[Bug c++/63201] Full specialization of a member variable template of a class template does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63201 Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/61897] sanitizer internal compiler error: in build2_stat, at tree.c:4160

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61897 Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at

[Bug middle-end/62140] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: : in build2_stat, at tree.c:4265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140 --- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Sabrina, could you close if works for you?

[Bug bootstrap/63204] New: gtype-desc.c:887:40: error: 'struct loop' has no member named 'former_header' breaks bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63204 Bug ID: 63204 Summary: gtype-desc.c:887:40: error: 'struct loop' has no member named 'former_header' breaks bootstrap Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/63202] tree vectorizer does not make use of alignment information from VRP/CCP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63202 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- The

[Bug ipa/63196] [5.0 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr57140.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63196 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/63196] [5.0 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr57140.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63196 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ok, so the issue here is that we are copying a function during inline transform whose loops state needs fixups. That's undesirable.

[Bug bootstrap/63204] gtype-desc.c:887:40: error: 'struct loop' has no member named 'former_header' breaks bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63204 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/63202] tree vectorizer does not make use of alignment information from VRP/CCP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63202 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, as with restrict it would be nice to be able to annotate the memory references themselves with alignment info. Btw, a possibility would be to insert assume_aligned calls

[Bug middle-end/63200] [5.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/opt-11.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63200 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug target/63195] [5.0 regression] stage3 build/gengtype miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63195 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug libstdc++/63199] Inserting std::wregex to std::vector loses some std::wregex values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63199 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/63198] decltype in template function declaration yields spurious error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63198 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug rtl-optimization/63191] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] 32-bit gcc uses excessive memory during dead store elimination with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-*

[Bug rtl-optimization/63191] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] 32-bit gcc uses excessive memory during dead store elimination with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- With int a, b, c, d; struct X { int a; int b; void *p; } z[4]; void foo (void) { z[0].a = 1; z[0].b = 2; z[0].p = a; z[1].a = 1; z[1].b = 2; z[1].p = b; z[2].a = 1;

[Bug target/63190] Assembler errors when building md5 code from fbb on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63190 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/63189] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect results from trivial loop when optimized with O3 or O2+tree vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63189 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug bootstrap/63188] [5 Regression] r214954 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63188 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2

[Bug c++/63203] Self-initialization of reference not diagnosed if it occurs within a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63203 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/63205] New: [OOP] Wrongly rejects type = class (for identical declared type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205 Bug ID: 63205 Summary: [OOP] Wrongly rejects type = class (for identical declared type) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/63203] Self-initialization of reference not diagnosed if it occurs within a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63203 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried something like this: --- a/gcc/cp/decl.c +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c @@ -6101,6 +6101,12 @@ initialize_local_var (tree decl, tree init) -Wno-init-self works

[Bug tree-optimization/61743] [5 Regression] Complete unroll is not happened for loops with short upper bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743 --- Comment #10 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Richard, Do you have any progress? Thanks. 2014-08-13 12:35 GMT+04:00 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743

[Bug tree-optimization/62012] Loop is not vectorized after function inlining (SCEV)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62012 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Any updates? Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/61743] [5 Regression] Complete unroll is not happened for loops with short upper bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, ysrumyan at gmail dot com wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743 --- Comment #10 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/62012] Loop is not vectorized after function inlining (SCEV)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62012 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/62140] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: : in build2_stat, at tree.c:4265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140 --- Comment #6 from Sabrina Souto sabrinadfs at gmail dot com --- I checked with the current code in trunk and the test is passing, did you fixed it? What do you mean by close? Change the status for RESOLVED? (In reply to Yury Gribov from

[Bug middle-end/62140] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: : in build2_stat, at tree.c:4265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/63204] gtype-desc.c:887:40: error: 'struct loop' has no member named 'former_header' breaks bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63204 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 8 12:01:50 2014 New Revision: 215012 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215012root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-09-08 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug bootstrap/63204] gtype-desc.c:887:40: error: 'struct loop' has no member named 'former_header' breaks bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63204 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/47486] gfortran -M exits with fatal error when -o option is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47486 John Travers jtravs at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jtravs at gmail

[Bug middle-end/40135] using alias-set zero for union accesses necessary because of RTL alias oracle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40135 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- At least improved (but maybe not fixed) by 2010-02-16 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de * alias.c (memrefs_conflict_p): Distinguish must-alias from don't know.

[Bug middle-end/40135] using alias-set zero for union accesses necessary because of RTL alias oracle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40135 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ok it still has in the function comment ??? Contrary to the tree alias oracle this does not return one for X + non-constant and Y + non-constant when X and Y are equal.

[Bug middle-end/40135] using alias-set zero for union accesses necessary because of RTL alias oracle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40135 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Eventually just removing the call to mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p fixes the rest (rtx_refs_may_alias_p will apply TBAA as well, _after_ positively bailing out on the union

[Bug target/63206] New: Gcc 4.9.1 Generated code needlessly stacks r3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63206 Bug ID: 63206 Summary: Gcc 4.9.1 Generated code needlessly stacks r3 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug ipa/63196] [5.0 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr57140.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63196 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/63196] [5.0 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr57140.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63196 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 8 14:28:51 2014 New Revision: 215016 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215016root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-09-08 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug c++/63207] New: ICE in expand_expr_real_l when instantiating a template with a lambda that captures a const variable with a dependent initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63207 Bug ID: 63207 Summary: ICE in expand_expr_real_l when instantiating a template with a lambda that captures a const variable with a dependent initializer Product: gcc

[Bug c++/61825] [5 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- Honza, you meant to prepare a patch in July already https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg00985.html but nothing has happened since.

[Bug tree-optimization/63202] tree vectorizer does not make use of alignment information from VRP/CCP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63202 --- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org --- I'm not sure rewriting the pattern to assume_aligned would be useful. After all the user could already use assume_aligned directly. I was more thinking of cases when VRP/CCP can

[Bug target/63208] New: [SH] Add attribute naked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63208 Bug ID: 63208 Summary: [SH] Add attribute naked Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/63209] New: [ARM] Wrong conditional move generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63209 Bug ID: 63209 Summary: [ARM] Wrong conditional move generated Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug debug/61923] [4.8 Regression] -fcompare-debug errors while building Linux kernel.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61923 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 8 19:07:00 2014 New Revision: 215020 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215020root=gccview=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2014-08-06

[Bug debug/61923] [4.8 Regression] -fcompare-debug errors while building Linux kernel.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61923 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61838] ICE on Windows with ctors defined outside class definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61838 Stephan Tolksdorf st at quanttec dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||st at quanttec

[Bug tree-optimization/60196] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect compilation with -fwrapv and -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60196 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 8 20:07:29 2014 New Revision: 215024 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215024root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/60196 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/63189] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect results from trivial loop when optimized with O3 or O2+tree vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63189 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 8 20:07:29 2014 New Revision: 215024 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215024root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/60196 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/60196] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect compilation with -fwrapv and -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60196 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 8 20:15:31 2014 New Revision: 215025 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215025root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/60196 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/63189] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect results from trivial loop when optimized with O3 or O2+tree vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63189 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 8 20:15:31 2014 New Revision: 215025 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215025root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/60196 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/63189] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect results from trivial loop when optimized with O3 or O2+tree vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63189 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 8 20:18:02 2014 New Revision: 215026 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215026root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/60196 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/60196] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect compilation with -fwrapv and -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60196 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/60196] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect compilation with -fwrapv and -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60196 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 8 20:18:02 2014 New Revision: 215026 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215026root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/60196 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/63189] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect results from trivial loop when optimized with O3 or O2+tree vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63189 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/63178] Missed incorrect-type-passed-to-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178 --- Comment #5 from Dima Kogan gccbugs at dima dot secretsauce.net --- Hi. I cherry-picked the commit you mentioned, rebuilt gcc, and the bug was not resolved. Just in case I did something wrong in that process, I waited for Debian to update

[Bug rtl-optimization/62146] CSE replaces constant with an expression incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62146 Easwaran Raman eraman at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||larryv at

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #35 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org --- Created attachment 33461 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33461action=edit MacPorts log from a failed attempt to build libgcc @4.9.1_0 (x86_64) There’s a

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #36 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org --- (In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #34) I got the build to succeed by changing # if defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE) to # if !

[Bug c/38354] Spurious error: initializer element is not computable at load time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38354 --- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, adam at consulting dot net.nz wrote: 3. To demonstrate this, a GNU extension to C++ has no problem computing the address of the function

[Bug lto/63166] [5 Regression] ICE (LTO): ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization, at ipa-prop.c:2611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63166 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here I get: Determining dynamic type for call: OBJ_TYPE_REF(_76;(struct Foobar_Out)Foobar_LOG.D.2901-0) (Foobar_LOG.D.2901, , 1); Starting walk at: _69 = MEM[(struct Foobar_Out

[Bug lto/63166] [5 Regression] ICE (LTO): ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization, at ipa-prop.c:2611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63166 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Aha, is_global_var test going wrong way. I am testing: Index: ipa-prop.c === --- ipa-prop.c (revision 215023) +++

[Bug c++/61825] [5 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Hi, sorry for the delay, the problem is that I do not feel good about putting back the old code from fold-const, since it simply does not make sense. I need to dive into the C++ standard

[Bug c/38354] Spurious error: initializer element is not computable at load time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38354 --- Comment #8 from Adam Warner adam at consulting dot net.nz --- Joseph, you're correct: 4005fa: b8 c6 05 40 00 moveax,0x4005c6 4005ff: 89 05 cf 04 20 00 movDWORD PTR [rip+0x2004cf],eax # 600ad4

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #37 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org --- Okay, what I said initially was correct. This was the specific change I made. https://gist.github.com/larryv/9b1cd34a34733c10f734

[Bug rtl-optimization/63210] New: ira does not select the best register compared with gcc 4.8 for ARM THUMB1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63210 Bug ID: 63210 Summary: ira does not select the best register compared with gcc 4.8 for ARM THUMB1 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: