https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
Bug ID: 61875
Summary: ATRIBUTE_NONNULL macro error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
Marat Zakirov m.zakirov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.zakirov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #6)
Marc, are you going to send your patch to the mailing list (CC Jason)?
Sorry, I don't remember this patch at all. I may try again to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
Tatiana Udalova t.udalova at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t.udalova
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61867
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
I think that all that needs to happen is a warning is produced
where either the detection or reduction takes place.
There is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61822
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Hi Rainer,
Could you try attached patch to check if it helps (test should not be
run for sparc).
Thanks ahead.
Yuri..
2014-07-16 19:20 GMT+04:00 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
Bug ID: 61876
Summary: Converting __builtin_round + cast into
__builtin_lround is not always equivalent in regards
to math errno
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61877
Bug ID: 61877
Summary: [4.10 Regression]: reflect: cannot use []string as
type string in Call
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61877
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Shopov lists at kambanaria dot org ---
I will provide additional information if necessary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61822
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Hi Rainer,
Could you try attached patch to check if it helps (test should not be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61873
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61870
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61822
--- Comment #5 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Tue Jul 22 12:53:04 2014
New Revision: 212911
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212911root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61752
--- Comment #2 from jon.turney at dronecode dot org.uk ---
Better patch: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-07/msg00180.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61878
Bug ID: 61878
Summary: Missing intrinsic functions in avx512intrin.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808
--- Comment #12 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com ---
Note that this bug is present once more when -fno-use-all-virtuals is used.
With the original testcase gcc again produces an undefined reference to
_ZN3barD0Ev.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61879
Bug ID: 61879
Summary: [4.10 Regression] GCC gives note: non-delegitimized
UNSPEC UNSPEC_GOTOFF (1) found in variable location
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #34 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas
at gmail dot com ---
Hi Dominique,
Should one be getting false? It seems to me that the code looks right.
within the do loop:
new_prt_spec ([string_t's]) produces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61880
Bug ID: 61880
Summary: Linking with external functions in C does not work in
GO when using gccgo, while it works in gc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61864
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61881
Bug ID: 61881
Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_to_class with assumed-rank
CLASS(*)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Jul 22 16:20:25 2014
New Revision: 212915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212915root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-07-22 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Actually at the cauldron discussion I got an idea that it may be issue with
anchor generation
not bringing in all the constructors. Is the problem there that constructors of
static
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
Actually at the cauldron discussion I got an idea that it may be issue with
anchor generation
not bringing in all the constructors. Is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61882
Bug ID: 61882
Summary: attribute weak ignored for function templates
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Eric, dou you have any plans regarding this issue?
Sure, see comment #3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61579
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems that the location of __FILE__ is generally broken, e.g. on
extern void foo (int i);
void
f (void)
{
foo (__FILE__);
}
the column info is wrong as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61881
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61748
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61878
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61826
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641
Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The same for __DATE__, __TIME__, __LINE__.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61883
Bug ID: 61883
Summary: [4.10 Regression]ICE for gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c on arm
target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61883
--- Comment #1 from wangzheyu tony.wang at arm dot com ---
For target don't support tls, the above simple test case will fail for the same
reason of gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony.wang at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61883
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #7 from wangzheyu tony.wang at arm dot com ---
I have a simpler test case to reproduce this bug, it should be an old bug for
the tree-emutls pass. The way this pass mapping the control vars and tls vars
hasn't consider that there may
45 matches
Mail list logo