[Bug preprocessor/61613] ,##__VA_ARGS__ fails to expand the first variadic argument if it is a macro-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61613 --- Comment #4 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com --- Created attachment 33288 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33288action=edit Fix Well, I decided to Do The Right Thing for users. Here is a working patch. Let's see

[Bug fortran/61950] [4.10 regression] Many 64-bit fortran allocate tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61950 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/61950] [4.10 regression] Many 64-bit fortran allocate tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61950 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Aug 11 07:49:30 2014 New Revision: 213809 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213809root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-11 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug fortran/62044] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in USE statement with RENAME for extended derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62044 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug lto/62067] lto-lang.c:549: too many calls to va_end on some code paths ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62067 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/62081] [4.10 Regression] ICE: in fix_loop_structure, at loop-init.c:208 with -fno-tree-ch -fno-tree-cselim -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-reassoc -fno-tree-sink

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62081 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/62079] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:401 with -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62079 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/62078] [4.10 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 2 with -fdelete-dead-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62078 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, lto

[Bug ipa/62016] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] very slow compilation at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62016 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/62075] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Vectorizer ICE on dolphin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62075 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/62075] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Vectorizer ICE on dolphin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62075 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/61927] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong results with loop vectorization of: var[i] = ABS_EXPRvar2[i] 9.9e-7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug c++/62072] [4.9/4.10 regression] No SFINAE performed for function type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62072 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug middle-end/61486] ICE with #pragma omp teams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61486 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/62085] SFINAE where specialization parameter class member returns an abstract type fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62085 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- For a short piece of code with no external dependencies it's simpler to just paste it into a comment than attach it: templatetypename T struct A { T f(); }; templatetypename T,

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/62082] cout fails to work with auto variable initialized with curvy brackets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62082 Aleksej aleksej.penkov at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/60228] ICE using lambda in #pragma omp declare reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- I would not call this valid, because OpenMP 4.0 doesn't support C++11, thus using C++11 constructs inside of OpenMP constructs is invalid.

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #5 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) Also fails with the 4.9.0 release on x86_64. Also fails with the GCC 4.9 on Aarch64 target.

[Bug fortran/62087] New: A Piece of code compiling with ifort but giving error by gfortran 4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62087 Bug ID: 62087 Summary: A Piece of code compiling with ifort but giving error by gfortran 4.8 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/62016] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] very slow compilation at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62016 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- In 4.9/trunk I think the compile time improved with r208831 , though I was testing tiny bit different testcase - if (p1 != 0) __builtin_abort (); instead of assert (p1 == 0);,

[Bug c/62070] ICE: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62070 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking

[Bug tree-optimization/62070] ICE: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62070 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Aug 11 10:55:10 2014 New Revision: 213810 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213810root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-11 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/62070] ICE: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62070 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/62069] [GCC-4.10.1] ICE: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:10625

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62069 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/62073] Segmentation fault with tree vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62073 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Aug 11 11:24:35 2014 New Revision: 213812 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213812root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-11 Felix Yang fei.yang0...@gmail.com

[Bug c/62073] Segmentation fault with tree vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62073 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/62088] New: [GCC-4.10.1] Compilation failed to produce executable: torture with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62088 Bug ID: 62088 Summary: [GCC-4.10.1] Compilation failed to produce executable: torture with -fsanitize=address Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/62025] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Miscompilation of openssl sha512.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62025 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note, when I replace the if+abort with a printout of all the 8 c.h[] values and take a poll of the results from: ./cc1.208700 -m31 -O0 sha.c -o sha0.s -quiet -nostdinc ./cc1.207604

[Bug c++/36961] fails to identify template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36961 Ivan Sorokin vanyacpp at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vanyacpp at

[Bug c++/36961] fails to identify template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36961 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/36961] fails to identify template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36961 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- For completeness, trunk says this for the reduced testcase in comment 7: d.cc: In function ‘int main()’: d.cc:17:12: error: no matching function for call to ‘f(foo)’ f(foo());

[Bug sanitizer/62089] Sanitizer may fail to instrument struct accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62089 Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at

[Bug sanitizer/62089] New: Sanitizer may fail to instrument struct accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62089 Bug ID: 62089 Summary: Sanitizer may fail to instrument struct accesses Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/62011] False Data Dependency in popcnt instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62011 Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at

[Bug tree-optimization/62075] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Vectorizer ICE on dolphin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62075 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Aug 11 14:48:24 2014 New Revision: 213815 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213815root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-11 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug target/61413] __ARM_SIZEOF_WCHAR_T is constant 32 -- should be 4 or 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61413 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/61743] [4.10 Regression] Complete unroll is not happened for loops with short upper bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743 --- Comment #8 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Richard, I tested both proposed fixes and i turned out that the first one is preferable since performance of benchmark came back. Note that hoisting 2nd vrp pass gave us another

[Bug fortran/62087] A Piece of code compiling with ifort but giving error by gfortran 4.8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62087 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/62090] New: ice in compute_may_aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62090 Bug ID: 62090 Summary: ice in compute_may_aliases Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug c/62090] ice in compute_may_aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62090 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Created attachment 33290 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33290action=edit C source code

[Bug c++/62091] New: ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 Bug ID: 62091 Summary: ice in before_dom_children Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 --- Comment #2 from baoshan pangbw at gmail dot com --- Are you sure \u00A8\u00AA\u00AD\u00AF\u00B2\u00B5 is invalid for C++ standard? or it is just invalid for GCC now? I extracted this code from a C++ test suite, and I think it should be valid

[Bug other/62092] New: libgomp.c++/target-2.C FAIL while compiling for OpenMP 4.0 offload target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62092 Bug ID: 62092 Summary: libgomp.c++/target-2.C FAIL while compiling for OpenMP 4.0 offload target Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- N.B. you're not compiling it as C++11, you're compiling it as C89

[Bug target/62025] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Miscompilation of openssl sha512.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62025 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've applied on top of r207604 just the https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/config/s390/s390.h?r1=207605r2=207604pathrev=207605 change and the testcase was miscompiled too, so

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/61641] [4.9/4.10 Regression] undefined label in jump_table_data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61641 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #33271|0 |1

[Bug c/62090] ice in compute_may_aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62090 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug lto/58042] MinGW GCC produces problematic x64 executable with -O2 -static -flto -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58042 Domani Hannes ssbssa at yahoo dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at yahoo

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/12596 regarding the #if 0 question. You could always raise a DR with WG14 or WG21 to try to get this question

[Bug c/62093] New: multi-argument section attribute for bss, rodata, data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62093 Bug ID: 62093 Summary: multi-argument section attribute for bss, rodata, data Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug preprocessor/62086] A bug with option -fextended-identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62086 baoshan pangbw at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/62094] New: Program crash when executing DEALLOCATE with addresses that have 0 in bits 26 and higher (little-endian)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094 Bug ID: 62094 Summary: Program crash when executing DEALLOCATE with addresses that have 0 in bits 26 and higher (little-endian) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug libfortran/62094] Program crash when executing DEALLOCATE with addresses that have 0 in bits 26 and higher (little-endian)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/62038] Out of range branch target in thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62038 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Aug 11 19:07:16 2014 New Revision: 213829 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213829root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/62038 * config/pa/pa.c

[Bug target/62038] Out of range branch target in thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62038 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Aug 11 19:10:59 2014 New Revision: 213830 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213830root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/62038 * config/pa/pa.c

[Bug target/62038] Out of range branch target in thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62038 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Aug 11 19:13:46 2014 New Revision: 213831 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213831root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/62038 * config/pa/pa.c

[Bug c++/62080] Suboptimal code generation with eigen library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62080 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Schindler beschindler at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2) (note that a minimal, self-contained testcase would be much better and shouldn't be hard to produce) I don't mind doing so, but

[Bug libfortran/62094] Program crash when executing DEALLOCATE with addresses that have 0 in bits 26 and higher (little-endian)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094 --- Comment #2 from sham at Central dot UH.EDU --- Thanks, Steve. My pick of libgfortran as product line was because it was the closest from the limited choices that the bug report form offered. As you observed, this is probably just a LIBC

[Bug other/62095] New: gcc: error: unrecognized command line option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62095 Bug ID: 62095 Summary: gcc: error: unrecognized command line option Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/62038] Out of range branch target in thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62038 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/62094] Program crash when executing DEALLOCATE with addresses that have 0 in bits 26 and higher (little-endian)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 07:17:15PM +, sham at Central dot UH.EDU wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094 --- Comment #2 from sham at Central dot

[Bug c++/62096] New: unexpected warning overflow in implicit constant conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62096 Bug ID: 62096 Summary: unexpected warning overflow in implicit constant conversion Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/62038] Out of range branch target in thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62038 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug other/62095] gcc: error: unrecognized command line option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62095 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is by design. In fact this was a design change in the last few years.

[Bug other/62095] gcc: error: unrecognized command line option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62095 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libgcc/62097] New: mipsel-sde-elf build fails on OS X 10.7 host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62097 Bug ID: 62097 Summary: mipsel-sde-elf build fails on OS X 10.7 host Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libgcc/62097] mipsel-sde-elf build fails on OS X 10.7 host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62097 --- Comment #1 from Anders Montonen Anders.Montonen at iki dot fi --- Created attachment 33295 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33295action=edit Config log

[Bug c++/62080] Suboptimal code generation with eigen library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62080 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- With the intrinsics patch, I notice that we don't simplify in gimple either: _40 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR__m128i(_39); MEM[(__m128i * {ref-all})vec_4(D)] = _40; _60 = MEM[(const

[Bug target/62098] New: incorrect code generated by arm gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62098 Bug ID: 62098 Summary: incorrect code generated by arm gcc Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug other/62095] gcc: error: unrecognized command line option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62095 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug preprocessor/61613] ,##__VA_ARGS__ fails to expand the first variadic argument if it is a macro-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61613 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug sanitizer/58543] Invalid unpoisoning of stack redzones on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543 --- Comment #12 from yroux at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: yroux Date: Mon Aug 11 21:57:46 2014 New Revision: 213841 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213841root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-11 Michael Collison michael.colli...@linaro.org

[Bug target/59744] miscompilation of unsigned comparison on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59744 --- Comment #8 from yroux at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: yroux Date: Mon Aug 11 22:08:03 2014 New Revision: 213842 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213842root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ 2014-08-11 Michael Collison michael.colli...@linaro.org

[Bug bootstrap/62099] New: bootstrap build fails on ARM hard float system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62099 Bug ID: 62099 Summary: bootstrap build fails on ARM hard float system Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/62099] bootstrap build fails on ARM hard float system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62099 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- How are you configuring GCC? armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf is the same as armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi unless you add a few extra configure options.

[Bug bootstrap/62099] bootstrap build fails on ARM hard float system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62099 --- Comment #2 from Peter A. Bigot pab at pabigot dot com --- Created attachment 33296 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33296action=edit config.log from failed build

[Bug bootstrap/62099] bootstrap build fails on ARM hard float system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62099 --- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot pab at pabigot dot com --- $ ../gcc-4.9.1/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/local/gcc Hopefully the attached config.log will have more useful information.

[Bug bootstrap/62099] bootstrap build fails on ARM hard float system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62099 --- Comment #4 from Peter A. Bigot pab at pabigot dot com --- If you mean how did OpenEmbedded configure the compiler that's being used for the bootstrap, that's an uglier question that I can't really answer since it's got various patches and

[Bug bootstrap/62099] bootstrap build fails on ARM hard float system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62099 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- You need to use -with-float=hard when configuring GCC.

[Bug libstdc++/62100] New: c++11 threads invoke pure virtual function on arm embedded system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62100 Bug ID: 62100 Summary: c++11 threads invoke pure virtual function on arm embedded system Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/26472] Default path for libgcc_s.sl is build directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26472 wzis wzis at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wzis at hotmail dot com

[Bug bootstrap/62099] bootstrap build fails on ARM hard float system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62099 Peter A. Bigot pab at pabigot dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/61613] ,##__VA_ARGS__ fails to expand the first variadic argument if it is a macro-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61613 --- Comment #6 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com --- The patch should already pass the coding standards. I'm already legally registered as a contributor. Arthur, can you take care of the rest of the process? (Did you get my email?) I'd

[Bug preprocessor/61613] ,##__VA_ARGS__ fails to expand the first variadic argument if it is a macro-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61613 --- Comment #7 from Arthur O'Dwyer arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com --- @David, sadly, I'm not set up to build or test GCC patches, nor am I registered as a contributor. Anyone else want to step up? I could suggest test cases, perhaps, but I

[Bug c++/62101] New: deleted definitions of friend functions are rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62101 Bug ID: 62101 Summary: deleted definitions of friend functions are rejected Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug preprocessor/58844] [4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid use of ##

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58844 David Krauss potswa at mac dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||potswa at mac dot

[Bug target/26472] Default path for libgcc_s.sl is build directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26472 --- Comment #19 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 11-Aug-14, at 7:26 PM, wzis at hotmail dot com wrote: Not sure whether the issue I got is related to this bug: When using GCC to compile a C program, the binary got is linked with a

[Bug regression/62102] New: [4.10 Regression]: gcc.dg/torture/pr48953.c -O2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62102 Bug ID: 62102 Summary: [4.10 Regression]: gcc.dg/torture/pr48953.c -O2 -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/62103] New: Incorrect folding of bitfield in a union on big endian targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62103 Bug ID: 62103 Summary: Incorrect folding of bitfield in a union on big endian targets Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/62103] Incorrect folding of bitfield in a union on big endian targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62103 thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug middle-end/62103] Incorrect folding of bitfield in a union on big endian targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62103 --- Comment #2 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- I forgot to mention the flag to use: -O1 and whatever flag is necessary to select a big endian target (for instance -mbig-endian if the target is arm little endian by default).

[Bug middle-end/62103] Incorrect folding of bitfield in a union on big endian targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62103 --- Comment #3 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: thopre01 Date: Tue Aug 12 02:36:37 2014 New Revision: 213846 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213846root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-12 Thomas Preud'homme thomas.preudho...@arm.com

[Bug target/62025] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Miscompilation of openssl sha512.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62025 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot