https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60899
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed May 21 06:16:03 2014
New Revision: 210676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210676root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/60899
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61263
Bug ID: 61263
Summary: gccgo: fatal error: schedule: holding locks [GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61262
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60189
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed May 21 08:03:06 2014
New Revision: 210678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210678root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/cp
PR c/60189
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61252
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 21 08:04:03 2014
New Revision: 210679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210679root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61252
* omp-low.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60189
--- Comment #5 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed May 21 08:05:42 2014
New Revision: 210680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210680root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/cp
PR c/60189
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed May 21 08:06:06 2014
New Revision: 210682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210682root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/54236
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61252
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 21 08:06:04 2014
New Revision: 210681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210681root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61252
* omp-low.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61264
Bug ID: 61264
Summary: gccgo: ICE in __normal_iterator [GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61210
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
Wellamjames feritzpowell at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||feritzpowell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61184
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
This breaks gcc.dg/Wstrict-overflow-18.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61265
Bug ID: 61265
Summary: gccgo: ICE in verify_gimple_in_seq [GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266
Bug ID: 61266
Summary: [4.10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstrict-overflow-18.c
(test for bogus messages, line 20)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61088
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Daniel Richard G. from comment #0)
I built GCC 4.8.1 with --disable-shared --with-pic so that I can
statically link libgcc/libstdc++ into executables,
Instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61088
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
As testcase, this can do, I think:
void f()
{
typedef void (X) ();
X x[] = { [x](){} }; // { dg-error incomplete }
}
something even closer to the original one is of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61088
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
I meant:
void f()
{
typedef void (*X) ();
X x[] = { [x](){} }; // { dg-error incomplete }
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267
Bug ID: 61267
Summary: [MIPS] -march=mips32 does not always disable the use
of branch likely instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61262
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56244
wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wbrana at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268
Bug ID: 61268
Summary: [4.10 regression] ICE in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at
var-tracking.c:8262
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.1 |4.7.2
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
--- Comment #9 from Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: charlet
Date: Wed May 21 12:49:24 2014
New Revision: 210698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210698root=gccview=rev
Log:
Previous change (rev 210697) should have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
Bug ID: 61269
Summary: type_traits includes cstdint inside std namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
One reason for why realloc is hard is that there is no language that says
it is undefined to access the object via the old pointer, but there is only
language that says the old
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61270
Bug ID: 61270
Summary: max-inline-insns-single is too high
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54482
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just compiled gcc trunk 20140521 with boot compiler clang++ -g -O2 -Wall
and it said
1.
../../src/trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1182:8: warning: logical not is only applied
to the left hand side
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Some more:
4.
trunk/gcc/expr.c:10660:10: warning: logical not is only applied to the left
hand side of this comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
Source code
||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51206
gcc at rkeene dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.1 |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from gcc at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #17 from Dan Gohman sunfish at mozilla dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
One reason for why realloc is hard is that there is no language that says
it is undefined to access the object via the old pointer, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Even more:
7.
src/trunk/gcc/lra-spills.c:240:9: warning: logical not is only applied to the
left hand side of this comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
Source code is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
Bug ID: 61272
Summary: [UBSAN] ICE in is_ubsan_builtin_p(tree_node*),
gcc/ubsan.c:534
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
3.
../../src/trunk/gcc/cp/cp-array-notation.c:1420:7: warning: logical not is
only applied to the left hand side of this comparison
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60179
--- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Wed May 21 14:45:36 2014
New Revision: 210714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210714root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-21 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61273
Bug ID: 61273
Summary: gccgo: ICE in
Unsafe_type_conversion_expression::do_get_backend
[GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261
--- Comment #5 from Jacob Abel thatcadguy at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
Slightly reduced test
MODULE modu
IMPLICIT NONE
TYPE element
CLASS(*), ALLOCATABLE :: e
END TYPE element
END MODULE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed May 21 15:09:37 2014
New Revision: 210715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210715root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61269
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #18 from Paul Eggert eggert at gnu dot org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
void foo (int *p)
{
int *q = realloc (p, sizeof (int));
*q = 2;
}
may I remove the store *q = 2 as dead?
Yes, the consensus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #9)
So, what's happening here on the testcase is that before r210519, from the
ira dump for pseudo reg 171 we have
a15 (r171,l0) best
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61274
Bug ID: 61274
Summary: excessive code size with large-unit-insns
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think easiest would be
--- a/gcc/ubsan.c
+++ b/gcc/ubsan.c
@@ -531,9 +538,9 @@ ubsan_instrument_unreachable (location_t loc)
bool
is_ubsan_builtin_p (tree t)
{
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61249
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Michael Tautschnig from comment #2)
Thanks a lot for your quick reply.
Yet r205495 changed _mm_frcz_ss/_mm_frcz_sd so that only a single argument
is passed to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16063
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard mark at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mark
Date: Wed May 21 15:44:59 2014
New Revision: 210717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210717root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/16063. Add DW_AT_type to DW_TAG_enumeration.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
Bug ID: 61275
Summary: Invalid initialization expression for ALLOCATABLE
component in structure constructor at (1)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
Bug ID: 61276
Summary: warn about possible coding errors with logical not (!)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #0)
GCC should have this warning which would have detected several obvious bugs
in GCC itself.
And at least 60 bugs in Fedora
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Just to mention that I cloned PR 61271 to not forget about implementing the
warning once the problematic code is fixed. So this PR should be about
implementing the warning,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
It would also find an unknown number of bugs in Linux kernel,
which compiles with gcc only, sadly.
Which I find sad is that GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On May 21, 2014 5:14:27 PM CEST, eggert at gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #18 from Paul Eggert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61012
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is LTO-symtab bug. In this case we have chain with static var and external
decl and we find no prevailing symbol (correctly), but then instead of choosing
the external decl for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61133
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 21 17:23:07 2014
New Revision: 210720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210720root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61133
* lambda.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
You could suggest GCC diagnostic issues to
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/core-infrastructure-initiative if
you wish
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53097
Shachar Shemesh shachar at shemesh dot biz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shachar at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61212
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61212
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed May 21 18:54:12 2014
New Revision: 210722
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210722root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/61212
* files.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61212
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed May 21 19:07:30 2014
New Revision: 210723
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210723root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/61272
* ubsan.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61143
--- Comment #12 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Wed May 21 19:51:05 2014
New Revision: 210726
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210726root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-05-21 François Dumont
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61215
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Subreg functions in simplify_subreg transform (subreg:hi (plus:si argp 8)) into
(plus:hi (subreg:hi argp) 8). I'll investigate how to avoid this transformation
as LRA works fine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the right fix is
--- a/libstdc++-v3/configure.ac
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/configure.ac
@@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ if test $enable_shared = yes; then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61202
--- Comment #4 from carrot at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: carrot
Date: Wed May 21 20:46:46 2014
New Revision: 210728
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210728root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/61202
* config/aarch64/arm_neon.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
Instead of building GCC with --disable-shared, why not just use
-static-libstdc++ when linking?
It was a long time ago that I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261
Jouko Orava jouko.orava at iki dot fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jouko.orava at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102
--- Comment #9 from Sandra Loosemore sandra at codesourcery dot com ---
I've been looking at this a little bit more.
DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM is specifically documented to take a hard register number as
its operand, so the assertion in dwf_regno is at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61277
Bug ID: 61277
Summary: Incorrect -Warray-bounds warning with 4.9.0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140521 (experimental) [trunk revision 210675] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-4.9.0 -flto -O0 -c foo.c
$ gcc-4.9.0 -flto -O1 -c main.c
$ gcc-4.9.0 -flto -O1 foo.o main.o
$ a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 -c foo.c
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -c main.c
$ gcc-trunk -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
Bug ID: 61279
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE in loop_preheader_edge, at
cfgloop.c:1668 w/ -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60324
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu May 22 03:51:25 2014
New Revision: 210738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210738root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR 60324 Handle long path names, don't use PATH_MAX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61280
Bug ID: 61280
Summary: GCC 4.8.2 suppresses -Wsign-compare caused by macro
defined in system header
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61281
Bug ID: 61281
Summary: Memory corruption on assigning a polymorphic variable
to a non-polymorphic one
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61012
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu May 22 05:35:32 2014
New Revision: 210739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210739root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR lto/61012
* lto-symtab.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61012
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu May 22 05:38:04 2014
New Revision: 210740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210740root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR lto/61012
* lto-symtab.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61012
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
94 matches
Mail list logo
