https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61718
Bug ID: 61718
Summary: Visibility issue with template class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61715
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61718
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61718
--- Comment #2 from goughost goughost at yahoo dot com.cn ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
defaultnothinghidden
Simple since YYY is hidden (by the paragma), XXXYYY* has to be also hidden
because there is no way to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61719
Bug ID: 61719
Summary: misleading error message
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61720
Bug ID: 61720
Summary: std::regex_search matches incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c scan-assembler-not test[lq]
Still failing after revision r210921 (-m32 only).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #29 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cbaylis
Date: Sat Jul 5 11:58:06 2014
New Revision: 212303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212303root=gccview=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR target/49423
2014-07-05 Charles Baylis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61682
Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
Bug ID: 61721
Summary: GCC 4.8-4.10 miscompiles webkit hashing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
--- Comment #1 from Lauri Kasanen cand at gmx dot com ---
Created attachment 33073
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33073action=edit
Failing preprocessed source from 4.10-git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
--- Comment #2 from Lauri Kasanen cand at gmx dot com ---
Created attachment 33074
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33074action=edit
Working case from 4.10-git (-fno-inline)
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/tmp/install --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
--disable-multilib --with-system-zlib --enable-languages=c,c++
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140705 (experimental) (GCC)
Full build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61722
Bug ID: 61722
Summary: [ 4.9 ] gcc sometimes does not optimise movaps with
movups
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
--- Comment #5 from Lauri Kasanen cand at gmx dot com ---
A -fsanitize=undefined built binary does not print anything. I understand it
can't catch all undefined behavior?
What is more interesting that adding -fsanitize=undefined to a failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61721
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
Bug ID: 61723
Summary: [C++11] ICE in contains_struct_check
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #1 from Trevor Saunders tsaunders at mozilla dot com ---
The following patch compiles with 4.9 for me, but I don't have easy
access to a machine with 4.5 on it, would you mind testing if it works
for you?
diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61724
Bug ID: 61724
Summary: Some loops not vectorised
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61724
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Most likely aliasing is getting in the way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61725
Bug ID: 61725
Summary: [4.9 Regression] __builtin_ffs(0) leads to bad code
generation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #2 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com ---
(In reply to Trevor Saunders from comment #1)
The following patch compiles with 4.9 for me, but I don't have easy
access to a machine with 4.5 on it, would you mind testing if it works
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #3 from Trevor Saunders tsaunders at mozilla dot com ---
(In reply to Trevor Saunders from comment #1)
The following patch compiles with 4.9 for me, but I don't have easy
access to a machine with 4.5 on it, would you mind testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #4 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com ---
Created attachment 33076
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33076action=edit
make log after trying patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #5 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com ---
(In reply to Trevor Saunders from comment #3)
Is the below list complete? I'd expect to see
errors for the partial specialization for true as well.
Attached the full make log.
26 matches
Mail list logo
