[Bug tree-optimization/61569] New: faggressive-loop-optimizations overoptimize loop checks with unpredicted result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61569 Bug ID: 61569 Summary: faggressive-loop-optimizations overoptimize loop checks with unpredicted result Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/61123] With LTO, -fno-short-enums is ignored, resulting in ABI mis-matching in linking.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123 --- Comment #6 from Hale Wang Hale.Wang at arm dot com --- Thanks for Zhenqiang Chen's help. This bug is fixed. Refer to the link https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01429.html

[Bug target/61570] New: -march=native CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction under QEMU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570 Bug ID: 61570 Summary: -march=native CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction under QEMU Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/61571] New: bad aliasing -- wrong FRE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61571 Bug ID: 61571 Summary: bad aliasing -- wrong FRE Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/61571] bad aliasing -- wrong FRE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61571 --- Comment #1 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32979 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32979action=edit source file

[Bug rtl-optimization/61572] New: [4.10 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61572 Bug ID: 61572 Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1335 Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/61571] bad aliasing -- wrong FRE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61571 davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard.guenther at

[Bug middle-end/61573] New: [ICE] Segfault while Linux 3.15 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573 Bug ID: 61573 Summary: [ICE] Segfault while Linux 3.15 build Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/61573] [ICE] Segfault while Linux 3.15 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/61573] [ICE] Segfault while Linux 3.15 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/61573] [4.10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/61573] [4.10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573 Martin Liška mliska at suse dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot

[Bug middle-end/61573] [4.10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška mliska at suse dot cz --- fndecl deletion place: Old value = (tree) 0x76d4a700 New value = (tree) 0xa5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5 memset () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/memset.S:90 90../sysdeps/x86_64/memset.S: No such file

[Bug target/61570] -march=native CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction under QEMU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Well, qemu seems confused (as usual). Having lm and lahf_lmin the CPUID feature flags and a 48-bit virtual address space implies being 64-bit, but Intel Family 6 Model 13

[Bug target/61570] -march=native CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction under QEMU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sure, but for this model AFAIK we go through the default: case of PENTIUMPRO anyway, where we only test the flags, so even if it used some completely unknown family number, it would

[Bug ipa/61211] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge points to wrong declaration with -O3 -fno-inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61211 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Jun 20 09:54:39 2014 New Revision: 211844 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211844root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-06-20 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz

[Bug ipa/61211] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge points to wrong declaration with -O3 -fno-inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61211 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Jun 20 09:57:53 2014 New Revision: 211845 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211845root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-06-20 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz

[Bug ipa/61211] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge points to wrong declaration with -O3 -fno-inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61211 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/61570] -march=native CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction under QEMU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570 Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug sanitizer/61530] [4.10 Regression] segfault with asan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61530 --- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Fri Jun 20 10:26:55 2014 New Revision: 211846 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211846root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-06-18 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com

[Bug ipa/61540] internal compiler error in try_make_edge_direct_virtual_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61540 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Jun 20 11:19:46 2014 New Revision: 211847 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211847root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-06-20 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz

[Bug ipa/61540] internal compiler error in try_make_edge_direct_virtual_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61540 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Jun 20 11:26:42 2014 New Revision: 211848 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211848root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-06-20 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz

[Bug ipa/61540] internal compiler error in try_make_edge_direct_virtual_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61540 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libitm/52482] libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482 venture37 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||venture37 at gmail dot com

[Bug libitm/52482] libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482 --- Comment #7 from venture37 at gmail dot com --- This is on 32bit PowerPC 7450 system Darwin 8.11.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.0: Wed Oct 10 18:26:00 PDT 2007; root:xnu-792.24.17~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc

[Bug rtl-optimization/61572] [4.10 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61572 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/61554] [4.10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61554 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug regression/61510] [4.10 Regression]: 20_util/scoped_allocator/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc and tr1/6_containers/tuple/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61510 --- Comment #4 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Obviously something simple like this will fix the problem, but I don't know the area to say that it doesn't just mask a deeper bug. Honza? --- 2014-06-19 James Greenhalgh

[Bug c++/61121] -ftree-parallelize-loops=n (n as value) not accepted in 4.9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61121 Jim Michaels jmichae3 at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/61121] -O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=0 for maximum not accepted in 4.9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61121 Jim Michaels jmichae3 at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-ftree-parallelize-loops=n |-O2

[Bug c++/61121] -O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=0 for maximum not accepted in 4.9.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61121 --- Comment #7 from Jim Michaels jmichae3 at yahoo dot com --- http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd405485%28v=vs.85%29.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms679351%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

[Bug c++/61568] unscoped enums different types differ from __underlying_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61568 Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at

[Bug c++/61574] New: Confusing .debug_line generation by -g option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61574 Bug ID: 61574 Summary: Confusing .debug_line generation by -g option Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/61556] [c++11][4.9/4.10 Regression] ‘*(const ValueType*)this’ is not a constant expression with valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61556 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 20 18:31:53 2014 New Revision: 211853 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211853root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61556 * call.c (build_over_call):

[Bug c++/59296] [c++11] ref-qualified member function is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59296 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 20 18:32:35 2014 New Revision: 211854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211854root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/59296 * call.c

[Bug c++/60265] [C++11] using-declaration of enumerator fails if fully qualified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60265 Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/59296] [c++11] ref-qualified member function is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59296 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 20 18:35:19 2014 New Revision: 211856 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211856root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/59296 * call.c

[Bug c++/61556] [c++11][4.9/4.10 Regression] ‘*(const ValueType*)this’ is not a constant expression with valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61556 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 20 18:34:37 2014 New Revision: 211855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211855root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61556 * call.c (build_over_call):

[Bug c++/61568] unscoped enums different types differ from __underlying_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61568 --- Comment #2 from Melissa myriachan at cox dot net --- (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #1) The C++ standard requires an unscoped enumeration type with an underlying type that is not fixed to promote to signed int, if signed int is

[Bug c++/61574] Confusing .debug_line generation by -g option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61574 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is deconstructors.

[Bug fortran/33363] gfortran is missing -fcase-preserve option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33363 --- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Fri Jun 20 20:11:30 2014 New Revision: 211858 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211858root=gccview=rev Log: PR fortran/33363 *

[Bug fortran/33363] gfortran is missing -fcase-preserve option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33363 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/61565] [4.10 Regression] ICE building libjava/interpret.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61565 --- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01637.html

[Bug libfortran/37634] Fix libgfortran compiling to support GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37634 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/61575] New: [4.9 Regression] Bogus invalid initialization of reference of type 'const D' from expression of type 'brace-enclosed initializer list'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61575 Bug ID: 61575 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bogus invalid initialization of reference of type 'const D' from expression of type 'brace-enclosed initializer list' Product: gcc

[Bug c++/61575] [4.9 Regression] Bogus invalid initialization of reference of type 'const D' from expression of type 'brace-enclosed initializer list'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61575 --- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- Sorry, cut/paste error. Both gcc-svn-4_9-r211828/bin/gcc gcc-svn-4_9-r211175/bin/gcc fails the same way.

[Bug target/52268] tls support should be added for darwin11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug debug/59051] DW_tag_restrict_type not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59051 Mark Wielaard mark at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/61576] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

version 4.10.0 20140620 (experimental) [trunk revision 211848] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out 0 $ gcc-4.9.0 -O3 small.c; a.out 0 $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c; a.out 1 $ int printf (const char *, ...); volatile int a, b; int c, d, e, f; static int fn1

[Bug c++/61538] g++ compiled binary, linked to glibc libpthread, hangs on SGI MIPS R1x000 systems on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61538 --- Comment #10 from Joshua Kinard kumba at gentoo dot org --- I rebuilt both glibc-2.19 and gcc-4.8.3 w/ debugging, though gcc's build system managed to strip out or optimize away some of the debugging code. That said, it's enough to see that

[Bug c++/61538] g++ compiled binary, linked to glibc libpthread, hangs on SGI MIPS R1x000 systems on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61538 --- Comment #11 from Joshua Kinard kumba at gentoo dot org --- I also have another test case from glibc itself, where when compiling glibc-2.19 w/ gcc-4.8.x or greater, at the end, it creates a statically-linked version of 'ln' as 'sln', and