https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582
--- Comment #7 from Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(.*{100}{100}{100}) seems to be a stack overflow. It's because regex executor
uses recursion. It could be fixed (not segfault but memory exhaustion) by using
a std::stack and simulate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61601
--- Comment #2 from Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
Tim, how hard would it be to hardcode limits somewhere for these cases?
It's easy. 6 lines. I'll propose a patch soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582
--- Comment #8 from Maksymilian Arciemowicz max at cert dot cx ---
(In reply to Tim Shen from comment #7)
(.*{100}{100}{100}) seems to be a stack overflow. It's because regex
executor uses recursion. It could be fixed (not segfault but memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582
--- Comment #9 from Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Maksymilian Arciemowicz from comment #8)
(In reply to Tim Shen from comment #7)
(.*{100}{100}{100}) seems to be a stack overflow. It's because regex
executor uses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616
Bug ID: 61616
Summary: Internal compiler error during reload in gcc-4.7.4
configured as a cross-compiler for a mips target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947
--- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to amker from comment #15)
Well, only thing suspicious that I can see, the memset function is a special
implementation and not from C standard library. Basically
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61604
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 26 07:44:10 2014
New Revision: 212011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212011root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Upstream support for gcc-4.7 has just ended. Please try gcc-4.8.3 or gcc-4.9.0
instead and report whether they work or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61391
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
It turned out that wrong PR number was used in ChangeLog. In fact this bug was
fixed:
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211263root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582
--- Comment #10 from Maksymilian Arciemowicz max at cert dot cx ---
There is also one other alternative like this
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/regex/regcomp.c.diff?r1=1.29r2=1.30f=h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61576
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61614
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
What do you mean by sometime after? Is that commit or something else, later?
In case we should bisect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61614
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947
--- Comment #17 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #16)
(In reply to amker from comment #15)
Well, only thing suspicious that I can see, the memset function is a special
implementation and not from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58051
piotr5 at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotr5 at netscape dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616
--- Comment #2 from niva at niisi dot msk.ru ---
I've checked that gcc-4.8.1 works OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It will be ready when it's ready - there are bigger issues that are higher
priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
Yes, sure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61617
Bug ID: 61617
Summary: add boost::coroutine
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58051
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61617
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to piotr5 from comment #0)
this has been suggested for addition in the next standard.
So have lots of other things, many of them contradictory.
We've got plenty of work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61614
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58051
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I wonder if it's this simple:
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -8618,8 +8618,6 @@ check_return_expr (tree retval, bool *no_warning)
|| TREE_CODE (retval)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858
--- Comment #14 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
Steven, is it possible to emit NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION_END in such way that it
would not split the call and its NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61507
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33009
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33009action=edit
Updated patch that introduces trap_shadows pass after eh_ranges
Updated patch due to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #12 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33010
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33010action=edit
A patch candidate that I am currently testing
This the patch I am running through
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39270
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
GGanesh Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian at amd dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972
--- Comment #4 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com ---
Could someone confirm this bug? The 4.9 I have does not ICEs and still refuses
both sources.
akim@erebus /tmp $ g++-mp-4.9 --version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 26 11:29:34 2014
New Revision: 212026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212026root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61614
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61613
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61617
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61610
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems to be fixed on trunk, probably by Ville's fix for protected members.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard mark at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is DWARFv5 proposal for this now:
http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=131105.1
This adds DW_AT_reference[_qualifier] and DW_AT_rvalue_reference[_qualifier] as
attributes to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972
--- Comment #6 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
Seems to be fixed on trunk, probably by Ville's fix for protected members.
Yes, that fix is for 59483, I didn't wish to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The bogus loop cancelling is fixed as well as the equivalence recording. Still
DOM does
Registering jump thread: (3, 4) incoming edge; (4, 5) joiner; (5, 6)
normal;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #6)
Makes sense to me, I'll do that for the local-class example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61618
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61618
Bug ID: 61618
Summary: [4.10 Regression]: ICE in expand_vec_perm_pblendv, at
config/i386/i386.c with -mavx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5)
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
After providing all the missing 'USE' items:
Where did you get them?
Dear Jerry,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61618
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Testcase (compile with -O2 -mavx):
--cut here--
typedef float V __attribute__ ((vector_size (32)));
typedef unsigned int VI __attribute__ ((vector_size (32)));
extern V a, b, c, d;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61433
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61459
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61488
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61542
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61557
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61614
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61575
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60854
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60929
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60990
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61144
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39270
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61619
Bug ID: 61619
Summary: Benefits from -ftree-vectorize lost easily when
changing unrelated code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61144
--- Comment #22 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx ---
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61618
Stupachenko Evgeny evstupac at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evstupac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61619
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61619
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
Unfortunately the inits look like
[/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_algobase.h : 378:6] MEM[(char *
{ref-all})S] = MEM[(char *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61619
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59611
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60249
--- Comment #3 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net ---
On 06/25/2014 01:45 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60249
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61620
Bug ID: 61620
Summary: FAIL: go.test/test/fixedbugs/bug242.go execution, -O2
-g
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55136
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Closely related to PR39270.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61621
Bug ID: 61621
Summary: Normal enum switch slower than test case.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61503
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Thu Jun 26 15:27:52 2014
New Revision: 212036
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212036root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56633
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
This is fixed in mainline, I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61503
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56633
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 26 15:34:59 2014
New Revision: 212037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212037root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56633
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6940
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61298
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
I think I have seen this bug before. The problem comes from using
non-logical compares for equal but logical compares for the others.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61433
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61581
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61596
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61451
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz ---
If anyone is interested in what architecutres are affected without looking at
the source code, there are rough statistics of ICEs encountered since it first
appeared:
ICEs count |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61484
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61470
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo