[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #29 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #28) (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #27) Possible fix: Applied to trunk, thanks. The fix isn't in trunk yet.

[Bug tree-optimization/63148] r187042 causes auto-vectorization failure for X86 for -m32.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63148 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/63148] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] r187042 causes auto-vectorization failure for X86 for -m32.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63148 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/63156] web can't handle AUTOINC correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63156 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW ---

[Bug tree-optimization/63148] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] r187042 causes auto-vectorization failure for X86 for -m32.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63148 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- The input to the vectorizer is already bogus: _12 = i.0_5 + 536870911; _13 = global_data.b[_12]; the issue seems to be that 'sizetype' is used to index the array: *(double

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) Seems to me we want (bit_xor (bswap32 @0) (bswap32 @1)) - (bswap32 (bit_xor @0 @1)) in match-and-simplify speak. Please note that

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/63157] may_alias doesn't work as expected in template nested types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63157 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/61943] tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:4148 signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61943 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug other/61905] zero variable length array bound in cp-demangle.c cplus_demangle_print_callback

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61905 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/61907] load of invalid value for 'bool' in trans-array.c trans_array_constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61907 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/61908] load of invalid value for 'expr_t' in interface.c compare_actual_formal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61908 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

[Bug fortran/61910] undefined computation in trans-expr.c gfc_conv_cst_int_power

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61910 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/61942] loop-iv.c:2272 signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61942 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can't reproduce this one.

[Bug rtl-optimization/61944] loop-iv.c:2610 signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61944 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/62058] Undefined behaviour in tree-data-ref.c with options -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62058 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug debug/61900] loc_descr_plus_const sanitizer runtime error in xgcc while building libgcc_s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61900 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug fortran/63153] pointers are not nullified with -finit-local-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63153 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) Aren't these optimizations actually a pessimization for -mmovbe if the inner bswap is on a read from memory? Assuming the load and bswap

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11) This one should be: (simplify (bswap (bitop (bswap @0) (bswap @1))) (bitop @0 @1)) Oh, we already have this. Please

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) (for bitop in bit_xor bit_ior bit_and (for bswap in BUILT_IN_BSWAP16 BUILT_IN_BSWAP32 BUILT_IN_BSWAP64 (simplify (bitop

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/63164] New: unnecessary calls to __dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63164 Bug ID: 63164 Summary: unnecessary calls to __dynamic_cast Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/61559] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c on i686 with -mmovbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #14) On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61559 --- Comment #12 from

[Bug sanitizer/61875] ATRIBUTE_NONNULL macro error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875 --- Comment #6 from Marat Zakirov m.zakirov at samsung dot com --- Created attachment 33446 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33446action=edit Proposed patch According to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00061.html

[Bug debug/60655] [4.9 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655 --- Comment #18 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amodra Date: Thu Sep 4 12:18:25 2014 New Revision: 214899 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214899root=gccview=rev Log: PR debug/60655 * dwarf2out.c

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #30 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 4 12:37:05 2014 New Revision: 214900 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214900root=gccview=rev Log: PR ipa/61659 * decl.c (duplicate_decls):

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jason at redhat dot com| ---

[Bug target/63165] New: [5 Regression] r214816 breaks Java build and 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63165 Bug ID: 63165 Summary: [5 Regression] r214816 breaks Java build and 435.gromacs Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/63165] [5 Regression] r214816 breaks Java build and 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63165 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug target/63165] [5 Regression] r214816 breaks Java build and 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63165 Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g

[Bug lto/63166] New: [5 Regression] ICE (LTO): ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization, at ipa-prop.c:2611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63166 Bug ID: 63166 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (LTO): ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization, at ipa-prop.c:2611 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status:

[Bug lto/63166] [5 Regression] ICE (LTO): ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization, at ipa-prop.c:2611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63166 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33448 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33448action=edit Test file two.ii

[Bug tree-optimization/63168] New: not vectorized: latch block not empty

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63168 Bug ID: 63168 Summary: not vectorized: latch block not empty Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/63168] loop header copying fails - not vectorized: latch block not empty

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63168 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/63166] [5 Regression] ICE (LTO): ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization, at ipa-prop.c:2611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63166 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug tree-optimization/63169] New: ivopts rewrite_uses pessimizes debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63169 Bug ID: 63169 Summary: ivopts rewrite_uses pessimizes debug info Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/63169] ivopts rewrite_uses pessimizes debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63169 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- IVOPTs depends on CSE to remove the effect of building its (sometimes gigantic) GENERIC expressions figuring out IVs and inserting them multiple times. Not sure if we even try to

[Bug go/63170] New: gccgo testcase recover.go fails execution with message 'missing recover' on ppc64 and ppc64le

--version gccgo (GCC) 5.0.0 20140904 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. This error occurs during make check testing

[Bug target/63171] New: Segfault in rs6000.c:rs6000_emit_move for multiple tls tests starting with r214658

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63171 Bug ID: 63171 Summary: Segfault in rs6000.c:rs6000_emit_move for multiple tls tests starting with r214658 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/61106] [4.8/4.9] impliedness of -Wunused-parameter depends on -W option ordering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regression] |[4.8/4.9]

[Bug target/63165] [5 Regression] r214816 breaks Java build and 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63165 --- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33449 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33449action=edit reduced testcase Reduced testcase from 435.gromacs build failure. [pthaugen@igoo

[Bug go/63172] New: gccgo testcase cplx2.go execution provides incorrect answers on trunk for powerpc64, powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63172 Bug ID: 63172 Summary: gccgo testcase cplx2.go execution provides incorrect answers on trunk for powerpc64, powerpc64le Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/63157] may_alias doesn't work as expected in template nested types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63157 --- Comment #2 from haynberg at sig dot com --- I recently read your old PR about placement new - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286. Is using placement new also a means to prevent strict-aliasing optimizations here? I don’t

[Bug go/63170] gccgo testcase recover.go fails execution with message 'missing recover' on ppc64 and ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63170 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Probably dup of PR60406.

[Bug rtl-optimization/63156] web can't handle AUTOINC correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63156 --- Comment #6 from Carrot carrot at google dot com --- (In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #5) (In reply to Carrot from comment #4) For a AUTOINC rtl expression, we create two refs, one def and one use, but only the def gets the flag

[Bug go/63170] gccgo testcase recover.go fails execution with message 'missing recover' on ppc64 and ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63170 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug go/60406] recover.go: test13reflect2 test failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||boger at us dot

[Bug target/63173] New: performance problem with simd intrinsics vld2_dup_* on aarch64-none-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63173 Bug ID: 63173 Summary: performance problem with simd intrinsics vld2_dup_* on aarch64-none-elf Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/62040] internal compiler error: in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1555

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62040 --- Comment #8 from carrot at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: carrot Date: Thu Sep 4 16:06:13 2014 New Revision: 214905 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214905root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/62040 * config/aarch64/iterators.md (VQ_NO2E,

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33450 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33450action=edit Experimental patch I'm currently bootstrapping this patch with various combinations.

[Bug target/63173] performance problem with simd intrinsics vld2_dup_* on aarch64-none-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63173 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/63174] New: ~!~F|BA: watch USA vs UKRAINE Live Streaming Online Fr33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63174 Bug ID: 63174 Summary: ~!~F|BA: watch USA vs UKRAINE Live Streaming Online Fr33 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug regression/63175] New: [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 basic block vectorized using SLP 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175 Bug ID: 63175 Summary: [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 basic block vectorized using SLP 1

[Bug libstdc++/63176] New: std::generate_canonicalfloat, std::numeric_limitsfloat::digits generates 1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63176 Bug ID: 63176 Summary: std::generate_canonicalfloat, std::numeric_limitsfloat::digits generates 1.0 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug regression/63177] New: Power/Linux no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 Bug ID: 63177 Summary: Power/Linux no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/62040] internal compiler error: in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1555

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62040 --- Comment #9 from carrot at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: carrot Date: Thu Sep 4 17:34:12 2014 New Revision: 214913 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214913root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/62040 * config/aarch64/iterators.md (VQ_NO2E,

[Bug c++/62306] [4.9/5 Regression?] Change in the comdat used for constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306 --- Comment #10 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8) I think I'm sympathetic to Rafael's argument that we should stick

[Bug c/63178] New: Missed incorrect-type-passed-to-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178 Bug ID: 63178 Summary: Missed incorrect-type-passed-to-function warning Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug regression/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-linux-gnu

[Bug c/63178] Missed incorrect-type-passed-to-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178 --- Comment #1 from Dima Kogan gccbugs at dima dot secretsauce.net --- Created attachment 33451 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33451action=edit The source to show the issue

[Bug c/63178] Missed incorrect-type-passed-to-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178 --- Comment #2 from Dima Kogan gccbugs at dima dot secretsauce.net --- Created attachment 33452 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33452action=edit and the header

[Bug c/63178] Missed incorrect-type-passed-to-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug regression/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug c++/63179] New: Does not work virtuality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63179 Bug ID: 63179 Summary: Does not work virtuality Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/63171] Segfault in rs6000.c:rs6000_emit_move for multiple tls tests starting with r214658

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63171 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/63178] Missed incorrect-type-passed-to-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178 --- Comment #4 from Dima Kogan gccbugs at dima dot secretsauce.net --- Hi. Thank you for looking at this. I'm not set up to make bleeding-edge gcc builds, so let me wait until Debian catches up, and I'll report back. Currently they're on r214759

[Bug tree-optimization/63180] New: Inconsistent replacement of printf by puts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63180 Bug ID: 63180 Summary: Inconsistent replacement of printf by puts Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/62208] [5 Regression] ICE with -fwhole-program on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62208 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/63180] Inconsistent replacement of printf by puts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63180 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/63179] Virtuality is not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63179 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I don't think this is valid, the standard says it is OK to access the stored value of the Child object through a union that has a Child member, or to access it through Base, but not

[Bug target/54412] Request for 32-byte stack alignment with -mavx on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412 --- Comment #6 from R Copley rcopley at gmail dot com --- As I mentioned in the description, this request was indeed related to that bug. The test-case no longer crashes with recent MinGW-W64 toolchains (GCC 4.9.1).

[Bug target/63165] [5 Regression] r214816 breaks Java build and 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63165 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: segher Date: Thu Sep 4 22:53:01 2014 New Revision: 214924 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214924root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-09-04 Segher Boessenkool

[Bug target/63165] [5 Regression] r214816 breaks Java build and 435.gromacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63165 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/63181] New: GCC should warn about obvious bugs in binding a reference to temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63181 Bug ID: 63181 Summary: GCC should warn about obvious bugs in binding a reference to temporary Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug target/46219] Generate indirect jump instruction on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46219 Adam Warner adam at consulting dot net.nz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug tree-optimization/63148] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] r187042 causes auto-vectorization failure for X86 for -m32.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63148 --- Comment #6 from Doug Gilmore doug.gilmore at imgtec dot com --- The input to the vectorizer is already bogus: _12 = i.0_5 + 536870911; _13 = global_data.b[_12]; Note that gimple out generated by the front end is already problematic:

[Bug target/54412] Request for 32-byte stack alignment with -mavx on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412 --- Comment #7 from Roland Schulz roland at rschulz dot eu --- For me the problem isn't fixed with gcc 4.9.1. I tried two build a)

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at

[Bug libgcc/63182] New: [5.0 Regression] libgcov-interface.c:136:33: error: alias definitions not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63182 Bug ID: 63182 Summary: [5.0 Regression] libgcov-interface.c:136:33: error: alias definitions not supported Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/55701] Inline some instances of memset for ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55701 --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Fri Sep 5 03:45:57 2014 New Revision: 214937 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214937root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/55701 * config/arm/arm.md (setmem): New