2. Which

[Bug libstdc++/60734] Undefined behavior in g++-v4/bits/stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60734 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Tue Apr 15 10:52:06 2014 New Revision: 209414 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209414root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60734 * include/bits/stl_tree.h

[Bug libstdc++/60734] Undefined behavior in g++-v4/bits/stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60734 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on trunk so far

[Bug target/60817] gcc configure script misdetects TLS support on x86_64-pc-solaris* with gnu as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60817 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- --- Comment #2 from Ruud Koolen redlizard at redlizard dot nl --- I generated the patch cleanly against trunk. What's wrong with it? Seems to be a

[Bug tree-optimization/60844] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in reassoc_stmt_dominates_stmt_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60844 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another side-note. You should specify option '--disable-multilib'. this is pretty essential as cygwin doesn't support it right now.

[Bug c++/60845] New: print original type for typedef classes in diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60845 Bug ID: 60845 Summary: print original type for typedef classes in diagnostics Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/60823] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_cfg, at cfgexpand.c:5644

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60823 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- I'd like to notice that this is test with using 'omp declare simd' pragma and issue is rather related to its support in gcc.

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- For reduced testcase, I'm now at cca 8KB, but creduce is progressing slowly.

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) For reduced testcase, I'm now at cca 8KB, but creduce is progressing slowly. Yes. I've tried this for a while yesterday, but gave

[Bug libstdc++/60695] std::atomicX doesn't work when X is of zero size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60695 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Tue Apr 15 13:48:07 2014 New Revision: 209418 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209418root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60695 * include/std/atomic

[Bug rtl-optimization/60663] [4.9 Regression] Errors out on valid inline asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60663 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Apr 15 14:04:06 2014 New Revision: 209419 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209419root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/60663 * config/arm/arm.c

[Bug c/60846] New: Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 Bug ID: 60846 Summary: Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug libstdc++/60695] std::atomicX doesn't work when X is of zero size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60695 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Per discussion on IRC, we are going to revert this patch on 4.8, 4.9, and 4.10. This will mean that PR60735 will have to be reopened for a better fix. The patch seems to leave

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c/60846] Add 128-bit integer types for general use on 32-bit/64-bit CPUs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/60817] gcc configure script misdetects TLS support on x86_64-pc-solaris* with gnu as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60817 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/60594] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] std::function of a type with a declared (but not defined) return type fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60594 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Tue Apr 15 15:25:52 2014 New Revision: 209422 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209422root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60594 * include/std/functional

[Bug libstdc++/60594] [4.8/4.9 Regression] std::function of a type with a declared (but not defined) return type fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60594 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.10.0

[Bug c/60847] New: x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 Bug ID: 60847 Summary: x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/56965] nonoverlapping_component_refs_p is bogus and slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56965 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56965] nonoverlapping_component_refs_p is bogus and slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56965 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 15 16:04:11 2014 New Revision: 209423 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209423root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug c/60847] x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 --- Comment #1 from Sanjay Patel spatel at rotateright dot com --- It looks like an extra leading underscore is required to recognize the BMI intrinsics. This is not happening with other (BMI2, SSE4) intrinsics. According to the Intel reference

[Bug target/60847] x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c/60847] x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 Sanjay Patel spatel at rotateright dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |c ---

[Bug target/60847] [4.9/4.10 Regression] x86 BMI intrinsics not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60847 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #19 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- Created attachment 32602 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32602action=edit discover __DTOR_LIST__

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #20 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #12) In general it would be of interest to learn what destructors (by whom) are present in the list called by do_global_dtors (__DTOR_LIST__)

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32603 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32603action=edit pr60841.c Somewhat reduced testcase. With 4.8 as well as r200967 according to -Ofast

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #21 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #17) Just as side-note, I tried to reproduce your reported issue and did a personal build of cygwin's gcc. It worked fine in stage2. I

[Bug tree-optimization/60841] [4.9/4.10 Regression] gcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1) out of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60841 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that -fdump-tree-all dumps are pretty much the same short length, it is just -fdump-tree-vect-details that goes to almost a gig. And, an important thing I've noticed in there is

[Bug libstdc++/60037] SIGFPE in std::generate_canonicalunsigned int...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emsr at gcc dot

[Bug c++/60848] New: Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60848 Bug ID: 60848 Summary: Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #22 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Denis Excoffier from comment #21) (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #17) Just as side-note, I tried to reproduce your reported issue and did a personal build of

[Bug c++/60848] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60848 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/60849] New: bogus comparison result type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849 Bug ID: 60849 Summary: bogus comparison result type Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/60848] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60848 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/60848] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Crash while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60848 --- Comment #3 from ibronstein at klocwork dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) This is of course totally invalid code, you can't define std::initializer_list yourself. Agreed.

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:20:01 2014 New Revision: 209425 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209425root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:25:09 2014 New Revision: 209426 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209426root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:25:09 2014 New Revision: 209426 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209426root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:20:01 2014 New Revision: 209425 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209425root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt

[Bug target/60735] GCC targeting E500 with SPE has errors with the _Decimal64 type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60735 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:30:21 2014 New Revision: 209430 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209430root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Apr 15 18:30:21 2014 New Revision: 209430 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209430root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-15 Bill Schmidt

[Bug target/60839] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] PowerPC: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60839 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sebastian, sorry for the problems. Please double check that reverting this patch has fixed your bootstrap issue and mark the bug resolved if so. Thanks!

[Bug c++/60850] New: pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850 Bug ID: 60850 Summary: pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/60850] pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- patches should go to the gcc-patches list, not bugzilla

[Bug c++/60786] In C++11 an explicit instantiation with an unqualified name must be in the right namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60786 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Tue Apr 15 19:05:45 2014 New Revision: 209431 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209431root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/60786 *

[Bug c++/60786] In C++11 an explicit instantiation with an unqualified name must be in the right namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60786 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've fixed the libstdc++ tests so they don't rely on this bug

[Bug target/60851] New: ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2117 with -flive-range-shrinkage -mdispatch-scheduler -march=bdver4

-checking-yes-rtl-df/ --without-cloog --without-ppl Thread model: posix gcc version 4.10.0 20140415 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug libstdc++/60497] unique_ptrT tries to complete its type T even though it's not required to be a complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60497 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) Now the question would be: are there similar statements throughout the library that could benefit from the same treatment, or is this a

[Bug tree-optimization/60849] bogus comparison result type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849 Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/60849] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] bogus comparison result type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60849 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/60852] New: boost::complement of enum class does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60852 Bug ID: 60852 Summary: boost::complement of enum class does not compile Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug lto/60820] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ice in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:291

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška mliska at suse dot cz --- Patch works for me for net-misc/nx package. Will you merge the patch to

[Bug c++/60852] boost::has_complement of enum class does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60852 --- Comment #1 from Nevin Liber nevin at eviloverlord dot com --- Also filed this as a Boost bug at https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/9913

[Bug c++/60852] boost::has_complement of enum class does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60852 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug c/36839] struct with only anonymous unions plus flexible array member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36839 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/60852] boost::has_complement of enum class does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60852 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels

[Bug libstdc++/60710] experimental::optionalT is using T::operator!=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60710 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- The current Fundamentals TS draft (n3848) doesn't have those operator!= overloads at all, so we may want to remove them entirely rather than fix them ... I'm not sure yet.

[Bug c++/60850] pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Gutson daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com --- It went, but I got no answer. FWIW: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00026.html

[Bug fortran/60853] New: Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853 Bug ID: 60853 Summary: Failure to disambiguate generic with unlimited polymorphic Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/60850] pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to ptr-to-func

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- So keep pinging it, bugzilla isn't the right place.

[Bug c++/60854] New: inline constructor of extern template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60854 Bug ID: 60854 Summary: inline constructor of extern template Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/60855] New: ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured statically allocated array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60855 Bug ID: 60855 Summary: ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured statically allocated array Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/60855] ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured stack-allocated array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60855 --- Comment #1 from Brady J. Garvin bgarvin at acm dot org --- Also ICEs in 4.9.0: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++

[Bug bootstrap/50888] Bootstrap failure in libjava against latest git glibc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888 Wade Colson wade.colson at aol dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wade.colson at

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] New: GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 Bug ID: 60856 Summary: GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 --- Comment #1 from qiuji qiuji at loongson dot cn --- Configuration of the version of gcc I used: 使用内建 specs。 COLLECT_GCC=mips-mti-linux-gnu-gcc 目标：mips-mti-linux-gnu 配置为：/export/tmp/sellcey/for_eembc/src/gcc/configure

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 --- Comment #2 from qiuji qiuji at loongson dot cn --- Created attachment 32613 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32613action=edit compiling log with option -v -save-temps

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/60857] New: segmentation fault after called exit () with a large stack frame.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60857 Bug ID: 60857 Summary: segmentation fault after called exit () with a large stack frame. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/60857] segmentation fault after called exit () with a large stack frame.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60857 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/60856] GCC4.9 inline-asm has wrong register allocation for MIPS64r2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60856 --- Comment #4 from qiuji qiuji at loongson dot cn --- Thanks very much! The problem can be closed.

[Bug c/36750] -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750 --- Comment #10 from nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com --- So should I open a new PR for not warning in C++? Because even the = {0} case warns there.