[Bug lto/62179] New: undefined reference linking failure when combining extern template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62179 Bug ID: 62179 Summary: undefined reference linking failure when combining extern template Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/61800] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault during Firefox build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61800 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/62156] memcmp doesn't see through memcpy at compile-time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/62180] New: (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 Bug ID: 62180 Summary: (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access Product: gcc

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 --- Comment #2 from Jan Čapek jan.capek at braiins dot cz --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) C11 says something different here. Can you be a bit more specific?

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 --- Comment #3 from Jan Čapek jan.capek at braiins dot cz --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) C11 says something different here. I can see the following the -fstrict-volatile-bitfields documentation: This option should be used if

[Bug lto/62179] undefined reference linking failure when combining extern template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62179 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/62175] Internal compiler error in gimplify_modify_expr gimplify.c:4616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62175 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/62181] New: [C/C++] Expected new warning: adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string [-Wstring-plus-int]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181 Bug ID: 62181 Summary: [C/C++] Expected new warning: adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string [-Wstring-plus-int] Product: gcc Version: 5.0

[Bug lto/62179] undefined reference linking failure when combining extern template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62179 --- Comment #2 from miles at gnu dot org --- Sorry, that got submitted accidentally (it turns out that RET in the web page Summary text-box is bound to submit!) I'm not sure how to delete a bogus report... ^^; Could you delete that? [I

[Bug c/40989] -Werror= and #pragma diagnostics do not work with group flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40989 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/62182] New: New warning wished: operator== and equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison]/-Wunsed-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62182 Bug ID: 62182 Summary: New warning wished: operator== and equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison]/-Wunsed-value Product: gcc Version: 5.0

[Bug c/62183] New: [C/C++] Warning wished for !int_val == const / logical not is only applied to the left hand side of this comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62183 Bug ID: 62183 Summary: [C/C++] Warning wished for !int_val == const / logical not is only applied to the left hand side of this comparison Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c/62184] New: [C/C++] Extend -Wempty-body to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62184 Bug ID: 62184 Summary: [C/C++] Extend -Wempty-body to Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/62184] [C/C++] Extend -Wempty-body to 'while' loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62184 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c/62183] [C/C++] Warning wished for !int_val == const / logical not is only applied to the left hand side of this comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62183 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/62167] [tail-merge] dead type-unsafe load replaces type-safe load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62167 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33360 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33360action=edit tentative patch, testing atm

[Bug tree-optimization/62167] [tail-merge] dead type-unsafe load replaces type-safe load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62167 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/62178] [AArch64] Performance regression on matrix matrix multiply due to r211211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62178 bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker.cheng at

[Bug tree-optimization/62156] memcmp doesn't see through memcpy at compile-time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) Eventually worth fixing the libstdc++ side to generate better initial code? Replacing memcpy(,,3)+assign(,'\0') with memcpy(,,4) can

[Bug tree-optimization/62156] memcmp doesn't see through memcpy at compile-time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/61271] 10 * possible coding error with logical not (!)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Aug 19 11:35:39 2014 New Revision: 214142 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214142root=gccview=rev Log: PR c/61271 * cgraphunit.c

[Bug c/62141] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: Segmentation fault: 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62141 Yuri Gribov tetra2005 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at

[Bug c++/62185] New: New warning for defined as a struct here but previously declared as a class / [-Wmismatched-tags]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62185 Bug ID: 62185 Summary: New warning for defined as a struct here but previously declared as a class / [-Wmismatched-tags] Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/62185] New warning for defined as a struct here but previously declared as a class / [-Wmismatched-tags]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62185 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/62089] Sanitizer may fail to instrument struct accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62089 Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/61875] ATRIBUTE_NONNULL macro error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875 Yuri Gribov tetra2005 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at

[Bug debug/59051] DW_tag_restrict_type not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59051 --- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard mark at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mark Date: Tue Aug 19 11:50:55 2014 New Revision: 214143 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214143root=gccview=rev Log: Emit DW_tag_restrict_type for restrict-qualified

[Bug middle-end/62140] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: : in build2_stat, at tree.c:4265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140 Yuri Gribov tetra2005 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat

[Bug c++/62186] New: segfault on map.insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62186 Bug ID: 62186 Summary: segfault on map.insert Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug lto/62179] undefined reference linking failure when combining extern template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62179 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/62187] New: std::string==const char* could compare sizes first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62187 Bug ID: 62187 Summary: std::string==const char* could compare sizes first Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity:

[Bug libfortran/62188] New: Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 Bug ID: 62188 Summary: Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/62150] [5.0 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/fp16-mangle-1.C failed on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62150 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c/45584] typeof with casting from const to non-const does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45584 --- Comment #2 from ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ppalka Date: Tue Aug 19 14:14:15 2014 New Revision: 214151 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214151root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-08-19 Patrick Palka ppa...@gcc.gnu.org PR c/45584

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #7 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- I am not sure this is fixed. Attached code, when compiled by 20140817, with flags -std=gnu++11 -O2, does the following $ ../results/bin/gcc -c -std=gnu++11 -O2 bug161.cc

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 vp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vp at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/62186] segfault on map.insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62186 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/62168] error in configure: line 21572: test: =: unary operator expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62168 --- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Aug 19 16:23:36 2014 New Revision: 214168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214168root=gccview=rev Log: Set install_gold_as_default to no first

[Bug debug/61033] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Infinite loop in variable tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033 David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #8 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Created attachment 33362 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33362action=edit C++ source code

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dj at redhat dot com

[Bug debug/61033] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Infinite loop in variable tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033 --- Comment #9 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #8) Created attachment 33361 [details] C++ source code Please ignore this attachment. It is for a different bug.

[Bug libfortran/62188] Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/45584] typeof with casting from const to non-const does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45584 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9/5 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 19 17:29:41 2014 New Revision: 214177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214177root=gccview=rev Log: PR lto/53808 PR c++/61659 * decl.c

[Bug lto/53808] Undefined symbol when building a library with lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 19 17:29:41 2014 New Revision: 214177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214177root=gccview=rev Log: PR lto/53808 PR c++/61659 * decl.c

[Bug c++/62189] New: Different result between 4.6 and 4.9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62189 Bug ID: 62189 Summary: Different result between 4.6 and 4.9.1 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug lto/62190] New: LTO DWARF produces __unknown__ type for unsigned int function argument type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190 Bug ID: 62190 Summary: LTO DWARF produces __unknown__ type for unsigned int function argument type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/62191] New: extra shift generated for vector integer division by constant 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62191 Bug ID: 62191 Summary: extra shift generated for vector integer division by constant 2 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 19 18:25:45 2014 New Revision: 214181 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214181root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/62091 * decl2.c

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/62192] New: Segmentation fault when linking with Qt libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62192 Bug ID: 62192 Summary: Segmentation fault when linking with Qt libraries Product: gcc Version: 4.7.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Aug 19 18:50:00 2014 New Revision: 214183 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214183root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/62153 * doc/invoke.texi:

[Bug ada/62193] New: There is a bug in the Ada runtime which causes some Ada time functions to fail on the MinGW 32-bit platform .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62193 Bug ID: 62193 Summary: There is a bug in the Ada runtime which causes some Ada time functions to fail on the MinGW 32-bit platform . Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at

[Bug c++/62189] Different result between 4.6 and 4.9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62189 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/62194] New: Add deadfield attribute to ignore initializers for a structure field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62194 Bug ID: 62194 Summary: Add deadfield attribute to ignore initializers for a structure field Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 --- Comment #8 from Franz Sirl sirl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, what about the assignment part of the merged bug 44077: _Bool var = 3; Does the fix warn about this? Should I create a new bug report for this part?

[Bug fortran/61847] bug in gfortran runtime: digits cut off when reading floating point number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot

[Bug target/62195] New: [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62195 Bug ID: 62195 Summary: [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/62195] [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62195 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #33349|0 |1 is

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW ---

[Bug preprocessor/60975] -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: manu Date: Tue Aug 19 22:37:49 2014 New Revision: 214200 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214200root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-08-20 Manuel López-Ibáñez

[Bug c/53063] encode group options in the .opt files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: manu Date: Tue Aug 19 22:37:49 2014 New Revision: 214200 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214200root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-08-20 Manuel

[Bug preprocessor/60975] -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/51303] -Wmissing-include-dirs warnings reported as [enabled by default]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51303 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: manu Date: Tue Aug 19 22:52:02 2014 New Revision: 214201 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214201root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-08-20 Manuel López-Ibáñez

[Bug preprocessor/51303] -Wmissing-include-dirs warnings reported as [enabled by default]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51303 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/62196] New: running time segment fault with valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62196 Bug ID: 62196 Summary: running time segment fault with valarray Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/60417] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 01:16:31 2014 New Revision: 214205 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214205root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/60417 * init.c (build_vec_init): Set

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 01:17:37 2014 New Revision: 214206 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214206root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61566 * pt.c

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 01:54:40 2014 New Revision: 214208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214208root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61214 PR tree-optimization/62091

[Bug c++/61214] [4.9/5 regression] Weird interaction between -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, inline virtuals and devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61214 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 01:54:40 2014 New Revision: 214208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214208root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61214 PR tree-optimization/62091

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 02:03:56 2014 New Revision: 214209 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214209root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/62091 *

[Bug c++/61214] [4.9/5 regression] Weird interaction between -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, inline virtuals and devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61214 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/62111] ICE when building Linux kernel for sh64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62111 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8) I will try to test a patch, meanwhile, I am wondering if any combine expert has something to share. distribute_notes is certainly an endless

[Bug lto/62032] FAIL: vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62032 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/62197] New: Option -Bprefix does not affect the search for the assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62197 Bug ID: 62197 Summary: Option -Bprefix does not affect the search for the assembler Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/62150] [5.0 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/fp16-mangle-1.C failed on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62150 wangzheyu tony.wang at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tony.wang at arm dot

[Bug c++/62129] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constant, at varasm.c:4755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62129 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/62198] New: spurious warning - initialization discards qualifier from pointer target type for pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62198 Bug ID: 62198 Summary: spurious warning - initialization discards qualifier from pointer target type for pointer to array Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED